reply to discussion
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    4phun
    Guest
    http://www.youtube.com/v/Amlti7Wm16c...1-1_1153895994',
    'n'

    AP News video begins with a close up of the accident caught by an
    iPhone. I had to replay this a couple of times to verify that it was
    really a close up of an iPhone screen at the very beginning. Picture
    good enough to be broadcast on commercial TV, that is the iPhone.

    As heavy equipment tore wreckage from a CTA station Friday, police
    began scouring surveillance video to figure out why a semitrailer
    truck sped through a crowd of pedestrians and slammed into the
    station's entryway.



    See More: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday




  2. #2
    Jer
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday

    4phun wrote:
    > http://www.youtube.com/v/Amlti7Wm16c...1-1_1153895994',
    > 'n'
    >
    > AP News video begins with a close up of the accident caught by an
    > iPhone. I had to replay this a couple of times to verify that it was
    > really a close up of an iPhone screen at the very beginning. Picture
    > good enough to be broadcast on commercial TV, that is the iPhone.
    >
    > As heavy equipment tore wreckage from a CTA station Friday, police
    > began scouring surveillance video to figure out why a semitrailer
    > truck sped through a crowd of pedestrians and slammed into the
    > station's entryway.



    Yup, and just like broadcast TV, it looks like ****.

    --
    jer
    email reply - I am not a 'ten'



  3. #3
    Todd Allcock
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday


    "4phun" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:7353d3ae-b18c-4fbf-a635-eaa2335f454c@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
    > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Amlti7Wm16c [fixed your link]
    >
    > AP News video begins with a close up of the accident caught by an
    > iPhone. I had to replay this a couple of times to verify that it was
    > really a close up of an iPhone screen at the very beginning. Picture
    > good enough to be broadcast on commercial TV, that is the iPhone.


    Pity. If the bystander had a different phone, they could've shot video as
    well! ;-)





  4. #4
    4phun
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday

    On Apr 26, 2:48 pm, "Todd Allcock" <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    > "4phun" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >
    > news:7353d3ae-b18c-4fbf-a635-eaa2335f454c@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
    >
    > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Amlti7Wm16c[fixed your link]

    >
    > > AP News video begins with a close up of the accident caught by an
    > > iPhone. I had to replay this a couple of times to verify that it was
    > > really a close up of an iPhone screen at the very beginning. Picture
    > > good enough to be broadcast on commercial TV, that is the iPhone.

    >
    > Pity. If the bystander had a different phone, they could've shot video as
    > well! ;-)


    Low blow!

    ;>)



  5. #5
    Todd Allcock
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday


    "4phun" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:d4568cc2-4ff4-4187-b925-68562b006be8@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

    >> > AP News video begins with a close up of the accident caught by an
    >> > iPhone. I had to replay this a couple of times to verify that it was
    >> > really a close up of an iPhone screen at the very beginning. Picture
    >> > good enough to be broadcast on commercial TV, that is the iPhone.

    >>
    >> Pity. If the bystander had a different phone, they could've shot video
    >> as
    >> well! ;-)

    >
    > Low blow!
    >
    > ;>)


    Yeah, but I couldn't resist! ;-)

    Seriously, I understand Apple's design decision there- no mobile phone
    really takes "good" video by any standard. I suspect the iPhone could
    probably do much better than most mobiles, but it still probably wasn't up
    to Apple's standards, or reflected a level of quality they wanted associated
    with their first foray into mobile telephony. It would've been nice,
    however, if Apple had left that decision up to the end user. I've shot many
    a low-res blocky video of my kids with my Nokia and WinMo phones that are
    absolutely lousy quality (both technologically and artistically!) but they
    captured moments that would've otherwise been lost since I didn't have a
    "real" camera or camcorder with me at the time, so I'm very happy to forgive
    the low quality in return for the ability to "relive the moment."





  6. #6
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday

    4phun <[email protected]> wrote in news:7353d3ae-b18c-4fbf-a635-
    [email protected]:

    > Picture
    > good enough to be broadcast on commercial TV, that is the iPhone.
    >


    ANY crash picture is "good enough to be broadcast", including the low res
    iPhone screen picture, if it's the ONLY picture available of a news
    story....

    You are too funny, Vic.




  7. #7
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday

    "Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    > Pity. If the bystander had a different phone, they could've shot
    > video as well! ;-)
    >


    Oh, OH!!.......That hurts!......(c;




  8. #8
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday

    4phun <[email protected]> wrote in news:d4568cc2-4ff4-4187-b925-
    [email protected]:

    > Low blow!
    >
    > ;>)
    >
    >


    For $500, the damned thing should be taking HDTV movies!

    Of course, that would require STORAGE and BANDWIDTH, which is why there is
    no movie capability....especially the BANDWIDTH part...(c;




  9. #9
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday

    "Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> wrote in news:fv071n$9cu$1
    @aioe.org:

    > or reflected a level of quality they wanted associated
    > with their first foray into mobile telephony.


    Naw, it reflected AT&T's level of BANDWIDTH on EDGE. Can you imagine how
    long it would take to send a 900KB video crawling along like a snail on 2G?

    zzzZZZZzzzZZZZzzzZZZzzzZZZ




  10. #10
    Todd Allcock
    Guest

    Re: iPhone caught deadly crash in Chicago yesterday

    At 27 Apr 2008 02:07:59 +0000 Larry wrote:

    > > or reflected a level of quality they wanted associated
    > > with their first foray into mobile telephony.

    >
    > Naw, it reflected AT&T's level of BANDWIDTH on EDGE. Can you imagine how
    > long it would take to send a 900KB video crawling along like a snail on
    > 2G?
    >
    > zzzZZZZzzzZZZZzzzZZZzzzZZZ


    Well, I can tell you, since the memory card slot on my phone allows me to
    take my camera's memory card, stick it in my phone, and e-mail it over T-
    Mo's EDGE network.

    A 2MB file takes nearly 10 minutes! (While EDGE can handle up to 200kb/s
    downloads, uploading is around 30-40kb/s.) I reserve "full quality"
    picture uploads for moments of

    Having said that, many phones have an "MMS mode" that lets you take short
    clips limited in size to the carrier's MMS limit. My old Nokia 3650
    allowed up to 30 second video clips "out of the box." While an official
    Nokia software patch abolished the limit, anything over 30 secs. in length
    refused to attach to an MMS.

    My current WinMo phone, which takes videos of such low quality even Stevie
    Wonder could tell how bad they are, has two video modes- Video and MMS
    video (the latter stopping when a 300kb limit is reached.)

    Given that the current iPhone software doesn't even support MMS, I doubt
    bandwidth was a factor in the decision- Apple and AT&T could've simply
    blocked long videos from being sent as e-mail attachments. I assume Apple
    looked at the current "state of the art" and said "Ugh! Not on OUR phone!"





  • Similar Threads

    1. alt.cellular.verizon
    2. alt.cellular.verizon
    3. alt.cellular.verizon
    4. alt.cellular.verizon






  • Quick Reply Quick Reply

    If you are already a member, please login above.