Results 1 to 15 of 17
- 03-31-2004, 08:24 PM #1shawnbGuest
Keep up the good work Robert M! You've almost toppled the "evil empire"!
What are you going to do once the merger happens? Can we expect to see you
in the Cingular group talking the same old garbage?
› See More: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
- 03-31-2004, 09:03 PM #2Robert M.Guest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
In article <[email protected]>,
"shawnb" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Keep up the good work Robert M! You've almost toppled the "evil empire"!
>
> What are you going to do once the merger happens? Can we expect to see you
> in the Cingular group talking the same old garbage?
If I didn't have a nondisclosure agreement, I could really tell you what
I did.
- 03-31-2004, 09:05 PM #3Scott StephensonGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> If I didn't have a nondisclosure agreement, I could really tell you what
> I did.
And if you had a functional brain, you'd realize how full of crap you are.
- 08-03-2004, 09:45 AM #4John NavasGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 01 Apr
2004 03:03:19 GMT, "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote:
>If I didn't have a nondisclosure agreement, ...
I'm willing to bet $50 that you don't. So put up or ... ;-)
"If I told you what I knew I'd have to kill you!"
-Robert M.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
- 08-03-2004, 10:30 AM #5RobertGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Thu, 01 Apr
> 2004 03:03:19 GMT, "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >If I didn't have a nondisclosure agreement, ...
>
> I'm willing to bet $50 that you don't. So put up or ... ;-)
>
> "If I told you what I knew I'd have to kill you!"
> -Robert M.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
You know full well that a nondisclosure agreement means I can't.
- 08-03-2004, 11:30 AM #6John NavasGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
16:30:42 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Thu, 01 Apr
>> 2004 03:03:19 GMT, "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >If I didn't have a nondisclosure agreement, ...
>>
>> I'm willing to bet $50 that you don't. So put up or ... ;-)
>>
>> "If I told you what I knew I'd have to kill you!"
>> -Robert M.
>You know full well that a nondisclosure agreement means I can't.
What a joke.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-03-2004, 12:12 PM #7RobertGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
> 16:30:42 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
> >>
> >> In <[email protected]> on Thu, 01 Apr
> >> 2004 03:03:19 GMT, "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >If I didn't have a nondisclosure agreement, ...
> >>
> >> I'm willing to bet $50 that you don't. So put up or ... ;-)
> >>
> >> "If I told you what I knew I'd have to kill you!"
> >> -Robert M.
>
> >You know full well that a nondisclosure agreement means I can't.
>
> What a joke.
Fine show your ignorance of what a nondisclosure agreement is.
It's a contract.
- 08-03-2004, 12:16 PM #8John NavasGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
18:12:30 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
>> 16:30:42 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In <[email protected]> on Thu, 01 Apr
>> >> 2004 03:03:19 GMT, "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >If I didn't have a nondisclosure agreement, ...
>> >>
>> >> I'm willing to bet $50 that you don't. So put up or ... ;-)
>> >>
>> >> "If I told you what I knew I'd have to kill you!"
>> >> -Robert M.
>>
>> >You know full well that a nondisclosure agreement means I can't.
>>
>> What a joke.
>
>Fine show your ignorance of what a nondisclosure agreement is.
>It's a contract.
The joke is your claim that you're under NDA.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-03-2004, 02:11 PM #9RobertGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug
> 2004
> 18:12:30 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug
> >> 2004
> >> 16:30:42 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <[email protected]>,
> >> > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In <[email protected]> on Thu, 01
> >> >> Apr
> >> >> 2004 03:03:19 GMT, "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >If I didn't have a nondisclosure agreement, ...
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm willing to bet $50 that you don't. So put up or ... ;-)
> >> >>
> >> >> "If I told you what I knew I'd have to kill you!"
> >> >> -Robert M.
> >>
> >> >You know full well that a nondisclosure agreement means I can't.
> >>
> >> What a joke.
> >
> >Fine show your ignorance of what a nondisclosure agreement is.
> >It's a contract.
>
> The joke is your claim that you're under NDA.
Poor John = anything he doesn't want to accept is a joke.
Meanwhile why didnt you do anything about the Conmputer virus/worm
posted today, or isnt that against your precious Charter?
- 08-03-2004, 03:02 PM #10John NavasGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
20:11:02 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The joke is your claim that you're under NDA.
>
>Poor John = anything he doesn't want to accept is a joke.
A joke is a joke, and the NDA excuse is your funniest claim yet.
Since you're Under NDA, I guess that means you'll have to stop
posting here -- right?
BTW, Robert, I'm actually under NDA, in fact several of them.
But that doesn't stop me from posting here.
>Meanwhile why didnt you do anything about the Conmputer virus/worm
>posted today, or isnt that against your precious Charter?
1. None of your business.
2. Off-topic.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-03-2004, 03:42 PM #11Elmo P. ShagnastyGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW, Robert, I'm actually under NDA, in fact several of them.
Ah, another Usenet blowhard.
Tell us again, John, how important you are. (I'm sure you will; you
can't stop yourself. You'll spout it out, even if you have to make it
up like you do so well.)
- 08-03-2004, 04:15 PM #12RobertGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> A joke is a joke, and the NDA excuse is your funniest claim yet.
> Since you're Under NDA, I guess that means you'll have to stop
> posting here -- right?
Sorry, when you post lies (like the BBB can help people and a letter to
a State Attorney General can't) I WILL POST HERE.
>
> BTW, Robert, I'm actually under NDA, in fact several of them.
> But that doesn't stop me from posting here.
Duh, if you read the posts (you seem to have a poor memory) the NDA is
with AT&T Wireless.
>
> >Meanwhile why didnt you do anything about the Conmputer virus/worm
> >posted today, or isnt that against your precious Charter?
>
> 1. None of your business.
>
> 2. Off-topic.
This group is going down the toilet from posts from SCAMers, SPAMers,
and Worm/Virus posters, yet you in your self-important anal-retentive
way worry about some poor guy that for ONE time in his life posts a link
to a phone on Ebay?
It's VERY ON TOPIC - YOUR SELF GRANDIZING BEHAVIOR thats counter
productive to the smooth operation of this newsgroup.
- 08-03-2004, 04:16 PM #13RobertGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
In article <[email protected]>,
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > BTW, Robert, I'm actually under NDA, in fact several of them.
>
> Ah, another Usenet blowhard.
>
> Tell us again, John, how important you are. (I'm sure you will; you
> can't stop yourself. You'll spout it out, even if you have to make it
> up like you do so well.)
It's a joke, Elmo. John has already said that anyone claiming to be
under NDA is joking.
- 08-03-2004, 09:25 PM #14John NavasGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
22:15:35 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> A joke is a joke, and the NDA excuse is your funniest claim yet.
>> Since you're Under NDA, I guess that means you'll have to stop
>> posting here -- right?
>
>Sorry, when you post lies
I don't.
>(like the BBB can help people and a letter to
>a State Attorney General can't)
True.
>I WILL POST HERE.
That depends on how much you continue to abuse the charter.
>> BTW, Robert, I'm actually under NDA, in fact several of them.
>> But that doesn't stop me from posting here.
>
>Duh, if you read the posts (you seem to have a poor memory) the NDA is
>with AT&T Wireless.
Uh huh. [snicker]
>> >Meanwhile why didnt you do anything about the Conmputer virus/worm
>> >posted today, or isnt that against your precious Charter?
>>
>> 1. None of your business.
>>
>> 2. Off-topic.
>
>This group is going down the toilet from posts from SCAMers, SPAMers,
>and Worm/Virus posters,
It's actually under more serious attack from bad information.
>yet you in your self-important anal-retentive
>way worry about some poor guy that for ONE time in his life posts a link
>to a phone on Ebay?
>
>It's VERY ON TOPIC - YOUR SELF GRANDIZING BEHAVIOR thats counter
>productive to the smooth operation of this newsgroup.
The Charter says otherwise. Either respect it, or find someplace else to
rant.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-04-2004, 12:49 AM #15John NavasGuest
Re: Robert M catches ATT Wireless lying!
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
22:16:29 GMT, Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > BTW, Robert, I'm actually under NDA, in fact several of them.
>>
>> Ah, another Usenet blowhard.
>>
>> Tell us again, John, how important you are. (I'm sure you will; you
>> can't stop yourself. You'll spout it out, even if you have to make it
>> up like you do so well.)
>
>It's a joke, Elmo. John has already said that anyone claiming to be
>under NDA is joking.
No, Robert, just you.
--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.nextel
- alt.cellular.nextel
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones
Real estate investment in the UAE
in Chit Chat