reply to discussion
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    CozmicDebris
    Guest

    Re: "I pick it up [a friend's iPhone] and start crying"

    Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-
    [email protected]:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:
    >
    >> 4phun <[email protected]> wrote in
    >> news:214c7059-bc10-47e7-9a41-3f6ffe247644

    @e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
    >>
    >> > On Dec 16, 11:30 pm, Todd Allcock <[email protected]>
    >> > wrote:
    >> >> At 17 Dec 2007 04:00:51 +0000 Larry wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> > Why did you need iTunes to COPY an MP3 file to the memory?
    >> >>
    >> >> For the iPhone it's needed- for iPods it's optional.
    >> >>
    >> >> > What if I want
    >> >> > to copy 250 MP3 files to a folder called ROCK? Can I click and
    >> >> > drag them to the phone or do I click and drag them to iTunes??
    >> >>
    >> >> Actually with iPods you can, as you've been told countless times.
    >> >>
    >> >> > Why do I need iTunes
    >> >> > to load it, anyways. They're just MP3 files.
    >> >>
    >> >> Again, other than the iPhone,you don't. iTunes is for convenience
    >> >> (controlling which files get synch'd- useful in selecting WHICH

    4GB
    >> >> of your 50GB of music gets transfered,) conversion (automatically
    >> >> converts non-iPod format files, like Windows Media files, into
    >> >> iPod-playable files) and for DRM'd content (not all of us steal

    our
    >> >> music from Usenet.)
    >> >>
    >> >> > Damned iPod crapware...
    >> >>
    >> >> Personally I'm no fan of iTunes- for all of Apple fans' flak about
    >> >> intuitiveness, I find iTunes incomprehensible- I use it so seldom
    >> >> that I have to relearn it each time I use it (like you, I

    generally
    >> >> transfer files to my players manually via a file manager when

    able.)
    >> >> I store my music in .wma format to save disk space vs. MP3. All

    of
    >> >> my portables except a second-hand iPod Nano play .wma, so for me,
    >> >> iTunes is more convenient handling the conversion than manually
    >> >> re-ripping or converting back to MP3 the songs I want to stick on

    the
    >> >> Nano.
    >> >
    >> > I find iTunes to be darned slick for what it does. I have used it

    to
    >> > rip countless CDs over the last two years. The programmable SMART

    PLAY
    >> > LISTS are fantastic As a tool for managing pod casts it is hard to
    >> > beat. As a matter of fact I am convinced it can't be beat if you

    have
    >> > an iPod. The two take advantage of each others strengths. It takes
    >> > awhile to really learn all the neat stuff that can be done Some

    people
    >> > don't have what it takes to master iTunes due to the generally lax
    >> > educational system now in the USA.
    >> >
    >> > .
    >> >

    >>
    >> Weren't today's tenured teachers and administrators taught on Apple
    >> COmputers? That would explain the lax educational system.
    >>
    >> iTunes is an idiot toy.

    >
    > Enjoy your Zune. LOL
    >


    Where did I say that I had one?

    You sure make a lot of incorrect assumptions.



    See More: "I pick it up [a friend's iPhone] and start crying"




  2. #17
    Todd Allcock
    Guest

    Re: "I pick it up [a friend's iPhone] and start crying"

    At 17 Dec 2007 16:02:08 -0800 4phun wrote:

    > It takes
    > awhile to really learn all the neat stuff that can be done Some people
    > don't have what it takes to master iTunes due to the generally lax
    > educational system now in the USA.



    So much for Apple's famed easef-use and intuitiveness if a peoduct of a
    "lax educational system" can't handle it, huh?


    As I said, I use it so seldom that learning it inside and out doesn't
    interest me- it's merely an automated conversion tool to move my WMA
    library my iPod, the least used MP3 player in my house.





  3. #18
    earthtodigi
    Guest

    Re: "I pick it up [a friend's iPhone] and start crying"

    I PICK UP MY FRIENDS MACBOOK (AND START CRYING) BECAUSE **ITUNES** IS
    SOOOOOO FRIGGIN HARD TO USE...... :drools:


    Wow, didnt this thread start with something about WinMo being terrible
    because it was too advanced, had too many features, and therefore was
    too hard to use for these simpleton mac fanboys?

    Anyways, sorry I left you guys with nothing to chew on, but I was
    busy. Anyways, this just in....

    Business Week Headline Reads: Apple's iPhone Will Fail In India. And
    Maybe Britain too.
    http://www.businessweek.com/innovate..._iphone_w.html

    Apparently, you cannot forward text messages, or send text messages to
    multiple recipients, with this 5up3r k3wl internet communications
    device called iPhone :O

    I guess that will do it with today's installment of "Things you cannot
    do with iPhone" I guess I will have to catch up with you guys later,
    right now I'm missing my Sirius stream because I needed to connect
    with BT DUN to post this, and had to disconnect my BT A2DP profile
    from my phone to my stereo in the car, causing me to miss the history
    of Howard Stern. Hey, theres two more things you cant do with iPhone,
    this job is just too easy.



  • Similar Threads







  • Quick Reply Quick Reply

    If you are already a member, please login above.