Does Cingular offer one-year contract?

Went through their website and all I see is two-year contracts for
Nation GSM Plans. Don't want to be tied for two years, but then the
rest of the deal on phones and plans all look good to me. Do they
offer one-year contract?

---

› See More: Does Cingular offer one-year contract?

Yes, they do.

"Cyper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Went through their website and all I see is two-year contracts for
> Nation GSM Plans. Don't want to be tied for two years, but then the
> rest of the deal on phones and plans all look good to me. Do they
> offer one-year contract?

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:22:34 -0500, "Paw-Paw" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Yes, they do.
>
>"Cyper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Went through their website and all I see is two-year contracts for
>> Nation GSM Plans. Don't want to be tied for two years, but then the
>> rest of the deal on phones and plans all look good to me. Do they
>> offer one-year contract?
>

Sorry, I forgot to ask where to get that. any link? or just call them
up and ask for one year contract? Do they charge more on anything for
that?

"Cyper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> Sorry, I forgot to ask where to get that. any link? or just call them
> up and ask for one year contract? Do they charge more on anything for
> that?

The promotions are not usually as good, so you will probably pay more than
you would for the same service on a two year agreement.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> The promotions are not usually as good

Well that usually nails it right down.

"Cyper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:22:34 -0500, "Paw-Paw" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Yes, they do.
> >
> >"Cyper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> Went through their website and all I see is two-year contracts for
> >> Nation GSM Plans. Don't want to be tied for two years, but then the
> >> rest of the deal on phones and plans all look good to me. Do they
> >> offer one-year contract?
> >
>
> Sorry, I forgot to ask where to get that. any link? or just call them
> up and ask for one year contract? Do they charge more on anything for
> that?

the biggest difference is in the up-front cost.

This is at the Cingular store here, other locations may vary-

The Phone I got was $29.00. with a 2 year Contract, (i didn't get one of the
free phones) I could get a 1 year contract for $79.00 more.

(I hope I remember the numbers right)


Anyway, I went with the 2-year Contract, because the Contract is figured at
$240.00 Pro-rated 0ver 24 Months- ($10.00 a Month) the 1 Year Contract (and
this is the one the Independant dealers don't mention) is $240.00 Pro-Rated
over 12 Months ($20.00 a month).


IOW- It's gonna cost the same to buy out of the Contract if you need to, no
matter 1 year or 2 year-

the 1 year would really cost more, because you've paid for the Phone up
front.

Best Buy. Free T616 and S307, 1 year contract.

Nuff said.

I will personally only deal with a big name store instead of a corner Mom
and Pop store, but that's just me.

--
Team EuroMeko
---------------------------------------------
http://blackie.bounceme.net


"Randy I" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Cyper wrote:
> > Went through their website and all I see is two-year contracts for
> > Nation GSM Plans. Don't want to be tied for two years, but then the
> > rest of the deal on phones and plans all look good to me. Do they
> > offer one-year contract?
>
> Yes Cingular does offer one year contracts. Moreover you might get a
> better deal on the price of the phone if you go to an independently
> owned/operated (not a company store) Cingular dealer. Of course, just
> as with anything else, your mileage may vary.
>
> I live in the San Gabriel Valley area of Los Angeles County. Around
> here, there are even more cell phone stores than Starbucks. Since a lot
> of potential customers are of Asian descent, there are a lot of Asian
> owned/operated Cingular dealerships. Over the years I've consistently
> received better deals and customer service from independent dealers.
> I've never signed over a one year contract, but still received a better
> price on the phone, received more ancillary accessories (like the car
> chargers, cases, headsets, etc.) for no additional charge, and they will
> even go to bat for me with Cingular if there's a problem with my
> request, my bill or if I didn't receive a rebate on time.
>
> For example, recently I received a mailed offer directly from Cingular.
> (I've had my account with Cingular for about ten months and spend
> about $66 a month.) They were offering a Motorola V400 for $149.99
> after a $50 mail in rebate. The offer required a 2 year contract.
> Total cost = $166.49 after rebate (I'm assuming my local tax rate on
> $199.99). (199.99 + tax - rebate = $166.49)
>
> I went to my usual local dealer to see what they could get me. The
> independent dealer offered the V400 for $299 but they were able to get
> Cingular to give me a $100 rebate and with only a one year contract.
> Furthermore, the store credited me with a $123.67 incentive and they
> threw-in a Motorola OEM headset, an aftermarket case and an aftermarket
> car charger too. Total cost, an even $100.00 after rebate. ($299 + tax
> - incentive - mail-in rebate = $100)
>
> So bottom line I saved almost $67 bucks. There's probably other people
> who get better deals. On the other hand I'm sure there are people who
> have bad experiences with an independent dealer. The old saying "buyer
> beware" is always true. Point is, go do some research and get a better
> deal than the first offer you come across.
>
> -Randy.
>

Paw-Paw wrote:
> "Cyper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 15:22:34 -0500, "Paw-Paw" <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, they do.
>>>
>>>"Cyper" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>>Went through their website and all I see is two-year contracts for
>>>>Nation GSM Plans. Don't want to be tied for two years, but then the
>>>>rest of the deal on phones and plans all look good to me. Do they
>>>>offer one-year contract?
>>>
>>Sorry, I forgot to ask where to get that. any link? or just call them
>>up and ask for one year contract? Do they charge more on anything for
>>that?
>
> the biggest difference is in the up-front cost.
>
> This is at the Cingular store here, other locations may vary-
>
> The Phone I got was $29.00. with a 2 year Contract, (i didn't get one of the
> free phones) I could get a 1 year contract for $79.00 more.
>
> (I hope I remember the numbers right)
>
> Anyway, I went with the 2-year Contract, because the Contract is figured at
> $240.00 Pro-rated 0ver 24 Months- ($10.00 a Month) the 1 Year Contract (and
> this is the one the Independant dealers don't mention) is $240.00 Pro-Rated
> over 12 Months ($20.00 a month).
>
> IOW- It's gonna cost the same to buy out of the Contract if you need to, no
> matter 1 year or 2 year-
>
> the 1 year would really cost more, because you've paid for the Phone up
> front.

According to my calculations there are two points where the cost of 1
year vs 2 year contracts change relative to the other. If you expect
to terminate the contract in 4 months or less, the 2year contract plus
phone is cheaper. However the costs are even in month 5. Months 6-18
are less on the 1 year contract. Then you break even again in month
19. So If you expect to keep the same contract and phone for
4 months or less 2 year contract;
5 months , flip a coin
6-18 months 1 year contract
19 months, flip a coin
20-24 months 2 year contract

Cancel
After 1 Year
Month 1 Year Plus $50 2 Year
0 240 290 240
1 220 270 230
2 200 250 220
3 180 230 210
4 160 210 200
5 140 190 190
6 120 170 180
7 100 150 170
8 80 130 160
9 60 110 150
10 40 90 140
11 20 70 130
12 0 50 120
13 0 50 110
14 0 50 100
15 0 50 90
16 0 50 80
17 0 50 70
18 0 50 60
19 0 50 50
20 0 50 40
21 0 50 30
22 0 50 20
23 0 50 10
24 0 50 0

--
BrZ

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > The promotions are not usually as good
>
> Well that usually nails it right down.

I used the word purposely, you moron. There are instances where you can get
the same deal with a one year agreement. However, in most cases, that is
not the situation. So, the promotions are not USUALLY as good with a one
year contract.

Unlike you, I don't make stuff up.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The promotions are not usually as good
> >
> > Well that usually nails it right down.
>
> I used the word purposely, you moron. There are instances where you can get
> the same deal with a one year agreement. However, in most cases, that is
> not the situation. So, the promotions are not USUALLY as good with a one
> year contract.
>
> Unlike you, I don't make stuff up.

Just gratuitous childish insults.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> Just gratuitous childish insults.

The insults are well earned on your part. Between your propensities to lie,
misquote and use different names in the same thread to bolster your weak
arguments, many have become tired of your childish antics, and none have
come to your aid. Wonder why?

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >
> > Just gratuitous childish insults.
>
> The insults are well earned on your part.

No foul langiuage insult is ever deserved in a public setting.

Keep on demonstrating your immaturity to curse at anyone who disagrees
with you.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> No foul langiuage insult is ever deserved in a public setting.
>
> Keep on demonstrating your immaturity to curse at anyone who disagrees
> with you.

What about the rest of the post- I asked for some links- are you saying that
the company you work for has secrets? They must be hiding these things
because they are in trouble and getting ready to go under- after all, that
is what you say everytime you aren't sent a personal press release about the
workings of major corporations.

Where are the links?

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >
> > No foul langiuage insult is ever deserved in a public setting.
> >
> > Keep on demonstrating your immaturity to curse at anyone who disagrees
> > with you.
>
> What about the rest of the post- I asked for some links- are you saying that
> the company you work for has secrets? They must be hiding these things
> because they are in trouble and getting ready to go under- after all, that
> is what you say everytime you aren't sent a personal press release about the
> workings of major corporations.
>
> Where are the links?


There are no links cause Cingular is being secretive about cutting back
on Network ependitures, and it was discovered by a Wall Street Analyst.

You are the one who goes ballastic everytime there is a news story at
variance with corporate propaganda which you always blindly accept.

And after what you and your buddies did to Justin, where I work will
remain unknown to you.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,

>
>
> There are no links cause Cingular is being secretive about cutting back
> on Network ependitures, and it was discovered by a Wall Street Analyst.

How do you think the analyst got a hold of the numbers? Could they have
been from.....oh, I don't know.....Cingular? And if you say no, then
provide facts to back up your claim.

>
> You are the one who goes ballastic everytime there is a news story at
> variance with corporate propaganda which you always blindly accept.

I didn't go ballistic about this- you did, posting it in multiple
newsgroups. I (among others) simply pointed out that you don't know what
you are talking about.

>
> And after what you and your buddies did to Justin, where I work will
> remain unknown to you.

Better check your archives- I didn't do anything to Justin. But thanks for
confirming that your company is getting ready to go under. That's what the
lack of public information means, according to you.