Jill Dando

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> And how would a lap top in london, send from this fixed IP address?..

I can think of about five ways right off the top of my head, the easiest
of which is that someone else was posting for you and providing you with
an alibi.

--
marc

"I will eat RTD's cock, assuming it is on offer." -- Aggy

---

› See More: Jill Dando

On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 03:59:50 +0100, The Natural Philosopher passed an
empty day by writing:

> Gandalph wrote:
>> "The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Gandalph wrote:
>>>> "The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> Right: what evidence is there that he DID NOT do it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not a lot at all.
>>>> So working on the same system that someone is guilty until there is
>> enough
>>>> evidence to prove innocence, what evidence do we have to prove that
>>>> you didn't do it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Probably the fact that I could provide demonstrable evidence I was
>>> somewhere else at the time. Probably here in fact.
>>
>> That doesn't prove a thing. Ever hear of a bit of technology called a
>> lap top computer? I think you should be sent down for seven years as
>> your proof you didn't so it is so weak. ;-)
>>
>>
> And how would a lap top in london, send from this fixed IP address?..

1: Via a proxy
2: Scripted remote post set to run at a given time
3: IP spoofing
4: Logging in via a remote desktop/vnc and doing it
5: Getting someone else to do it for you

I think the only reason you are blaming Barry George is because you are
the real culprit.

--
I collect spam + please send it to: [email protected]

"Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:20:48 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>Ron Hicks wrote:
>>> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>>
>>No: there was insufficeint sound evdence to maintain a conviction on
>>Barry george, that's all.
>>
>>>
>>> So WHO the hell did?
>>>
>>
>>Barry George.
>
> So can/will he be rearrested for it?
>

If he subsequently boasts about it he might be brought in again on the new
double jeopardy rule.

=- \/\/ayne =- wrote:
> "alexd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:43:49 +0100, DerekF wrote:
>>
>>> Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
>>> never to hear again.... Diana and Dando. Derek.
>> That's three.
>
> Don't be daft. "Derek" was the posters name!
>
> Regards,
>
> Wayne
>
>

The medal is in the post.

"The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Klunk wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:27:57 +0100, The Natural Philosopher passed an
>> empty day by writing:
>>
>>> Ron Hicks wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:20:48 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ron Hicks wrote:
<snip>
> Or equally, here's a mentally disturbed nutter, with a history of stalking
> women, who was in the area, and seems to have been using a gun..
>
>> High profile case, bunch of idiots not knowing what to do, grab someone
>> so they don't look stupid. 8 years down the line not only do they look
>> stupid, but bent too. Some things never change.
>
> Right: what evidence is there that he DID NOT do it?
>
>
The total lack of forensic evidence left at the scene,
the act of a professional hit man

Steve Terry

On 2008-08-01, Ron Hicks <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:43:49 +0100, "DerekF"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>>>
>>> So WHO the hell did?
>>>
>>Blooming heck, I just hope that he does not now get damages for his time in
>>the Jug. He is an obvious nutter who will forever be a public danger. So
>>many people now get off due to persistent lawyers out to make their name and
>>money without a care about Justice.
>>Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
>>never to hear again.... Diana and Dando.
>>Derek.
>
> Barry George will now get £MILLIONS in compensation from this.

Minus the board and lodging charge, set at such rates that the Ritz
would call expensive.

--
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell Eridani Star System
MailStripper - http://www.MailStripper.eu/ - SMTP spam filter
Second Number - http://secondnumber.matrixnetwork.co.uk/

"The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>and seems to have been using a gun..
>
>
There was no such evidence.

"The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Gandalph wrote:
>> "The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Gandalph wrote:
>>>> "The Natural Philosopher" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> Right: what evidence is there that he DID NOT do it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not a lot at all.
>>>> So working on the same system that someone is guilty until there is
>> enough
>>>> evidence to prove innocence, what evidence do we have to prove that you
>>>> didn't do it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Probably the fact that I could provide demonstrable evidence I was
>>> somewhere else at the time. Probably here in fact.
>>
>> That doesn't prove a thing. Ever hear of a bit of technology called a lap
>> top computer? I think you should be sent down for seven years as your
>> proof
>> you didn't so it is so weak. ;-)
>>
>>
> And how would a lap top in london, send from this fixed IP address?..
>
Can you prove it was you sat there? May be you had an accomplice.