Cingular Phones

Of the currently available Cingular phones, which ones are the best? I
have had good experiences with Nokia's in the past...How's the Razr?

Ersalan Rahman

Its slim thats all i can say.

yeah i've heard mixed things about the razr...some people love it,
others have had some problems with it such as dropped calls.
Ace587 wrote:
> Its slim thats all i can say.
>
>
> --
> Ace587
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ace587's Profile: http://cellphoneforums.net/member.ph...o&userid=77693
> View this thread: http://cellphoneforums.net/t226657

it really depends on the person, if you prefer form over function, then you will like the razr, unlike me who prefers function over form, i simply dont like the razr, i would rather get an ugly but powerful phone

"Ace587" <Ace587.2c7c45@nospam.cellphoneforums.net> wrote in message
news:Ace587.2c7c45@nospam.cellphoneforums.net...
>
> it really depends on the person, if you prefer form over function, then
> you will like the razr, unlike me who prefers function over form, i
> simply dont like the razr, i would rather get an ugly but powerful
> phone

From my use of the RAZR, I can't imagine a more functional phone.

As a cellular application developer, I probably use more features than
average, save the entertainment functions of a phone like music player. It's
program limitations are met with the Q, at what I consider to be a small
difference in price.

I consider 'ubiquitous' to be an important factor.

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:23:13 -0500, "Thurman" <thurman@bigplanet.com>
wrote in <Iu_Bg.37$QD6.19@fe04.lga>:

>"Ace587" <Ace587.2c7c45@nospam.cellphoneforums.net> wrote in message
>news:Ace587.2c7c45@nospam.cellphoneforums.net.. .
>>
>> it really depends on the person, if you prefer form over function, then
>> you will like the razr, unlike me who prefers function over form, i
>> simply dont like the razr, i would rather get an ugly but powerful
>> phone
>
>From my use of the RAZR, I can't imagine a more functional phone.

Lacks EGPRS(EDGE), and uncomfortable to hold (for me at least).

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:amchd2pivk731l9f69vu084ef0em2oj2c6@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:23:13 -0500, "Thurman" <thurman@bigplanet.com>
> wrote in <Iu_Bg.37$QD6.19@fe04.lga>:
>
>>"Ace587" <Ace587.2c7c45@nospam.cellphoneforums.net> wrote in message
>>news:Ace587.2c7c45@nospam.cellphoneforums.net. ..
>>>
>>> it really depends on the person, if you prefer form over function, then
>>> you will like the razr, unlike me who prefers function over form, i
>>> simply dont like the razr, i would rather get an ugly but powerful
>>> phone
>>
>>From my use of the RAZR, I can't imagine a more functional phone.
>
> Lacks EGPRS(EDGE), and uncomfortable to hold (for me at least).
>
I moved up from a V400 to the Razr, found it
had better reception and better speaker (sound)
quality. As a phone, it seems to be a pretty good one.

It seems to do what I need it to, and with Opera Mini,
it does the small amount of surfing I need to do well enough.


Bernard

get a nokia, since you had good experiences in the past, why not experience it again