Test Mode Code List

"mingv" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <w9Hgf.1632$RI5.1019@trndny09>,
> "Remove This" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > And the reason someone would want to go into test mode is...........
>>
>> Given that I have GPS "always on" and I can reach the location page using
>> right arrow in debug, how
>> can I get the phone to act as a mini GPS, showing me my location??

I should have added "using A Samsung SCH-670 or 650

>

---

› See More: Test Mode Code List

On 21 Nov 2005 12:21:50 -0800, "David L" <[email protected]> wrote:

>LG VX10, 520, 2000, 3100, 3200, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700, 5550,
>6000, 6100, 7000, 8000
>Press Menu 0, Enter Service Code is 000000 (That is zero 6 times)
>Scroll to Field Test, Press Select
>Scroll to Service or Screen, Press Select
>Signal strength is a negative number in the center of the screen.
>To exit test mode: turn off phone.

Interestingly, on my 6100 all it takes is the 'clear' key to exit the
test screens. Maybe it's the particular software version I have...
T61VZV02, unless it's actually being left hanging in some strange mode
by doing this (though I haven't experienced any problems yet.)


--
To reply via email: this ID @<a well known service related to yodeling>.com

Yes it was cold, wellcold for here maybe 55 degrees. I know 104
sounds highand it only hit that enough to register in the Nokia
delayed readout,but many of the calls wer hovering around -100db. This
phone just hung through the dips,i doubt any discernable boice call was
transfered at this level. But I did record it all on my home
answering machine and there were numerous dropouts but no disconnects
for the whole drive down this country road. Seems like there is some
kind of timer that keeps the call loop open even through terrible
connections for a few seconds. That's all I can figure. There's no way
I can initiate a call at levelseven closr to 100. Around 92 or 94 db(
I'm guessing) is the least amount of signal a call can be originated.
But it holds even when there's some buzzinggoing on or there is dead
silence for a second or two.

I'm dying to have a little phone "shootout" with some v710 or E815
Motorolas, the other proclaimed reception kings. It would be great fun
to see who's phone could make receive and hold on to calls all from the
same location in a (my favorite?) fringe test spot. Everything else is
fairly cut and dried as far as ratings, but reception is so variable
(even with the same phone) and difficult to measure the very BEST
phone, when it comes down to those extreme fringe situations. I'm
convinced, only a direct comparison of at least a half dozen test calls
would be required to reveal the "Best" fringe reception phone. Certain
"other" phone users (none of the VZW users here might tend to
exaggerate and then believe their phone has the best reception after a
few other users of the same phone start believing there phone is the
best signalperformer because it has "4 bars signal strength". Imagine
the bragging rites to best reception phone!
Anyone live near Dublin/San Ramon California and think they have a VZW
top RF performer for a phone shootout some weekend or eve at,

N 37 48.933
W 122 02.831 (WGS 84)

"Oak" picnic area Dirt parking pullout, trail head for Chamise trail.
>From metal grate at pullout to roadway center line. Really good phones
can hold calls on top metal grate, signal improves towards center of
road.

or
N37 48.701
W 122 02.612
Only been able to make call out here maybe once or twice with a Bag
Phone and external antenna. Dirt Parking lot, between trash and edge of
road, outside first Park Gate.

If all else fails, RF wise a great place to hike and Geocache. Lots of
great views and geocaches throughout park. Contains an old Nuclear
Missle "Nike" Launch site. The peaks are great for testing Verizon
analog and SPCs roaming. A classic 4 bars and no signal zone on some
peaks, since the analog towers are too far away. SPCS boomers..that is
when PRLs still had, pre Aug 1s,t SPCS roaming. Still can SPCS roam
with older PRLs...DO NOT update PRL in Northern California or you lose
SPCS roaming!

Mountain Lions, bobcat, coyotes, foxes, skunks, rabid bats, wild
turkeys, hawks, buzzards, rattlesnakes. Zebras, ostriches, bulls and
goats, dear, wild bee hives, fleas and hungry ticks. Almost everything
in the park has come way to close, chased me (or given me the Icould be
dinner look), wound up on my hood after hitting it, stomped, snorted,
hissed, rattled or made their presence known in no uncertain terms. The
things I go through to test my phones for you guys

Dave

"David L" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1133639549.100810.214570
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

> Contains an old Nuclear
> Missle "Nike" Launch site.

I know someone who turned a missile silo into a home. It's very quite
behind so much concrete! None of that being woken up by the neighbor's
dog...(c;

It's so quiet they couldn't sleep the first few months.

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 19:19:26 -0500, Larry <[email protected]> chose to add
this to the great equation of life, the universe, and everything:

>"David L" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1133639549.100810.214570
>@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Contains an old Nuclear
>> Missle "Nike" Launch site.

Nike missiles were not nuclear, they were rather large anti-aircraft beasts
tasked to defending the cities against nuclear-laden Russian bombers. There
was a site less than a mile from where I live. The site was abandoned
several years before I was born, but the structures, both above and below
ground, remained until it was made into a park (called Nike Park) in the
'80s.

>I know someone who turned a missile silo into a home. It's very quite

Not a Nike, though.

>behind so much concrete! None of that being woken up by the neighbor's
>dog...(c;

Or their back porch light...

--
David Streeter, "an internet god" -- Dave Barry
http://home.att.net/~dwstreeter
Remove the naughty bit from my address to reply
Expect a train on ANY track at ANY time.
"Now go do... that voodoo... that you do... so well!" - Hedley Lamarr
"Woo, do that voodoo that you do so well." - Col. Sherman Potter

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:47:15 GMT, David S
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 19:19:26 -0500, Larry <[email protected]> chose to add
>this to the great equation of life, the universe, and everything:
>
>>"David L" <[email protected]> wrote in news:1133639549.100810.214570
>>@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> Contains an old Nuclear
>>> Missle "Nike" Launch site.
>
>Nike missiles were not nuclear, they were rather large anti-aircraft beasts
>tasked to defending the cities against nuclear-laden Russian bombers. There
>was a site less than a mile from where I live. The site was abandoned
>several years before I was born, but the structures, both above and below
>ground, remained until it was made into a park (called Nike Park) in the
>'80s.

Larry's not much for facts in the face of a good argument.

David S <[email protected]> wrote:
>Nike missiles were not nuclear, they were rather large anti-aircraft beasts
>tasked to defending the cities against nuclear-laden Russian bombers.

There were some nuclear Nike's too. The idea was that you would be willing to
do =anything= to prevent incoming bombs from reaching their target. Including
using your own nuke to blow up the incoming bomber or missile.

I had occasion once to have a long talk with a couple of the guys who ran the
Nikes up in Marin county. Since they had to take out incoming bad guys, the
nuclear Nikes that they ran were did not have all the fancy interlocks and
were freely retargetable. They mentioned that, in theory, they could have
taken out San Francisco in a few seconds, anytime. The Army tried to be
=really= careful about who chose for their missile crews.

See "Nike Hercules" at http://www.nikemissile.org. (I note that that
organization is based a few blocks from my house here. Probably the same
fellows!)

Garry

The Ghost of General Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Contains an old Nuclear
>>>> Missle "Nike" Launch site.
>
>Larry's not much for facts in the face of a good argument.

Ah... Larry's comment was completely accurate. Look at it again.

Garry

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:05:14 -0800, Garry W
<[email protected]> wrote:

>The Ghost of General Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Contains an old Nuclear
>>>>> Missle "Nike" Launch site.
>>
>>Larry's not much for facts in the face of a good argument.
>
>Ah... Larry's comment was completely accurate. Look at it again.
>

I saw nothing in that link or in my searches to indicate that Nikes
were stored in "silos". Rather, they were stored horizontally in
underground magazine racks. I think Larry's confusing it with an ICBM
silo.

Garry W <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> See "Nike Hercules"

In 1953, when I was 7 years old, my uncle was in the Army and stationed
at White Sands Proving Grounds in New Mexico. It was the first trip of
my life more than 50 miles from home in upstate NY.

White Sands was testing the new Nike missiles and during the time we were
living in this tiny 8x35' trailer cooled with a swamp cooler in the
desert, they shot off two of them. At the time, my uncle convinced me
they heard I was coming and shot them off just for me...(c;

It was an amazing sight for a 7 year old kid....

Both missiles seemed to fly just like they were supposed to, way out of
sight.

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:22:39 -0500, The Ghost of General Lee
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:05:14 -0800, Garry W
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>The Ghost of General Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Contains an old Nuclear
>>>>>> Missle "Nike" Launch site.
>>>
>>>Larry's not much for facts in the face of a good argument.
>>
>>Ah... Larry's comment was completely accurate. Look at it again.
>>
>
>I saw nothing in that link or in my searches to indicate that Nikes
>were stored in "silos". Rather, they were stored horizontally in
>underground magazine racks. I think Larry's confusing it with an ICBM
>silo.

You didn't look to hard, did you?

http://www.correctionhistory.org/htm...ing/index5.htm

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:12:58 -0500, rring <[email protected]> wrote:

>>I saw nothing in that link or in my searches to indicate that Nikes
>>were stored in "silos". Rather, they were stored horizontally in
>>underground magazine racks. I think Larry's confusing it with an ICBM
>>silo.
>
>You didn't look to hard, did you?
>
>http://www.correctionhistory.org/htm...ing/index5.htm
>

Those look exactly like the magazine rack covers on the other pages.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't all Nikes require an erector for
launch?

[original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:57:11 -0800, Garry W
<[email protected]> wrote:

>David S <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Nike missiles were not nuclear, they were rather large anti-aircraft beasts
>>tasked to defending the cities against nuclear-laden Russian bombers.
>
>There were some nuclear Nike's too. The idea was that you would be willing to
>do =anything= to prevent incoming bombs from reaching their target. Including
>using your own nuke to blow up the incoming bomber or missile.
>


If you want defensive nuclear missiles think Sprint and Spartan.

http://w3.uwyo.edu/~jimkirk/abm.html

I had the opportunity to work at that site.

gerry

--

Personal home page - http://gogood.com

gerry mis*****ed in my email address to confuse robots

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:13:41 -0500, The Ghost of General Lee
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:12:58 -0500, rring <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>I saw nothing in that link or in my searches to indicate that Nikes
>>>were stored in "silos". Rather, they were stored horizontally in
>>>underground magazine racks. I think Larry's confusing it with an ICBM
>>>silo.
>>
>>You didn't look to hard, did you?
>>
>>http://www.correctionhistory.org/htm...ing/index5.htm
>>
>
>Those look exactly like the magazine rack covers on the other pages.
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't all Nikes require an erector for
>launch?


If its a matter of semantics that's one thing but he called them "silo's"
and these are called "silo's" and I can get you a plethora of web pages
that call them "silo's" also.

People might like Larry much but whether it is him or someone else's post
that you are going to argue with make sure you don't put your foot in your
mouth while doing it.

On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:37:37 -0500, rring <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:13:41 -0500, The Ghost of General Lee
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:12:58 -0500, rring <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>I saw nothing in that link or in my searches to indicate that Nikes
>>>>were stored in "silos". Rather, they were stored horizontally in
>>>>underground magazine racks. I think Larry's confusing it with an ICBM
>>>>silo.
>>>
>>>You didn't look to hard, did you?
>>>
>>>http://www.correctionhistory.org/htm...ing/index5.htm
>>>
>>
>>Those look exactly like the magazine rack covers on the other pages.
>>Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't all Nikes require an erector for
>>launch?
>
>
>If its a matter of semantics that's one thing but he called them "silo's"
>and these are called "silo's" and I can get you a plethora of web pages
>that call them "silo's" also.

Oh really? With Larry, it's always a matter of semantics *and* of
fact. BTW, from that site you referenced:

"This technique contrasts with the popular notion of a missile "silo"
in which missiles are stored inside of a deep vertical well in a
ready-to-fire condition."

So it appears they don't even consider them silos. I've seen a bunch
of websites by people claiming to be abducted by UFOs, but that don't
make it so, does it?

>People might like Larry much but whether it is him or someone else's post
>that you are going to argue with make sure you don't put your foot in your
>mouth while doing it.
>

Talk to Larry, the master of foot in mouth disease. Or did you catch
his latest claim that a 737 crashed into a 16' hole in the Pentagon on
9/11/2001?