Website to compare deals

Anyone know of a good website to compare deals, now that Reesit Mutton site
is no more.

---

› See More: Website to compare deals

"James" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Anyone know of a good website to compare deals, now that Reesit Mutton
site
> is no more.
>
There is http://www.mobilechecker.com/ . However it often does not include
online deals from network providers such as Orange that are sometimes better
than those from listed providers and with those you do not need to worry
about cashbacks.
roman

James wrote:
> Anyone know of a good website to compare deals, now that Reesit Mutton site
> is no more.
>
>
>
he has returned, although not yet officially, from
alt.consumers.uk-discounts.and.bargains:

http://www.reestitmutton.co.uk/index.php

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Pritchard
Web :: http://www.blueghost.co.uk
Reply-To :: replace '@austin.3.16' with '@blueyonder.co.uk'
Ad :: Want your Nokia phone fully unlocked and reset, see
:: http://www.blueghost.co.uk/unlock_guide/
--------------------------------------------------------------------

> There is http://www.mobilechecker.com/ . However it often does not include
> online deals from network providers such as Orange that are sometimes better
> than those from listed providers and with those you do not need to worry
> about cashbacks.

Hi all

Just to say that the site does compare deals from online network
provider's sites but only shows their deals IF they are the most
competive at that price / tariff point. I am looking into showing more
deals per tariff / cost but there are over 20,000 deals to compare so
it is a balancing act of having 30 or more versions of the same deal
displayed or only showing the best deals per tariff.

The issue of worrying about cashback is one that I believe is up to the
consumer's personal preference.


Andy

-------------------------------------
www.mobilechecker.com
....compares every mobile deal to find you the best price!

"Andy_Checker" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > There is http://www.mobilechecker.com/ . However it often does not
include
> > online deals from network providers such as Orange that are sometimes
better
> > than those from listed providers and with those you do not need to worry
> > about cashbacks.
>
> Hi all
>
> Just to say that the site does compare deals from online network
> provider's sites but only shows their deals IF they are the most
> competive at that price / tariff point.

SE W800i, Orange online Your Plan 120, £225 total contract price, which is
NOT in your table, is certainly a better deal than, for example, OVP Relax
100 at £271.49 and OVP Voda 100 at £285.99 which are featured.
Roman

> SE W800i, Orange online Your Plan 120, £225 total contract price, whichis
> NOT in your table, is certainly a better deal than, for example, OVP Relax
> 100 at £271.49 and OVP Voda 100 at £285.99 which are featured.

If you look at the deals for the above e.g. the w800i for £225 total
year cost you are referencing:

You can actually get 2 better deals for this price on the Your Plan 200
and OVP Voda 200 tariff's which both come with 200 minutes compared to
the Your Plan 120 default 120 minutes available with Orange online that
you have mentioned.

I will again state that the deals are sorted on total cost and hence
show the best deals available for the lowest minimum term cost and I am
investigating ways of showing more deals per tariff than curently shown
(even though I compare the online retailers deals in my database in the
backgorund).

Also I would like to say 99.9% of my site's user's want the current
functionality i.e. cheapest deals outright per tariff rather than
having to go through a list of 30 or more comparison's of the SAME
tariff across all the retailer's each time i.e. they want the deals
compared and the chepeast displayed which is what I offer.

Andy

"Andy_Checker" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> SE W800i, Orange online Your Plan 120, £225 total contract price, which is
> NOT in your table, is certainly a better deal than, for example, OVP
Relax
> 100 at £271.49 and OVP Voda 100 at £285.99 which are featured.

If you look at the deals for the above e.g. the w800i for £225 total
year cost you are referencing:

I would suggest then that your sorting method is at fault because it does
not sort on the "best" deal. 120 minutes at £225 is certainly better than
100 minutes at £271.49 or even at £285.99 on the same network.
Roman

> I would suggest then that your sorting method is at fault because it does
> not sort on the "best" deal. 120 minutes at £225 is certainly better than
> 100 minutes at £271.49 or even at £285.99 on the same network.

My sorting method is not at fault but simply not working in the way you
expect despite me explaining on the actual web site, this newsgroup and
in replies to emails you have sent me from my site the way the site is
set up and works:

So for the last time: 99.9 % of people think that 2 different tariff's
which give you 200 minutes free compared to a tariff that only gives
you 120 minutes free for £225 minimum term cost are the "best" deal.

The site is ever expanding and will incorporate new ideas and
functionality / sorting methods but this all takes time to implement.

Andy

"Andy_Checker" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I would suggest then that your sorting method is at fault because it does
> not sort on the "best" deal. 120 minutes at £225 is certainly better than
> 100 minutes at £271.49 or even at £285.99 on the same network.


> 99.9 % of people think that 2 different tariff's
>which give you 200 minutes free compared to a tariff that only gives
>you 120 minutes free for £225 minimum term cost are the "best" deal.

Yes, but 99.9% of people will also agree that the tariff you excluded which
gives you 120 minutes at £225 is a *superior deal* compared to tariffs
which you included in the table where you only get 100 minutes and pay
either £271.49 or £285.99 ! My assertion that your sorting method does
not sort on the "best deal" is therefore correct.
Roman

"r_mervart" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Andy_Checker" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> I would suggest then that your sorting method is at fault because it does
>> not sort on the "best" deal. 120 minutes at £225 is certainly better
>> than
>> 100 minutes at £271.49 or even at £285.99 on the same network.
>
>
>> 99.9 % of people think that 2 different tariff's
>>which give you 200 minutes free compared to a tariff that only gives
>>you 120 minutes free for £225 minimum term cost are the "best" deal.
>
> Yes, but 99.9% of people will also agree that the tariff you excluded
> which
> gives you 120 minutes at £225 is a *superior deal* compared to tariffs
> which you included in the table where you only get 100 minutes and pay
> either £271.49 or £285.99 ! My assertion that your sorting method does
> not sort on the "best deal" is therefore correct.
> Roman
>
>Since yesterday he's back

www.reestitmutton.co.uk

HTH

"fred" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "r_mervart" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Andy_Checker" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> I would suggest then that your sorting method is at fault because it
does
> >> not sort on the "best" deal. 120 minutes at £225 is certainly better
> >> than
> >> 100 minutes at £271.49 or even at £285.99 on the same network.
> >
> >
> >> 99.9 % of people think that 2 different tariff's
> >>which give you 200 minutes free compared to a tariff that only gives
> >>you 120 minutes free for £225 minimum term cost are the "best" deal.
> >
> > Yes, but 99.9% of people will also agree that the tariff you excluded
> > which
> > gives you 120 minutes at £225 is a *superior deal* compared to tariffs
> > which you included in the table where you only get 100 minutes and pay
> > either £271.49 or £285.99 ! My assertion that your sorting method
does
> > not sort on the "best deal" is therefore correct.
> > Roman
> >
> >Since yesterday he's back
>
> www.reestitmutton.co.uk
>
.......though not yet officially -
Roman

James wrote:
> Anyone know of a good website to compare deals, now that Reesit Mutton site
> is no more.

Reestit Mutton is back!

http://www.reestit-mutton.co.uk/

It's just the good deals that have gone away!

regards, Ian