reply to discussion |
Results 1 to 15 of 33
- 09-04-2005, 03:56 PM #1
I would like to canvas the mbrs here as to their interest in enabling [img] coding for signatures.
This will allow you to direct-link an image or images that portray your character.
I would be first in line to make it clear that the pics should be compressed and sized within accepted parameters.
No bigger than 600X200 pixels for example, and no bigger than 80kb? I think even that is generous.
Having signature pics greatly increases the sense of satisfaction in customizing ones appearance in cyberspace
› See More: Petition to enable [img] coding for siggys
- 09-04-2005, 04:05 PM #2
Well... it looks like you've already got plenty of graphic elements bouncing around in your signature already! I doubt you'll find success with this one but,... it doesn't hurt to try does it?
- 09-04-2005, 04:06 PM #3
- 09-05-2005, 06:11 AM #4
- Carrier
- Verizon Wireless
- Location
- only within the confines of imagination
- Posts
- 2,968 - liked 55 times
...(the only person left on the planet with a slow dialup connection"??
but I'll survive
- 09-05-2005, 09:47 PM #5
you have my sig,sorry it has to an online sig though.
I,theprodicalson do here by agree with the Petitioner, bubble.tea to enable the IMG tag in the sig line. below i place my SN john handcock [electronicly]
sign: Theprodicalson 9/5/05
always happy to help a decent cause. i hope you have a kicking IMG planned for your sig.
- 09-06-2005, 12:21 AM #6
- 09-06-2005, 02:17 PM #7
I think its a great idea, most other forums online (Not cellphone ones) allow sigs with images. Its a great way to express who you are (as long as its acceptable) and to identify people.
--ShutYoMouth--
- 09-07-2005, 02:01 PM #8
wow...it's like a whole breed of opposite forum goers up in here.
Looks like this won't happen.
- 09-07-2005, 02:46 PM #9
- Carrier
- Verizon Wireless
- Location
- only within the confines of imagination
- Posts
- 2,968 - liked 55 times
...the vote is 7 for, 2 against .... but John (tavenger5) is the only vote that matters
- 09-09-2005, 05:58 PM #10
listen... if we do this... CPF will be sloooow... and we 56kers wont like that very much
- 09-09-2005, 08:39 PM #11
I've given up hope...long time ago...right about post #2. lol
I'm unsubscribing even...cuz there's no point.
- 09-10-2005, 08:17 PM #12
its ok, its just, hey, we 56kers sometime hate letting looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong pages load lol
- 09-10-2005, 09:21 PM #13
- 09-11-2005, 12:37 AM #14
for instance, look at mine (its better than it WAS, lol )
- 09-11-2005, 01:21 AM #15Originally Posted by bossdragon
I agree, and besides, last time i checked these forums are to discuss wireless technologies, not to come in here and read signatures...
Similar Threads
- Kyocera
- alt.cellular.nokia
-
Is it true that Verizon will provide a firmware update for the V710 to enable all of the Bluetooth f
alt.cellular.motorola -
Is it true that Verizon will provide a firmware update for the V710 to enable all of the Bluetooth f
alt.cellular.motorola - alt.cellular.nokia
Newbie Member
in New Member Introductions