YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN

[email protected] wrote:<?>

Does he drive two Jags?

---

› See More: YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >Where does this entitlement come from then? Seems to me that if some ****
> >wants to post pages of bollocks right across Usenet then they full deserved
> >to be called a dog-felching wank stain.
> >
> >Yes, he's entitled to his opinion, but everybody else is equally entitled to
> >the opinion that the OP should stick it up his arse.
> >
> >Anyway, insulting the opinions of others is what made Usenet great.
>
> Do you really have to be so offensive?
>
Look, everyone, it's Ned Flanders...

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:

>>Yes, he's entitled to his opinion, but everybody else is equally entitled
>>to
>>the opinion that the OP should stick it up his arse.
>>
>>Anyway, insulting the opinions of others is what made Usenet great.
>
> Do you really have to be so offensive?

What's it to you, ****-face?

"AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]
> "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > He's entitled to his opinion. I grant you this isn't
> > really the place for it, but he's still entitled to it
> > without insults from you.
>
> Where does this entitlement come from then? Seems to me
> that if some **** wants to post pages of bollocks right
> across Usenet then they full deserved to be called a
> dog-felching wank stain.
> Yes, he's entitled to his opinion, but everybody else is
> equally entitled to the opinion that the OP should stick
> it up his arse.
> Anyway, insulting the opinions of others is what made
> Usenet great.

Ah, foul language. The last resort of those who know they've lost the
argument.


Ivor

"Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Ah, foul language. The last resort of those who know they've lost the
> argument.

You're mistaken, we weren't arguing, I was merely telling you to **** off.

Sorry if this was confusing for you.

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]lid
says...
>
>
> "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in
> message news:[email protected]
> > "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > > He's entitled to his opinion. I grant you this isn't
> > > really the place for it, but he's still entitled to it
> > > without insults from you.
> >
> > Where does this entitlement come from then? Seems to me
> > that if some **** wants to post pages of bollocks right
> > across Usenet then they full deserved to be called a
> > dog-felching wank stain.
> > Yes, he's entitled to his opinion, but everybody else is
> > equally entitled to the opinion that the OP should stick
> > it up his arse.
> > Anyway, insulting the opinions of others is what made
> > Usenet great.
>
> Ah, foul language. The last resort of those who know they've lost the
> argument.
>
>
>

You are mistaken.

"Dog-felching wank stain" is beyond bad-language as we know it.

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:
>
>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...

>>> Do you really have to be so offensive?
>>
>>What's it to you, ****-face?
>
> I'd watch your mouth you speccy-faced northern twat.

Name your roundabout, you lily-livered southern pufter!

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in
> message <[email protected]>:
>
> > <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > > message <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > > > > Do you really have to be so offensive?
> > > >
> > > > What's it to you, ****-face?
> > >
> > > I'd watch your mouth you speccy-faced northern twat.
> >
> > Name your roundabout, you lily-livered southern pufter!
>
> M42, J3. 18.45 tomorrow.
>
> I'll be on the scooter.

Can I come and watch..?!

Ivor

"AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]
> "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > Ah, foul language. The last resort of those who know
> > they've lost the argument.
>
> You're mistaken, we weren't arguing, I was merely telling
> you to **** off.
> Sorry if this was confusing for you.

Or those who've just lost it.

Ivor

"Bikini Whacks" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected]lid says...
> >
> >
> > "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > message news:[email protected]
> > > "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > > He's entitled to his opinion. I grant you this isn't
> > > > really the place for it, but he's still entitled to
> > > > it without insults from you.
> > >
> > > Where does this entitlement come from then? Seems to
> > > me that if some **** wants to post pages of bollocks
> > > right across Usenet then they full deserved to be
> > > called a dog-felching wank stain.
> > > Yes, he's entitled to his opinion, but everybody else
> > > is equally entitled to the opinion that the OP should
> > > stick it up his arse.
> > > Anyway, insulting the opinions of others is what made
> > > Usenet great.
> >
> > Ah, foul language. The last resort of those who know
> > they've lost the argument.
> >
> >
> >
>
> You are mistaken.
>
> "Dog-felching wank stain" is beyond bad-language as we
> know it.

Yes, what *does* 'felching' mean..? It's not in my dictionary of slang,
but it is an old one.

Ivor

"Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Yes, what *does* 'felching' mean..? It's not in my dictionary of slang,
> but it is an old one.

Ah, happy to help.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=felching

You probably don't want to be eating while you read, if you're a sensitive
little flower.

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]lid
says...
>
>
> "Bikini Whacks" <[email protected]> wrote in
> message news:[email protected]
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected]lid says...
> > >
> > >
> > > "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > > message news:[email protected]
> > > > "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > > He's entitled to his opinion. I grant you this isn't
> > > > > really the place for it, but he's still entitled to
> > > > > it without insults from you.
> > > >
> > > > Where does this entitlement come from then? Seems to
> > > > me that if some **** wants to post pages of bollocks
> > > > right across Usenet then they full deserved to be
> > > > called a dog-felching wank stain.
> > > > Yes, he's entitled to his opinion, but everybody else
> > > > is equally entitled to the opinion that the OP should
> > > > stick it up his arse.
> > > > Anyway, insulting the opinions of others is what made
> > > > Usenet great.
> > >
> > > Ah, foul language. The last resort of those who know
> > > they've lost the argument.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > You are mistaken.
> >
> > "Dog-felching wank stain" is beyond bad-language as we
> > know it.
>
> Yes, what *does* 'felching' mean..? It's not in my dictionary of slang,
> but it is an old one.
>
> Ivor
>
>
>
You may want reach for something solid.

Ok, it's sticking small rodents up one's arse for sexual gratification.

You'll be needing a short length of pipe wider than the critter you plan
to "entertain".

Also a piece of string tied to it's tail is advisable if working alone.

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "AndrewR" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:

>>Name your roundabout, you lily-livered southern pufter!
>
> M42, J3. 18.45 tomorrow.

Does it have to be tomorrow? I'm down in Milton Keynes towards the middle
of this month could I kick your teeth in then?

> I'll be on the scooter.

I might be on the bike, but I equally might bring the car as I'm down for a
couple of days and need to bring a suit.

"Bikini Whacks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]lid
> says...

>> Yes, what *does* 'felching' mean..? It's not in my dictionary of slang,
>> but it is an old one.

> Ok, it's sticking small rodents up one's arse for sexual gratification.

No, no - that's "gerbiling".

Felching is sucking your own semen from your lover's anus, perhaps after
warming them up with a little light rimming first.

Sheesh, and people say the use of bad language is the sign of a limited
vocabulary.

In article <[email protected]>, AndrewR says...
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...

> > I'll be on the scooter.
>
> I might be on the bike, but I equally might bring the car as I'm down for a
> couple of days and need to bring a suit.

Have you really put on so much weight your suit only fits in a car?