"kdt" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "CozmicDebris" <isheforreal> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>> Did you learn anything about statistics and the uselessness of self
>>> selected samples?
>>

>
>> Based on the advertising? No user replaceable advertising, no GPS,
>> no high speed wireless data are a few that were never addressed in
>> the advertising, and based on some experimentation are not addressed
>> in the sales pitch unles specifically asked about.
>
> What advertisement talks about things that there product doesn't have?

Notice I mentioned a combination of advertising and sales pitch. The
salespeople aren't willing to point out potential pitfalls.

> Are you saying that people who are going to shell out $599 for a phone
> + $1440 over a two year contract didn't have sense enough to type
> "iphone" on google and see opinions on the first page?

I am saying just that, as well over 75% of the people buying it would never
do that. They saw the ads and bought it on the merits of those ads. Hell,
the fanbois didn't know some of the missing functionality until after the
release of the phone, despite being such "experts" in the field.


> Can you find a single *scientific, statistically accurate* survey that
> shows mass disatifaction with the iPhone?

Wait a minute- I'm not looking for statistically accurate material. The
comment was made that Apple users are always delighted with the products
they buy. I am simply showing that this is far from the case. If you're
so much of a fanboi to dismiss the information bacause it may not be
statistically accurate- oh well.

As I said in a previous post, macforums, an avowed fanboi site, has a poll
of their own, which has similar results- notice I use the word "poll" and
not "survey". I understand the accuracy of the information, but don't
dismiss the general message because of that.

>
>
>
>
>



› See More: Apple To Own Wireless 700Mhz Network