Free Cases for all iPhone Users Until September 30th

In article <[email protected]>, Carl
<[email protected]> wrote:

> > it's very clearly different. john said many people use iphone without
> > cases but apple said 80% use cases, which means that the vast majority
> > *do* use cases.
>
> You're kidding, right? You're saying that 20% of all the people is not the
> same as "many people"? You are kidding or your understanding of "many" is
> not the same as mine. Just because one guy states it in relative terms and
> the other states it as an absolute (something he can't really know by the
> way), doesn't mean they're underlying meaning was different. Sorry, I can't
> get over this, that 20% cannot be construed as "many". Geez.

20% without cases is the minority. 80% who have cases is the majority.
it's simple math. certainly you can see that 80% is a lot more than
20%.

> You're defending a big company from their responsibility to own up to a
> pervasive problem, and to do the right thing and take the older versions
> back and replace them with newer, "fixed" ones?

it's not a pervasive problem. only 0.55% of calls to applecare are
about the antenna. many people do not have a problem, and can't
duplicate it even if they try.

> Toyota took the same stupid
> position recently and got their asses handed to them. All it takes is one
> life lost because an iPhone owner couldn't make that emergency call due to
> the inherent problem of the phone, and you'll learn a new perspective.

cellular service is not guaranteed.

> I hope for your sake that it's not your family filing the lawsuit,
> particularly since your own posts would mitigate their case.

there is no case.

> I am neither a fan or not of Apple. I am just a person who's tired of big
> business going into cover-up mode everytime they produce an inferior
> product.

of course you completely ignore the fact that it holds calls better
than other iphones. see anandtech's review. it was the highest rated
phone in consumer reports.

---

› See More: Free Cases for all iPhone Users Until September 30th

nospam <[email protected]> wrote in news:200720101540465824%
[email protected]d:

> it's also not really broken.
>
>

Wow, the chief apologist has really been working overtime on this screwup.


--
iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships.

Larry

"nospam" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:190720101701187349%[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, Robert A.
> Fink, M. D. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Just announced by Apple. Good move. Presumably units sold after
> > >>>> September 30th will be new production that will not need the case
> >
> > Is this true? I have not seen this stated.
>
> that's because it's speculation.
>
> what jobs said was that free cases are available through september 30,
> at which time apple will decide whether to extend the offer, or 'maybe
> we'll have a better idea.'
>
> they'll also have a lot more hard data to see just how common it really
> is.

Despite what Steve Jobs said I'll bet he will be looking at the sales
figures. But then again maybe other smartphone manufacturers will start
using external antennas themselves and then offer free cases too.

nospam wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, Carl
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> it's very clearly different. john said many people use iphone
>>> without cases but apple said 80% use cases, which means that the
>>> vast majority *do* use cases.
>>
>> You're kidding, right? You're saying that 20% of all the people is
>> not the same as "many people"? You are kidding or your
>> understanding of "many" is not the same as mine. Just because one
>> guy states it in relative terms and the other states it as an
>> absolute (something he can't really know by the way), doesn't mean
>> they're underlying meaning was different. Sorry, I can't get over
>> this, that 20% cannot be construed as "many". Geez.
>
> 20% without cases is the minority. 80% who have cases is the majority.
> it's simple math. certainly you can see that 80% is a lot more than
> 20%.
>
He said "many", not "majority". I see reading comprehension is not your
strong suit.

Hello everyone!
I need iPhone 4G unlocking code for AT&T. Please anyone can help me
regarding this matter.
Awaiting for prompt response. Thanks and keep on sharing good posts as
well.




--
ariakerry

On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:14:12 +0100, in
<[email protected]>, ariakerry
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I need iPhone 4G unlocking code for AT&T. Please anyone can help me
>regarding this matter.

Only AT&T can help you. You should be able to get it by asking if your
account is in good standing.

--
John

"Assumption is the mother of all screw ups."
[Wethern’s Law of Suspended Judgement]

In article <[email protected]>, John Navas
<[email protected]> wrote:

> >I need iPhone 4G unlocking code for AT&T. Please anyone can help me
> >regarding this matter.
>
> Only AT&T can help you. You should be able to get it by asking if your
> account is in good standing.

completely wrong. at&t will not provide unlocking codes for iphones.