Results 31 to 37 of 37
- 05-08-2008, 04:05 PM #31Rod SpeedGuest
Re: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus
B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>> "B J Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> Horry wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do
>>>>>>> you suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>>>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>>
>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>
>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>
>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>> ****wit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, ****wit.
> What is FTTN, fwit?
Something you clearly dont have a ****ing clue about, ****wit.
> Exactly.
Nope.
› See More: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus
- 05-09-2008, 04:50 AM #32KwyjiboGuest
Re: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus
"B J Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Kwyjibo wrote:
>> "B J Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Kwyjibo wrote:
>>>> "B J Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> Horry wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:45:47 +1000, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> The government wants broadband in the bush.
>>>>>>>> That govt has gone, stupid.
>>>>>>> The *labor* government wants 98% coverage, speedy boy, how do you
>>>>>>> suppose they will achieve that by starting in the cities?
>>>>>> By moving into the bush once the cities are covered, perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>>
>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>>>
>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>
>> Who mentioned CBD's, ****wit?
>>
>
> Who asked you, moron?
You were replying to me when you stupidly tried to introduce "CBD" into the
discussion, ****wit.
Learn to follow a thread.
--
Kwyj.
- 05-10-2008, 03:41 PM #33B J FosterGuest
Re: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus
Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote:
....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>> ****wit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, ****wit.
>
>> What is FTTN, fwit?
>
> Something you clearly dont have a ****ing clue about, ****wit.
Sure, so educate me.
Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?
C'mon speedy, you should know - here's your chance to tell Australia.
>
>> Exactly.
>
> Nope.
>
>
- 05-10-2008, 04:53 PM #34Rod SpeedGuest
Re: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus
B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>>> ****wit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, ****wit.
>>> What is FTTN, fwit?
>> Something you clearly dont have a ****ing clue about, ****wit.
> Sure, so educate me.
Not even possible.
> Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?
None of the above.
> C'mon speedy, you should know
I do indeed.
> - here's your chance to tell Australia.
No need to, they arent as clueless as you always are.
>>> Exactly.
>> Nope.
- 05-11-2008, 05:46 AM #35B J FosterGuest
Re: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus
Rod Speed wrote:
> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
>
>>>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>
>>>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>
>>>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>
>>>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>
>>>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>
>>>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>>>> ****wit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, ****wit.
>
>>>> What is FTTN, fwit?
>
>>> Something you clearly dont have a ****ing clue about, ****wit.
>
>> Sure, so educate me.
>
> Not even possible.
>
>> Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?
>
> None of the above.
I thought so - pathetic
>
>> C'mon speedy, you should know
>
> I do indeed.
No evidence of that
>
>> - here's your chance to tell Australia.
>
> No need to, they arent as clueless as you always are.
>
>>>> Exactly.
>
>>> Nope.
>
>
- 05-11-2008, 07:27 AM #36Alan ParkingtonGuest
Re: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus
"B J Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
>>
>>>>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>
>>>>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>
>>>>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>
>>>>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>
>>>>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>
>>>>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>>>>> ****wit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, ****wit.
>>
>>>>> What is FTTN, fwit?
>>
>>>> Something you clearly dont have a ****ing clue about, ****wit.
>>
>>> Sure, so educate me.
>>
>> Not even possible.
>>
>>> Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?
>>
>> None of the above.
>
> I thought so - pathetic
>
>>
>>> C'mon speedy, you should know
>>
>> I do indeed.
>
> No evidence of that
>
>>
>>> - here's your chance to tell Australia.
>>
>> No need to, they arent as clueless as you always are.
>>
>>>>> Exactly.
>>
>>>> Nope.
>>
I think that Roddles needs to do us all a favour and self-immolate.
If you are not up to it Roddles, I'm sure I could drum up a few volunteers
to assist you.
- 05-11-2008, 01:23 PM #37Rod SpeedGuest
Re: Telstra chairman hits back at Optus
B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> B J Foster <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>>>>>> The cities already have broadband (mostly),
>>>>>>>> They don't have FTTN, which is what is being discussed.
>>>>>>>>> so starting there will just delay the whole process.
>>>>>>>> You really have no idea what you are waffling on about, do you?
>>>>>>> The CBDs already have FTTN, you idiot.
>>>>>> The CDBs are completely irrelevant to what is being discussed,
>>>>>> ****wit. And they dont have FTTN already anyway, ****wit.
>>>>> What is FTTN, fwit?
>>>> Something you clearly dont have a ****ing clue about, ****wit.
>>> Sure, so educate me.
>> Not even possible.
>>> Is it a product, a technology, a protocol? What is it?
>> None of the above.
> I thought so
Obvious lie. Ear to ear dog **** isnt even capable of thought.
> - pathetic
Your sig is supposed to be at the bottom with a --- on a line by itself in front of it, ****wit.
>>> C'mon speedy, you should know
>> I do indeed.
> No evidence of that
You wouldnt know what evidence was if it bit you on your lard arse, ****wit.
>>> - here's your chance to tell Australia.
>> No need to, they arent as clueless as you always are.
>>>>> Exactly.
>>>> Nope.
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.attws
- aus.comms.mobile
Immerse Yourself in Sensual Massage on rubpage
in Chit Chat