Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?


    "Snapper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Rod Speed wrote...
    >
    >> be shafted if they choose to ignore our law. Most obviously with the
    >> operations that are entirely overseas based and so arguably dont have
    >> any legal obligation to comply with our law and no way thats practical
    >> to take any action against them even if the authoritys decide to bother.

    >
    > What about the companies that they're selling products for here in
    > Australia?


    yes, they have to obide by DNC register

    > We get calls all the time regarding mobile phones. These originate from
    > OS,
    > usually India or whereever. But the products that they're selling have to
    > be
    > from here. So why not go those pricks? They are just using the call centre
    > as
    > their agents.


    So are you on DNC register?






    See More: More SPAM?




  2. #32
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?


    "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Snapper <[email protected]> wrote
    >> brian w edginton wrote

    >
    >>> A query for the techies.....is it possible that spam
    >>> can be directed to specific geographic areas?

    >
    >> You, like me, have had your number plucked
    >> out of possibly a random number thingy.

    >
    > It looks more likely he was targetted geographically.
    >
    > Its certainly technically feasible for the system to work out
    > which mobiles are working thru particular mobile bases.


    no its not





  3. #33
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?


    "John Henderson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Rod Speed wrote:
    >
    >> It looks more likely he was targetted geographically.
    >>
    >> Its certainly technically feasible for the system to work out
    >> which mobiles are working thru particular mobile bases.

    >
    > That suggests Optus is selling the info (about who is where)
    > based on its internal location registers. There are some
    > legitimate privacy issues in doing this.


    load of mass hysteria






  4. #34
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?

    >> > That suggests Optus is selling the info (about who is where)
    >> > based on its internal location registers.

    >>
    >> Not necessarily. They could be just delivering the spam SMS
    >> to the mobiles that their system knows are in a particular area.

    >
    > How would they know this?
    >
    > There used to be a geographical link to mobile numbers when they first
    > come out.
    > The phone's home cell had the area code in the number, but that quickly
    > fell by
    > the wayside as the takeup of mobiles got greater.


    On GSM, the geographic link was never smaller than state-based






  5. #35
    Michael
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?


    "John Henderson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Snapper wrote:
    >
    >> Rod Speed wrote...
    >>
    >>> > That suggests Optus is selling the info (about who is
    >>> > where) based on its internal location registers.
    >>>
    >>> Not necessarily. They could be just delivering the spam SMS
    >>> to the mobiles that their system knows are in a particular
    >>> area.

    >>
    >> How would they know this?

    >
    > google for "home location register" and "visitor location
    > register".


    WHICH SPAMMERS DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO, YOU FOOLS
    >
    > John






  6. #36
    brian w edginton
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?

    On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:21:41 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >"brian w edginton" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> ....have had a GSM service from Optus for years.
    >> I live in a rural area and had never had spam calls or messages.
    >> Recently, I was in town (Lismore NSW) on a rare visit.
    >> Had a voice call telling me I "might have won a $60 betting voucher".
    >> Terminated, immediately.
    >>
    >> A query for the techies.....is it possible that spam can be directed
    >> to specific geographic areas?

    >
    >no.
    >
    >a mobile number is a mobile number. its non geographic
    >s
    >



    So, I guess, it was a simple fluke that I got my only spam in several
    years while I was in a town area.

    Thanks.

    ----------------------------------------------


    Death is Nature's way of telling you you aren't
    needed, any more.



  7. #37
    Snapper
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?


    Michael wrote...

    > So are you on DNC register?


    I am now.




  8. #38
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?

    Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
    > "John Henderson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> Snapper wrote:
    >>
    >>> Rod Speed wrote...
    >>>
    >>>>> That suggests Optus is selling the info (about who is
    >>>>> where) based on its internal location registers.
    >>>>
    >>>> Not necessarily. They could be just delivering the spam SMS
    >>>> to the mobiles that their system knows are in a particular
    >>>> area.
    >>>
    >>> How would they know this?

    >>
    >> google for "home location register" and "visitor location
    >> register".

    >
    > WHICH SPAMMERS DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO, YOU FOOLS


    THEY DONT NEED TO, YOU STUPID PIG IGNORANT DRUG CRAZED DUNNY CLEANING ****WIT CHILD.





  9. #39
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?

    Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
    > "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> Snapper <[email protected]> wrote
    >>> brian w edginton wrote

    >>
    >>>> A query for the techies.....is it possible that spam
    >>>> can be directed to specific geographic areas?

    >>
    >>> You, like me, have had your number plucked
    >>> out of possibly a random number thingy.

    >>
    >> It looks more likely he was targetted geographically.
    >>
    >> Its certainly technically feasible for the system to work out
    >> which mobiles are working thru particular mobile bases.

    >
    > no its not


    Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
    never ever had a ****ing clue about anything at all, ever.





  10. #40
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: More SPAM?

    Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
    > "brian w edginton" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> ....have had a GSM service from Optus for years.
    >> I live in a rural area and had never had spam calls or messages.
    >> Recently, I was in town (Lismore NSW) on a rare visit.
    >> Had a voice call telling me I "might have won a $60 betting voucher".
    >> Terminated, immediately.
    >>
    >> A query for the techies.....is it possible that spam can be directed
    >> to specific geographic areas?


    > no.


    Yep.

    > a mobile number is a mobile number. its non geographic


    Irrelevant to whether it can be done anyway.





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123