CNet agrees, Voyager is better than the iPhone!

http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html

read it and weep Oxtard

---

› See More: CNet agrees, Voyager is better than the iPhone!

In article <[email protected]>,
Jon <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html

It looks a bit bulky and awkward.
Sorry, but iPhone is still the King.
Keep trying.

anon wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Jon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html
>
> It looks a bit bulky and awkward.
> Sorry, but iPhone is still the King.
> Keep trying.
Yea, the iPhone won in appearance, but loses in lots of other things (no
MMS? Not 3G? those things are common in 99% of newer phones!)

anon <[email protected]> wrote:

> > http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html

> It looks a bit bulky and awkward.
> Sorry, but iPhone is still the King.


I Agree. How is it's Wi-Fi? I thought so.
Yup, I'll stick with the iPhone in this battle.

Henry Higins wrote:
> anon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html
>
>> It looks a bit bulky and awkward.
>> Sorry, but iPhone is still the King.
>
>
> I Agree. How is it's Wi-Fi? I thought so.
> Yup, I'll stick with the iPhone in this battle.
WiFi always depends on what the connection is on the other side! I
mean, someone could have their Wifi router hooked up to a dialup
connection, or it could be a trap! (if its not a free public hotspot or
your own)

In article <[email protected]>,
anon <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> Jon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html
>
> It looks a bit bulky and awkward.
> Sorry, but iPhone is still the King.
> Keep trying.

59 to 63 points? We're supposed to "weep" about 4 pts difference?

Bulk of unit and no WIFI lose it for me.

What kind of goofy holster do you use to carry it?

Love that I can do all my syncing through iTunes, don't understand
others' problems with that.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

In article <[email protected]>,
anon <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> Jon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html
>
> It looks a bit bulky and awkward.
> Sorry, but iPhone is still the King.
> Keep trying.

Also don't understand the "hiss" problem they all talked about. Voice is
clear and clean on mine.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

At 08 Dec 2007 13:06:25 -0800 Kurt wrote:

> Love that I can do all my syncing through iTunes, don't understand
> others' problems with that.

My only problem with it is you can only do your synching with iTunes, via a
cable. BT, WiFi, and/or OTA sync would be preferable additions. When I
update my contacts or calendar, it immediately syncs to my wife's phone and
my PCs via Exchange. Technology is supposed make life easy...

4phun wrote:
> On Dec 8, 1:34 pm, Jon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html
>>
>> read it and weep Oxtard
>
> Mandatory random drug testing should be instantly implemented at
> CNet.
>
> Only a person without full control of their senses would even remotely
> come to the conclusion Voyager was anything other than a glorified
> brew phone like the old Envy. Nothing remotely like an iPhone and its
> Apple technology.
>
Then how did it beat the iPhone?

Oh wait, is it because its better than the iPhone? I think yes!

Jon <[email protected]> wrote in news:fjeo37$mrk$1
@registered.motzarella.org:

> http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html

I ran through all the rounds and low-and-behold right there to
the right of the WINNER page is this URL that just blew the hell
out of ANY credibility CNet might have had with this "review"...

Right there on the last page was this goddamned VERIZON ADD
HAWKING VOYAGER! How stupid can a company BE?! Reviewing it's
own advertizer? The whole thing was a VOYAGER AD!!

http://adlog.com.com/adlog/c/r=11438&s=771945&o=
8900:3488:11281:11399:&h=cn&p=2&b=25&l=en_US&site=7&pt=4370&nd=
11399&pid=&cid=332&pp=200&e=3&rqid=00c18-ad-
e104738CD1011DF273C&orh=reviews.cnet.com&oepartner=&epartner=&cpn
module=&count=&ra=24.214.22.122&t=
2007.12.08.22.52.01/http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v2|38EE|0|0
|*|k;159520915;0-0;0;22069240;31-1|1;23374783|23392636|1;;%
3fhttp://products.vzw.com/index.aspx?
id=rlp&site=next&phone=voyager

Larry
--
You know I'm no iPhoney lover. I think they both suck, but
Voyager sucks more because it's saddled with VERIZON, the lowest
of the low....

4phun <[email protected]> wrote in news:7e68302d-9a13-4599-
[email protected]:

> Mandatory random drug testing should be instantly implemented
at
> CNet.
>
> Only a person without full control of their senses would even
remotely
> come to the conclusion Voyager was anything other than a
glorified
> brew phone like the old Envy. Nothing remotely like an iPhone
and its
> Apple technology.
>
>

Naw....Cnet is hawking what its PAYING ADVERTISER IS SELLING!

This was on the WINNER page when I read it:


http://adlog.com.com/adlog/c/r=11438&s=771945&o=
8900:3488:11281:11399:&h=cn&p=2&b=25&l=en_US&site=7&pt=4370&nd=
11399&pid=&cid=332&pp=200&e=3&rqid=00c18-ad-
e104738CD1011DF273C&orh=reviews.cnet.com&oepartner=&epartner=&cpn
module=&count=&ra=24.214.22.122&t=
2007.12.08.22.52.01/http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v2|38EE|0|0
|*|k;159520915;0-0;0;22069240;31-1|1;23374783|23392636|1;;%
3fhttp://products.vzw.com/index.aspx?
id=rlp&site=next&phone=voyager

CNet is selling VERIZON...right on the WINNER page! It's got to
be the STUPIDEST thing I've ever seen them do!

Credibilty = 0
................................PRICELESS.

Larry
--
Isn't it ironic that the same ISPs that are telling you
you're downloads threaten their networks......
.....are testing 100Gbps TV to sell on the SAME systems?
http://tinyurl.com/27qx3v

Larry wrote:
> Jon <[email protected]> wrote in news:fjeo37$mrk$1
> @registered.motzarella.org:
>
>> http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html
>
> I ran through all the rounds and low-and-behold right there to
> the right of the WINNER page is this URL that just blew the hell
> out of ANY credibility CNet might have had with this "review"...
>
> Right there on the last page was this goddamned VERIZON ADD
> HAWKING VOYAGER! How stupid can a company BE?! Reviewing it's
> own advertizer? The whole thing was a VOYAGER AD!!
>
> http://adlog.com.com/adlog/c/r=11438&s=771945&o=
> 8900:3488:11281:11399:&h=cn&p=2&b=25&l=en_US&site=7&pt=4370&nd=
> 11399&pid=&cid=332&pp=200&e=3&rqid=00c18-ad-
> e104738CD1011DF273C&orh=reviews.cnet.com&oepartner=&epartner=&cpn
> module=&count=&ra=24.214.22.122&t=
> 2007.12.08.22.52.01/http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v2|38EE|0|0
> |*|k;159520915;0-0;0;22069240;31-1|1;23374783|23392636|1;;%
> 3fhttp://products.vzw.com/index.aspx?
> id=rlp&site=next&phone=voyager
>
> Larry
Strange, when I go to the first page, I see iPhone ads on the bottom of
the page....

Larry wrote:
> Jon <[email protected]> wrote in news:fjeo37$mrk$1
> @registered.motzarella.org:
>
>> http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html
>
> I ran through all the rounds and low-and-behold right there to
> the right of the WINNER page is this URL that just blew the hell
> out of ANY credibility CNet might have had with this "review"...
>
> Right there on the last page was this goddamned VERIZON ADD
> HAWKING VOYAGER! How stupid can a company BE?! Reviewing it's
> own advertizer? The whole thing was a VOYAGER AD!!
>
> http://adlog.com.com/adlog/c/r=11438&s=771945&o=
> 8900:3488:11281:11399:&h=cn&p=2&b=25&l=en_US&site=7&pt=4370&nd=
> 11399&pid=&cid=332&pp=200&e=3&rqid=00c18-ad-
> e104738CD1011DF273C&orh=reviews.cnet.com&oepartner=&epartner=&cpn
> module=&count=&ra=24.214.22.122&t=
> 2007.12.08.22.52.01/http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v2|38EE|0|0
> |*|k;159520915;0-0;0;22069240;31-1|1;23374783|23392636|1;;%
> 3fhttp://products.vzw.com/index.aspx?
> id=rlp&site=next&phone=voyager
>
> Larry

Strange, at the bottom of every page, I see 3 iPhone ads!

Kurt <[email protected]> wrote:

> > It looks a bit bulky and awkward.
> > Sorry, but iPhone is still the King.
> > Keep trying.
>
> 59 to 63 points? We're supposed to "weep" about 4 pts difference?
>
> Bulk of unit and no WIFI lose it for me.
>
> What kind of goofy holster do you use to carry it?
>
> Love that I can do all my syncing through iTunes, don't understand
> others' problems with that.

i think its funny they forgot mention the iphone has over double the
battery life, a better screen, much larger screen, and is quite a bit
thinner.

480 x 320 pixels iphone

400 x 240 pixels lg voyager

Jon wrote:
> http://reviews.cnet.com/4370-11399_7-332-101.html
>
> read it and weep Oxtard

The lack of WiFi on the Voyager is a deal killer for many people. With
an iPhone, you can get it unlocked and use it on prepaid for voice, and
use WiFi for data, and have a relatively low cost device and a low
recurring cost. With the Voyager, you must sign up for an expensive data
plan to use on on Verizon's 3G network.

If you're going to sign up for a carrier's data plan then the Voyager is
the winner, since Verizon's 3G network is far faster than AT&T's EDGE
network. But part of this advantage will be short-lived, as the next
generation iPhone will be 3G. Verizon will continue to have a data
advantage due to their superior data network, and EVDO is marginally
faster than HSDPA.

The real competition, feature-wise, to the iPhone is the HTC
Mogul/XV6800. But Verizon insists that you sign up for a data plan to
buy it with any discounts.