Jill Dando

Apparently Barry George didn't do it.

So WHO the hell did?

---

› See More: Jill Dando

"Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>
> So WHO the hell did?
>
Blooming heck, I just hope that he does not now get damages for his time in
the Jug. He is an obvious nutter who will forever be a public danger. So
many people now get off due to persistent lawyers out to make their name and
money without a care about Justice.
Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
never to hear again.... Diana and Dando.
Derek.


Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:43:49 +0100, DerekF wrote:

> Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
> never to hear again.... Diana and Dando. Derek.

That's three.

--
<http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ([email protected])
18:50:05 up 20 days, 21:26, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01
Convergence, n: The act of using separate DSL circuits for voice and data

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:43:49 +0100, "DerekF"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>>
>> So WHO the hell did?
>>
>Blooming heck, I just hope that he does not now get damages for his time in
>the Jug. He is an obvious nutter who will forever be a public danger. So
>many people now get off due to persistent lawyers out to make their name and
>money without a care about Justice.
>Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
>never to hear again.... Diana and Dando.
>Derek.

Barry George will now get £MILLIONS in compensation from this.

"DerekF" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>>
>> So WHO the hell did?
>>
> Blooming heck, I just hope that he does not now get damages for his time
> in the Jug. He is an obvious nutter who will forever be a public danger.
> So many people now get off due to persistent lawyers out to make their
> name and money without a care about Justice.
> Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
> never to hear again.... Diana and Dando.
> Derek.
>
You stupid retarded little man! you know nothing of this case, the original
conviction came about because of one yes just one spec of gun shot residue
found inside a pocket of one of his jackets. Experts around the world state
that one spec on its own is not sufficient to be even relevant let alone
used as evidence in a murder case as it could have and most likely did come
from the hand or clothing of a member of the search team or forensics team.

Also this man had an IQ of just 75, which while obviously superior to yours,
is not high enough to commit a murder and not leave a single shred of
physical evidence. Also there was evidence presented at the first trial that
turned out to be gross exaggeration and lies.

Remember he was found not guilty on the best evidence the crown had. Which
was in the words of the judge purely circumstantial.

"Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:43:49 +0100, "DerekF"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>>>
>>> So WHO the hell did?
>>>
>>Blooming heck, I just hope that he does not now get damages for his time
>>in
>>the Jug. He is an obvious nutter who will forever be a public danger. So
>>many people now get off due to persistent lawyers out to make their name
>>and
>>money without a care about Justice.
>>Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
>>never to hear again.... Diana and Dando.
>>Derek.
>
> Barry George will now get £MILLIONS in compensation from this.
>
No less than a million and he deserves it.

Ron Hicks wrote:
> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.

No: there was insufficeint sound evdence to maintain a conviction on
Barry george, that's all.

>
> So WHO the hell did?
>

Barry George.

On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:20:48 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Ron Hicks wrote:
>> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>
>No: there was insufficeint sound evdence to maintain a conviction on
>Barry george, that's all.
>
>>
>> So WHO the hell did?
>>
>
>Barry George.

So can/will he be rearrested for it?

On 01 Aug 2008 17:50:41 GMT, alexd <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:43:49 +0100, DerekF wrote:
>
>> Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
>> never to hear again.... Diana and Dando. Derek.
>
>That's three.

LMAO

"Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>
> So WHO the hell did?
>

I don't know Ron, but it's got nothing to do with UK Mobiles, try UK.LEGAL.*

Regards,

Wayne

"alexd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:43:49 +0100, DerekF wrote:
>
> > Their are two people no longer in this world whose names I would prefer
> > never to hear again.... Diana and Dando. Derek.
>
> That's three.

Don't be daft. "Derek" was the posters name!

Regards,

Wayne

"=- \/\/ayne =-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Ron Hicks" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
> >
> > So WHO the hell did?
> >
>
> I don't know Ron, but it's got nothing to do with UK Mobiles, try
UK.LEGAL.*

Or even Broadband... Sorry!

regards

Wayne

In news:[email protected],
Ron Hicks <[email protected]> typed, for some strange, unexplained reason:
: Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
:
: So WHO the hell did?

I have no idea, but what has it got to do with any of the many groups
you've spammed with this..?

Ivor

On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:01:22 +0100, Ron Hicks <[email protected]> wrote:

> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>
> So WHO the hell did?


Was it Cyril Freezer?

Fred X

Ron Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:20:48 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Ron Hicks wrote:
>>> Apparently Barry George didn't do it.
>> No: there was insufficeint sound evdence to maintain a conviction on
>> Barry george, that's all.
>>
>>> So WHO the hell did?
>>>
>> Barry George.
>
> So can/will he be rearrested for it?
>
Not enough evidence is there?