FYI: HTC ExtUSB connector and USB cables

John Navas <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> Must have? Replace a $100 DVD player with a $500 iToy?
> You must be oblivious to the current economic situation.
>
> --
> John
>
>

Money is no object when purchasing genuine Apple equipment. The price
charged means nothing when buying this level of Chinese slave-manufactured
quality and pseudo-multitasking technology.

--
http://www.energyradio.jo/ English hiphop station in Ammon, Jordan?!
Larry

---

› See More: FYI: HTC ExtUSB connector and USB cables

Justin <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]
september.org:

> How well can an ipad play DVDs?
>

Just as well as it can print an email to a bluetooth printer.

--
http://www.energyradio.jo/ English hiphop station in Ammon, Jordan?!
Larry

On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:26:10 -0700, Steve Sobol <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] says...
>
>>
>> My brother won an iPad as a door prize recently. He offered it to me,
>> but I declined, so he gave it to his kids, ages 6, 12, and 15. He says
>> they played with it a few times at first, but it's been on a shelf now
>> for a few months. I guess it's not popular at their house, nor would
>> it be popular at mine.
>
>If his family doesn't want it, I'll take it
>
>I'll even pay for shipping
>
>I'm just curious what the buzz is about. I will never sign up for at&t
>cell service, but I can use the iPad over Wifi, right?
>
>If your brother is interested in sending it to me, email me. The email
>address listed below is valid.

I told him to eBay it, but I think he's not even interested enough to
do that.

--
Paul Miner

Larry wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:56:54 +0000]:
> Justin <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]
> september.org:
>
>> How well can an ipad play DVDs?
>>
>
> Just as well as it can print an email to a bluetooth printer.

Or ANY printer...

Larry wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:11 +0000]:
> SMS <[email protected]> wrote in news:4c6a80aa$0$22135
> [email protected]:
>
>> This is a must-have entertainment
>> device for kids, replacing the mobile DVD player.
>
> By the way, for the kids, the entire Disney kid movie collection as far
> back as 1930, has been posted in DivX format with beautiful quality, to
> alt.binaries.movies.divx for downloading. You'll need WinRAR or clone to
> assemble it. Grabit from www.shemes.com is free as a client to download
> and decode it while you sleep.....

Way to advocate law breaking.

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Speculation that iPhone will be coming to Verizon.
>

> John
>
> "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups."
> [Wethern's Law of Suspended Judgement]

Posted without comment.

--
Owen McKenzie
Pigeon Forge, TN

The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can bribe
the people with their own money.
- Unsourced attribution to Alexander Fraser Tytler (often misattributed to
Alexis de Tocqueville)

Justin wrote:
> Larry wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:11 +0000]:
>> SMS <[email protected]> wrote in news:4c6a80aa$0$22135
>> [email protected]:
>>
>>> This is a must-have entertainment
>>> device for kids, replacing the mobile DVD player.
>> By the way, for the kids, the entire Disney kid movie collection as far
>> back as 1930, has been posted in DivX format with beautiful quality, to
>> alt.binaries.movies.divx for downloading. You'll need WinRAR or clone to
>> assemble it. Grabit from www.shemes.com is free as a client to download
>> and decode it while you sleep.....
>
> Way to advocate law breaking.
>

Did you notice that the date mentioned was 1930? For the last ??? years
copyright has been good for 50 years or the life of the author/creator,
whichever is greater!

In article <[email protected]>,
"Richard B. Gilbert" <[email protected]> wrote:

> >
>
> Did you notice that the date mentioned was 1930? For the last ??? years
> copyright has been good for 50 years or the life of the author/creator,
> whichever is greater!

Actually that changed quite a few years ago. It is now 95 years from
publication or 120 years from creation whichever is shorter (anonymous
works, pseudonymous works, or works made for hire, published since 1978)

95 years from publication for works published 1964*1977; 28 (if
copyright not renewed) or 95 years from publication for works published
1923*1963 (Copyrights prior to 1923 have expired.)
Life +70, since 1978 (can't remember which this was, but it is
conceivable that the copyright is still in force).

--
I want to find a voracious, small-minded predator
and name it after the IRS.
Robert Bakker, paleontologist

Richard B. Gilbert wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:47:16 -0400]:
> Justin wrote:
>> Larry wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:11 +0000]:
>>> SMS <[email protected]> wrote in news:4c6a80aa$0$22135
>>> [email protected]:
>>>
>>>> This is a must-have entertainment
>>>> device for kids, replacing the mobile DVD player.
>>> By the way, for the kids, the entire Disney kid movie collection as far
>>> back as 1930, has been posted in DivX format with beautiful quality, to
>>> alt.binaries.movies.divx for downloading. You'll need WinRAR or clone to
>>> assemble it. Grabit from www.shemes.com is free as a client to download
>>> and decode it while you sleep.....
>>
>> Way to advocate law breaking.
>>
>
> Did you notice that the date mentioned was 1930? For the last ??? years
> copyright has been good for 50 years or the life of the author/creator,
> whichever is greater!

No, it isn't.


It's life + 70 years.

In article <[email protected]>,
Justin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Richard B. Gilbert wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:47:16 -0400]:
> > Justin wrote:
> >> Larry wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:11 +0000]:
> >>> SMS <[email protected]> wrote in news:4c6a80aa$0$22135
> >>> [email protected]:
> >>>
> >>>> This is a must-have entertainment
> >>>> device for kids, replacing the mobile DVD player.
> >>> By the way, for the kids, the entire Disney kid movie collection as far
> >>> back as 1930, has been posted in DivX format with beautiful quality, to
> >>> alt.binaries.movies.divx for downloading. You'll need WinRAR or clone to
> >>> assemble it. Grabit from www.shemes.com is free as a client to download
> >>> and decode it while you sleep.....
> >>
> >> Way to advocate law breaking.
> >>
> >
> > Did you notice that the date mentioned was 1930? For the last ??? years
> > copyright has been good for 50 years or the life of the author/creator,
> > whichever is greater!
>
> No, it isn't.
>
>
> It's life + 70 years.

And we are talking Disney, so it was not a personal copyright and the
life of the author is beside the point.

--
I want to find a voracious, small-minded predator
and name it after the IRS.
Robert Bakker, paleontologist

Justin <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> Larry wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:11 +0000]:
>> SMS <[email protected]> wrote in news:4c6a80aa$0$22135
>> [email protected]:
>>
>>> This is a must-have entertainment
>>> device for kids, replacing the mobile DVD player.
>>
>> By the way, for the kids, the entire Disney kid movie collection as
>> far back as 1930, has been posted in DivX format with beautiful
>> quality, to alt.binaries.movies.divx for downloading. You'll need
>> WinRAR or clone to assemble it. Grabit from www.shemes.com is free
>> as a client to download and decode it while you sleep.....
>
> Way to advocate law breaking.
>
>

Makes my asshole burn just thinking about it....


--
http://www.energyradio.jo/ English hiphop station in Ammon, Jordan?!
Larry

Kurt Ullman <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Richard B. Gilbert" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >
>>
>> Did you notice that the date mentioned was 1930? For the last ???
>> years copyright has been good for 50 years or the life of the
>> author/creator, whichever is greater!
>
> Actually that changed quite a few years ago. It is now 95 years from
> publication or 120 years from creation whichever is shorter (anonymous
> works, pseudonymous works, or works made for hire, published since
> 1978)
>
> 95 years from publication for works published 1964*1977; 28 (if
> copyright not renewed) or 95 years from publication for works
> published 1923*1963 (Copyrights prior to 1923 have expired.)
> Life +70, since 1978 (can't remember which this was, but it is
> conceivable that the copyright is still in force).
>

Arrest everyone. Everyone is guilty if you read it all.....


--
http://www.energyradio.jo/ English hiphop station in Ammon, Jordan?!
Larry

Kurt Ullman wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Richard B. Gilbert wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:47:16 -0400]:
>>> Justin wrote:
>>>> Larry wrote on [Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:53:11 +0000]:
>>>>> SMS <[email protected]> wrote in news:4c6a80aa$0$22135
>>>>> [email protected]:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a must-have entertainment
>>>>>> device for kids, replacing the mobile DVD player.
>>>>> By the way, for the kids, the entire Disney kid movie collection as far
>>>>> back as 1930, has been posted in DivX format with beautiful quality, to
>>>>> alt.binaries.movies.divx for downloading. You'll need WinRAR or clone to
>>>>> assemble it. Grabit from www.shemes.com is free as a client to download
>>>>> and decode it while you sleep.....
>>>> Way to advocate law breaking.
>>>>
>>> Did you notice that the date mentioned was 1930? For the last ??? years
>>> copyright has been good for 50 years or the life of the author/creator,
>>> whichever is greater!
>> No, it isn't.
>>
>>
>> It's life + 70 years.
>
> And we are talking Disney, so it was not a personal copyright and the
> life of the author is beside the point.
>

Remember, Disney can afford more and better lawyers than you can!

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...


> >
>
> Arrest everyone. Everyone is guilty if you read it all.....

Considering how aggressive RIAA and MPAA are, what you are advocating is
guaranteed to get people sued. What astounds me is that you know this,
and suggest crap like this anyhow.

But why should you give a ****? Really? Why? It's not you getting in
trouble, is it?



--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
[email protected]

Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote in news:MPG.26d6295158736c4d9899f0
@news.justthe.net:

> Considering how aggressive RIAA and MPAA are, what you are advocating is
> guaranteed to get people sued. What astounds me is that you know this,
> and suggest crap like this anyhow.
>
> But why should you give a ****? Really? Why? It's not you getting in
> trouble, is it?
>

Your news is old, Steve! RIAA/MPAA quit prosecuting downloaders a year or
more ago. They only go after the posters, now, and never on usenet where
anonymity is tough to crack. They've ALWAYS gone after the easy targets,
traps set up to trap bit torrent idiots or the companies that do
connections.

There hasn't been a user prosecution in over a year, I think. I haven't
researched it, but you can play on Google is you like.

The religious guilt trip doesn't play here. I can get the movies free from
the local library and copy them from there, I suppose. They're all old
crap, like they sell on TV.

Someday "they" will put a stop to it. I have enough to keep me entertained
for decades.

I sent Glenn Miller an email asking him if he objected to my possessing his
music. I got no reply, so I guess it's ok.



--
http://www.energyradio.jo/ English hiphop station in Ammon, Jordan?!
Larry