Reverse number search?

Does anyone know if (by hook or by crook) it is possible to do a reverse
search on a UK mobile telephone number (assuming it is not ex-directory)?

Mike.

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:05:24 GMT, "Kaptain Apokalypse"
<apokalypse561@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Does anyone know if (by hook or by crook) it is possible to do a reverse
>search on a UK mobile telephone number (assuming it is not ex-directory)?
>
>Mike.
>

Are you police? Then yes.

Otherwise, no.

--
http://www.unimobiles.com | http://www.unimobiles.com/auctions
UK Specialists in Refurbished Mobile Phones & Accessories

"Unimobiles.com" <sales@unimobiles.com> wrote in message
news:vajgd2tquqci1sle5i65u53f8epkcb034t@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:05:24 GMT, "Kaptain Apokalypse"
> <apokalypse561@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Does anyone know if (by hook or by crook) it is possible to do a reverse
>>search on a UK mobile telephone number (assuming it is not ex-directory)?
>>
>>Mike.
>>
>
> Are you police? Then yes.
>
> Otherwise, no.

Well, I know that such searches are indeed available to non-LEOs (for
instance, the old BT Phone Disc used to have a "patch" that allowed user to
do this), but what I was fishing for was information on where to look. Not
entirely legal I already know, but I'm sure we're not all whiter-then-white
here

"Kaptain Apokalypse" <apokalypse561@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:UIWBg.51646$oo2.37648@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net
> Does anyone know if (by hook or by crook) it is possible
> to do a reverse search on a UK mobile telephone number
> (assuming it is not ex-directory)?

It's possible, but not legal.

Ivor

"Kaptain Apokalypse" <apokalypse561@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:4J%Bg.33454$WY2.12737@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net

[snip]

> Well, I know that such searches are indeed available to
> non-LEOs (for instance, the old BT Phone Disc used to
> have a "patch" that allowed user to do this), but what I
> was fishing for was information on where to look. Not
> entirely legal I already know, but I'm sure we're not all
> whiter-then-white here

You may not be, but if you expect anyone here to openly assist you in
breaking the law, think again.

Is that why you're hiding behind a pseudonym and not using your real name,
I wonder..? Not to worry, it's possible to do reverse lookups on IP
addresses also.


Ivor

"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
news:4jru7gF9ccbjU1@individual.net...
> "Kaptain Apokalypse" <apokalypse561@hotmail.com> wrote in
> message news:4J%Bg.33454$WY2.12737@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net
>
> [snip]
>
> You may not be, but if you expect anyone here to openly assist you in
> breaking the law, think again.
>
> Is that why you're hiding behind a pseudonym and not using your real name,
> I wonder..? Not to worry, it's possible to do reverse lookups on IP
> addresses also.
>
>
> Ivor


Oh gawd, another Internet vigilante! To save you some time son, here are my
message headers:

Path:
newsbetxt1-gui.ntli.net!newspeer1-win.ntli.net!newsfe4-gui.ntli.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Reply-To: "Kaptain Apokalypse" <apokalypse561@hotmail.com>
From: "Kaptain Apokalypse" <apokalypse561@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Reverse number search?
Lines: 6
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <UIWBg.51646$oo2.37648@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:05:24 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.110.11.24
X-Trace: newsfe4-gui.ntli.net 1155020724 81.110.11.24 (Tue, 08 Aug 2006
08:05:24 BST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:05:24 BST
Organization: NTL
Xref: newspeer1-win.ntli.net uk.telecom.mobile:388844
X-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:08:43 BST (newsbetxt1-gui.ntli.net)


In case you're new at email tracing (I'm an old hand at it as it is part of
my job), I'll help you out:

My ISP is NTL and my node location is Birkenhead. The IP number you need to
be interested in is this one: 81.110.11.24

An just FYI, Mike is my real name. I have done absolutely nothing illegal
(yet). The nearest thing to any kid of abuse I suppose is assuming that you
are a complete tit, but going by your previous posts I doubt very much my
assumption is incorrectan. I would wager it is actual fact.

Oh, and in case you want to report this message, the abuse dept is
abuse@ntlworld.com My advice to you kid is don't bother. I haven't
actually done anything here that goes against the NTL TOS, but please do
feel free to waste your time.

Now crawl back to your pathetic little cave and don't bother me again.

Cheers,

Mike.

"Kaptain Apokalypse" <apokalypse561@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:tN3Cg.6074$vl5.222@newsfe4-win.ntli.net

[snip]

> Oh gawd, another Internet vigilante! To save you some
> time son, here are my message headers:

Vigilante..? Who, me..? Not at all. I just stated you will be unlikely to
find anyone here willing to assist you in doing anything illegal.

BTW my father is dead, why are you calling me son..?

> An just FYI, Mike is my real name. I have done
> absolutely nothing illegal (yet). The nearest thing to
> any kid of abuse I suppose is assuming that you are a
> complete tit, but going by your previous posts I doubt
> very much my assumption is incorrectan. I would wager it
> is actual fact.

Ah, abuse. It'll be foul language next.

> Oh, and in case you want to report this message, the
> abuse dept is abuse@ntlworld.com My advice to you kid is
> don't bother. I haven't actually done anything here that
> goes against the NTL TOS, but please do feel free to
> waste your time.

Time spent doing something you enjoy is never wasted :-)

Although I can't be bothered in your case.

> Now crawl back to your pathetic little cave and don't
> bother me again.

Ah, more abuse.

BTW if you're bothered, that's your problem. I'm not bothered at all..!

Ivor