Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour

Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman


http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

---

› See More: Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour

thegoons <[email protected]> wrote:

> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman

> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf

Nope. Why should anyone be allowed to make anonymous
complaints about a posty drinking while delivering mail and
the posty not be allowed to know who made the complaint ?

Our legal system doesnt allow that with criminal matters, and neither should the APO.

The ombudsman is a ****wit.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> thegoons <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman
>
>> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf
>
> Nope. Why should anyone be allowed to make anonymous
> complaints about a posty drinking while delivering mail and
> the posty not be allowed to know who made the complaint ?
>
> Our legal system doesnt allow that with criminal matters, and neither
> should the APO.
>
> The ombudsman is a ****wit.
>
Nope, a Professor actually



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

thegoons wrote:
> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman
>
>
> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf

"In investigating these complaints, Australia Post officers contacted
the local police station to enquire about Mr H's character."

I guess Mr. H is currently living in a small rural town around the
year 1955?

thegoons wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote

>> The ombudsman is a ****wit.
>>
> Nope, a Professor actually
>
The two aren't mutually exclusive, not by a long shot

thegoons <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> thegoons <[email protected]> wrote

>>> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman

>>> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf

>> Nope. Why should anyone be allowed to make anonymous
>> complaints about a posty drinking while delivering mail and
>> the posty not be allowed to know who made the complaint ?

>> Our legal system doesnt allow that with criminal matters, and neither should the APO.

>> The ombudsman is a ****wit.

> Nope,

Yep.

> a Professor actually

He's both, ****wit.

> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman
>
>
> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf

Nothing has changed since.
I have a matter in the works now.
Hopefully soon I will feel more comfortable to be able to add more to this
thread.
I really think a good look at Australia Posts policies and procedures then
another look at the act and law is required.
Until then we all pay.

:-P

Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal
>> Ombudsman
>> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf
>
> Nothing has changed since.
> I have a matter in the works now.
> Hopefully soon I will feel more comfortable to be able to add more to
> this thread.
> I really think a good look at Australia Posts policies and procedures
> then another look at the act and law is required.
> Until then we all pay.

No we dont, I havent paid even a single cent.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal
>>> Ombudsman
>>> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf
>>
>> Nothing has changed since.
>> I have a matter in the works now.
>> Hopefully soon I will feel more comfortable to be able to add more to
>> this thread.
>> I really think a good look at Australia Posts policies and procedures
>> then another look at the act and law is required.
>> Until then we all pay.
>
> No we dont, I havent paid even a single cent.
>

So you are a tax avoider as well?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:13:12 +1100, thegoons wrote:

> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> thegoons <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman
>>
>>> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf
>>
>> Nope. Why should anyone be allowed to make anonymous
>> complaints about a posty drinking while delivering mail and
>> the posty not be allowed to know who made the complaint ?
>>
>> Our legal system doesnt allow that with criminal matters, and neither
>> should the APO.
>>
>> The ombudsman is a ****wit.
>>
> Nope, a Professor actually

Rod's right, and there are may ****wit professors out there. There's also
a legal doctrine known as "procedural fairness".

You only need to think about the reasoning used in this paragraph to
realize that he's a ****wit.

"One deficiency was that Mr H¢s identity had been disclosed to the PDO. In
the Ombudsman¢s view, Australia Post should have been aware of the
potential consequences of revealing Mr H¢s identity to the PDO. Had
Australia Post been aware, and acted accordingly, the subsequent
allegations made about threatening behaviour by the PDO might never have
arisen."

On Feb 26, 4:58*am, "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote:
> thegoons <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Nope. Why should anyone be allowed to make anonymous
> complaints about a posty drinking while delivering mail and
> the posty not be allowed to know who made the complaint ?
>
> Our legal system doesnt allow that with criminal matters, and neither should the APO.
>
> The ombudsman is a ****wit.

Rod--

you bake bread, dispense medicine and also deliver mail?

Lizzy

On Feb 25, 10:32*pm, "thegoons" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman
>
> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwe...tachmentsByTit...
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

One of my letters arrived still holding the "Thank You" card but not
the cheque for $700. The second hadn't reached its destination. This
one had a money order for $1000. The third arrived three weeks late,
money order enclosed.

These days, I enclose greeting cards in a business envlope. Haven't
lost any lately.

Lizzy

Can you please add me to your mailing list!

:-P

frilly.lizzy <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> thegoons <[email protected]> wrote

>> Nope. Why should anyone be allowed to make anonymous
>> complaints about a posty drinking while delivering mail and
>> the posty not be allowed to know who made the complaint ?

>> Our legal system doesnt allow that with
>> criminal matters, and neither should the APO.

>> The ombudsman is a ****wit.

> Rod--

> you bake bread,

Yes.

> dispense medicine

Never ever said anything like that.

> and also deliver mail?

Only when someone else's mail ends up in my letterbox when the posty ****s up.

thegoons <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
>> Peter <[email protected]> wrote

>>>> Australia Post - Shameful Behaviour - caught out by the Federal Ombudsman
>>>> http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/reports_2007_17/$FILE/reports_2007_17.pdf

>>> Nothing has changed since.
>>> I have a matter in the works now.
>>> Hopefully soon I will feel more comfortable to be able to add more
>>> to this thread.
>>> I really think a good look at Australia Posts policies and
>>> procedures then another look at the act and law is required.
>>> Until then we all pay.

>> No we dont, I havent paid even a single cent.

> So you are a tax avoider as well?

Nope.

The APO doesnt run at a loss, ****wit.