On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:26:51 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
>
><benedict@despammed.com> wrote in message
>news:7e52t159ie2vga8cvldhfes85q4n1df8rk@4ax.com
>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:49:52 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
>> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > "Pricefighter" <pricefighter@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1137718072.585624.34460@o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com
>> > > You get up to 300 free texts the first month
>> > > irrespective of your spend. Its only the second month
>> > > you have to top up to get free texts.
>> >
>> > That's splitting hairs. As a general rule, you still
>> > have to top up to get them. Therefore they are not free.
>>
>> I am afraid that the OP is correct in what he/she/it
>> posted and "general rules" don't really enter it.
>>
>> The SIMs are free and you get 300 texts for free.
>>
>> Where does it say that you must use the SIM again after
>> the first month is over?
>
>Again, splitting hairs. The impression given is that you get free texts on
>an ongoing basis. You don't.
That was the impression that you may have received. I followed the
links, read the information and received a different impression.
Incidentally, the impression I received from your message that these
were NOT free texts was that there were no free texts at all.
So, at the risk of a further accusation of "hair-splitting", I'd
suggest that your own follow-up lacked precision.... perhaps that is
why you are being so combative now but I think the honest thing to do
would be to admit to your mistake.
--
Benedict