why not?

Why can't I have 2 cell phones simultaneously with the same phone #? Why
won't they cell me 2 sum cards? I want to have one for upstairs & 1 for
downstairs . . .

---

› See More: why not?

Originally Posted by Lisa Simpson

Why can't I have 2 cell phones simultaneously with the same phone #? Why
won't they cell me 2 sum cards? I want to have one for upstairs & 1 for
downstairs . . .

It's not possible. Two sim cards would do you no good. Only one sim card can be active on an account at a time. So even if you had 2 sim cards only one would be active, the other one would say unregistered sim.

My biggest question would be: Do you really need one for upstairs and one for downstairs?

scott14661 wrote:
> Lisa Simpson Wrote:
>
>>Why can't I have 2 cell phones simultaneously with the same phone #?
>>Why
>>won't they cell me 2 sum cards? I want to have one for upstairs & 1
>>for
>>downstairs . . .
>
>
> It's not possible. Two sim cards would do you no good. Only one sim
> card can be active on an account at a time. So even if you had 2 sim
> cards only one would be active, the other one would say unregistered
> sim.
>
> My biggest question would be: Do you really need one for upstairs and
> one for downstairs?
>
>
yeah, i think what you want is a landline. or just carry your phone with
you. that's why it's called a mobile phone.

The biggest reason you can't have two phones with the same number is, you
are a very BAD *****er!

"Lisa Simpson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why can't I have 2 cell phones simultaneously with the same phone #? Why
> won't they cell me 2 sum cards? I want to have one for upstairs & 1 for
> downstairs . . .
>
>

Check out
http://www.phonelabs.com/ - dock-n-talk.

Use one phone and connect to your inside wiring.


"Lisa Simpson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why can't I have 2 cell phones simultaneously with the same phone #? Why
> won't they cell me 2 sum cards? I want to have one for upstairs & 1 for
> downstairs . . .
>
>