1. #1
    sakuragi
    sakuragi is offline
    Junior Member

    Posts
    11
    I was just wondering if this was a good phone. Would anyone recommend this phone?


    See More: Nokia 6100




  2. #2
    gpalouk
    gpalouk is offline
    Junior Member

    Location
    Patras, Greece
    Posts
    29

    Was a good phone...

    You have right, it WAS a good phone in 2003. Now, I think is an old model. Better, Look for Nokia 3200. Many more features, cheaper phone.

    If you care about phone's volume and design I think 6100 is better. 3200 is little more bulky.

    gpalouk.



  3. #3
    hallo
    hallo is offline
    Newbie

    Posts
    4

    yes! i use the nokia 6100... then again i bought it in the summer of 2003. I have run into very few problems with it. compared to contemporary phones however it is kinda lacking in extra functions, but if you're not looking for a gadget to wow your neighbor and his whole extended family, then the 6100 should be fine.



  4. #4
    @ndres
    @ndres is offline
    Phone Expert
    @ndres's Avatar

    Location
    Sitting infront of my exploding TV...
    Posts
    1,009 - liked 7 times

    Yeah,... as gpalouk had said,... it's an old model and there's much other better ones,... the memory isn't much too,... and it does not have a radio,... get it only if u really like it's design,... other than that,... there isn't much to it,....



  5. #5
    ski_power
    ski_power is offline
    Phone Expert
    ski_power's Avatar

    Posts
    1,131 - liked 4 times

    Get the 6610. It's better for the same cost. Alternatively you could get the SE T310 which except the miniscule screen(101x80, 256 colours) is a packed phone.
    What you lookin' here for ehhh?



  6. #6
    djuhn
    djuhn is offline
    Junior Member

    Posts
    26

    i just really liked the size of it, esp. compared to 6610/7210. on paper, it seems like nothing, but when you actually hold it.. yehh



  7. #7
    ski_power
    ski_power is offline
    Phone Expert
    ski_power's Avatar

    Posts
    1,131 - liked 4 times

    hey djuhn, if you are talking weight you should see the samsung C100. Same features, lighter, and some features are better.

    Personally, 6100 doesn't appeal to people here.
    What you lookin' here for ehhh?



  8. #8
    phredo
    phredo is offline
    Junior Member

    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6

    7210

    the 7210 has exactly the same features but with a way cooler look .. it's a matter of personality i think



  9. #9
    ski_power
    ski_power is offline
    Phone Expert
    ski_power's Avatar

    Posts
    1,131 - liked 4 times

    It's like Nokia are expanding their market. Using a standard platform they are making different designs.
    Can anyone confirm if the 7210 Xpress-On will fit the 6610?
    What you lookin' here for ehhh?



  10. #10
    UberMan
    UberMan is offline
    Member

    Posts
    62

    I got a 6100!!!
    I can tell u this, it's da lightest in its class & da smallest!!!!

    It's even lighter than da Siemens SL55

    It's a nice phone w/ numerous lil features

    A nice alternative is da 6220, but is much more expensive but offers much more features including more than 4 times da memory of da 6100!!!!



  11. #11
    ski_power
    ski_power is offline
    Phone Expert
    ski_power's Avatar

    Posts
    1,131 - liked 4 times

    No one would recommend the old 6100 TODAY.
    Please don't buy it, it has no great features.
    What you lookin' here for ehhh?



  12. #12
    @ndres
    @ndres is offline
    Phone Expert
    @ndres's Avatar

    Location
    Sitting infront of my exploding TV...
    Posts
    1,009 - liked 7 times

    Originally posted by UberMan
    A nice alternative is da 6220, but is much more expensive but offers much more features including more than 4 times da memory of da 6100!!!!
    Of course it's more expensive and has more memory,... if it didn't have much memory,... the cam and function to take videos would be quite useless,... the 6100 here is still quite expensive though,... don't know why...



  13. #13
    mohen
    mohen is offline
    Member

    Posts
    92

    if u really into the 6100 , u should goto 6610 !
    i got them both ! and 6610 is wayyyyyy better ...
    it's got radio FM stereo ... and i think it's got more memory inside .. and it's almost the same size like the 6100 !
    go for 6610



  14. #14
    @ndres
    @ndres is offline
    Phone Expert
    @ndres's Avatar

    Location
    Sitting infront of my exploding TV...
    Posts
    1,009 - liked 7 times

    Originally posted by mohen
    if u really into the 6100 , u should goto 6610 !
    i got them both ! and 6610 is wayyyyyy better ...
    it's got radio FM stereo ... and i think it's got more memory inside .. and it's almost the same size like the 6100 !
    go for 6610
    I think 6100's a little slimmer,... but like u said,... 6610's much better...!!! and it's cheaper here as well...!!!



  15. #15
    ski_power
    ski_power is offline
    Phone Expert
    ski_power's Avatar

    Posts
    1,131 - liked 4 times

    Nah, the 6610 and 6100, as a matter of fact even 3100, 7210, have 725kB useable memory, of the total 1024kB(the other is for the OS)
    What you lookin' here for ehhh?



  • Phones Discussed Above

    Nokia 6100 More Nokia 6100 topics Nokia Forum Reviews
  • Similar Threads







  • Quick Reply Quick Reply

    If you are already a member, please login above.