Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Sam Nelson
    Guest

    Re: Say No to Lenny....

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Lenny <[email protected]> writes:
    > No, I just post interesting, factual and science based information
    > relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR theme.


    When does that start?

    > These ARE the right
    > groups no? I THINK SO.


    Are you a vegan, by any chance?
    --
    SAm.



    See More: Say No to Lenny....




  2. #17
    Bob Eager
    Guest

    Re: Say No to Lenny....

    On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:54:29 UTC, [email protected] (Sam Nelson) wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Lenny <[email protected]> writes:
    > > No, I just post interesting


    Not interesting

    > > factual


    Fictional, more like

    > > and science based


    Pseudo based

    > > information
    > > relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR theme.

    >
    > When does that start?
    >
    > > These ARE the right
    > > groups no? I THINK SO.

    >
    > Are you a vegan, by any chance?


    He's probably a fruitarian.

    (actually, that probably explains why he's a fruit cake)

    --
    [ 7'ism - a condition by which the sufferer experiences an inability
    to give concise answers, express reasoned argument or opinion.
    Usually accompanied by silly noises and gestures - incurable, early
    euthanasia recommended. ]



  3. #18
    Clint Sharp
    Guest

    Re: Say No to Lenny....

    In message <[email protected]>, Lenny <[email protected]>
    writes
    >I don't care about you and "the regulars" ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!
    >
    >I have most of "them" plonked.
    >
    >No, I just post interesting, factual and science based information
    >relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR theme. These ARE the right
    >groups no? I THINK SO.

    Are you actually going to get the message that nobody wants this pseudo
    science you post, most of it is so shoddy, biased or just totally
    unscientific that it's laughable. If there truly is an issue with WiFi
    then post some research that's independent, not from someone trying to
    sell a magic bullet cure for the problem or is just peer reviewed and up
    to the accepted scientific standards. You are wrong about these being
    the right groups as well, but I guess you did your research as well as
    the people who publish the 'scientific' papers you punt as factual.
    >
    >bye.

    I'm not going anywhere so I can only guess that you're leaving, please
    don't be offended if we kick the door so it hits your arse on the way
    out. Oh, before you go, can you post the information that you've been
    asked for so many times, proof of your involvement in scientific
    research. Thanks.
    >
    >
    >


    --
    Clint Sharp



  4. #19
    Dave Higton
    Guest

    Re: Say No to Lenny....

    In message <[email protected]>
    Lenny <[email protected]> wrote:

    > No, I just post interesting, factual and science based information
    > relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR theme.


    I don't think you understand what science is. Unfortunately
    you /believe/ you do.

    Dave



  5. #20
    Ivor Jones
    Guest

    Re: Say No to Lenny....



    "Lenny" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]

    [snip]

    > I don't care about you and "the regulars"
    > ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!
    >
    > I have most of "them" plonked.


    It's a pity you don't have everybody plonked.

    > No, I just post interesting, factual and science based
    > information


    Oh, right. We must all be wrong then.

    > relating to cell phones and wifi on the RFR
    > theme. These ARE the right groups no? I THINK SO.


    Nobody else does.

    Ivor





    PS you said you plonked me ages ago, so let's see if you reply to this.





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12