Petition to enable [img] coding for siggys

I would like to canvas the mbrs here as to their interest in enabling [img] coding for signatures.

This will allow you to direct-link an image or images that portray your character.

I would be first in line to make it clear that the pics should be compressed and sized within accepted parameters.

No bigger than 600X200 pixels for example, and no bigger than 80kb? I think even that is generous.

Having signature pics greatly increases the sense of satisfaction in customizing ones appearance in cyberspace

---

› See More: Petition to enable [img] coding for siggys

Well... it looks like you've already got plenty of graphic elements bouncing around in your signature already! I doubt you'll find success with this one but,... it doesn't hurt to try does it?

I think thats a great idea!!!!!

...(the only person left on the planet with a slow dialup connection"??

but I'll survive

you have my sig,sorry it has to an online sig though.

I,theprodicalson do here by agree with the Petitioner, bubble.tea to enable the IMG tag in the sig line. below i place my SN john handcock [electronicly]


sign: Theprodicalson 9/5/05

always happy to help a decent cause. i hope you have a kicking IMG planned for your sig.

lol, love the formal petition up there. quite creative

I think its a great idea, most other forums online (Not cellphone ones) allow sigs with images. Its a great way to express who you are (as long as its acceptable) and to identify people.

wow...it's like a whole breed of opposite forum goers up in here.

Looks like this won't happen.

...the vote is 7 for, 2 against .... but John (tavenger5) is the only vote that matters

listen... if we do this... CPF will be sloooow... and we 56kers wont like that very much

I've given up hope...long time ago...right about post #2. lol

I'm unsubscribing even...cuz there's no point.

its ok, its just, hey, we 56kers sometime hate letting looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong pages load lol

Some people have so much junk in their sig now, that 56k users give up. I'd hate to see how slow it would get with picture sig's.

for instance, look at mine (its better than it WAS, lol )

Originally Posted by bossdragon

Some people have so much junk in their sig now, that 56k users give up. I'd hate to see how slow it would get with picture sig's.

I agree, and besides, last time i checked these forums are to discuss wireless technologies, not to come in here and read signatures...