Cingular BBB record

In article <[email protected]>,
"Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] (Todd Allcock) wrote:
> >
> > > My point was that very few did. 1400 complaints over 36 months for a
> > > company with how many customers? 15 million? Not bad.
> >
> > Ahem There are not 15 miilion Cingular customers in Atlanta, thank you.
>
> The complaints aren't all from Atlanta, troll boy, the BBB lists companies
> by their corporate HQ, which, in this case happens to be in Atlanta, thank
> YOU.
>
> > And only a small percentage of complaints are soooo bad they get sent to
> > the BBB.
>
> Bull- anybody can complain to the BBB about virtually anything.

But they don't.

In a Rare case, the BBB said bad things about Cingular. And some are
breaking their arm patting Cingular on the back for not being so bad.

I would say that in most cases companies are far worse than any negative
thing the BBB says.

All Cellular carries make the money off overage charges, just like
Blockbuster is only profitable from LATE fees.

And even Farquartz agreed with:

> I am saying that the BBB is hardly totally impartial, and the HIGH
> relative number of complaints it received about Cingular in Atlanta,
> needs to be considered, regardless of whether the BBB later (fairly or
> unfairly) marks it resolved.
>
> "Resolution" can not be taken at face value where the BBB is considered.

---

› See More: Cingular BBB record

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:rmarkoff-
> In most cases yes, and thats the truth. Cingular pays BBB, customers
> don't.

Well, your opinion directly contradicts my experience,
so I guess I'm done here.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:rmarkoff-

> And even Farquartz agreed with:
>
> > I am saying that the BBB is hardly totally impartial, and the HIGH
> > relative number of complaints it received about Cingular in Atlanta,
> > needs to be considered, regardless of whether the BBB later (fairly or
> > unfairly) marks it resolved.
> >
> > "Resolution" can not be taken at face value where the BBB is considered.

Just because I don't take issue with each and every line you write
hardly means I agree with you. Are you saying all lines you snipped
and don't respond to are sentiments you agree with? I would venture
a no.

Plus, it is clearly Farquart

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> But they don't.
>
> In a Rare case, the BBB said bad things about Cingular. And some are
> breaking their arm patting Cingular on the back for not being so bad.

So youy have now contradicted yourself- if the BBB always sides with the
business, they would have no bad marks.

>
> I would say that in most cases companies are far worse than any negative
> thing the BBB says.

We don't care what you say or think- back it up with facts.

>
> All Cellular carries make the money off overage charges, just like
> Blockbuster is only profitable from LATE fees.

Which has nothing to do with this thread- stay on topic

>
> And even Farquartz agreed with:
>
> > I am saying that the BBB is hardly totally impartial, and the HIGH
> > relative number of complaints it received about Cingular in Atlanta,
> > needs to be considered, regardless of whether the BBB later (fairly or
> > unfairly) marks it resolved.
> >
> > "Resolution" can not be taken at face value where the BBB is considered.

No- those were your words, not his/

"Resolution" can not be taken at face value where the BBB is considered.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Bernard Farquart" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:rmarkoff-
> > In most cases yes, and thats the truth. Cingular pays BBB, customers
> > don't.
>
> Well, your opinion directly contradicts my experience,
> so I guess I'm done here.

Anecdotal evidence is never valid.

"Resolution" can not be taken at face value where the BBB is considered.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Bernard Farquart" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:rmarkoff-
> > > In most cases yes, and thats the truth. Cingular pays BBB, customers
> > > don't.
> >
> > Well, your opinion directly contradicts my experience,
> > so I guess I'm done here.
>
> Anecdotal evidence is never valid.

But that is less than you have provided- does that make you less valid?

As a matter of fact, everything posted here and in the other cellular groups
by you is just a collection of anecdotal evidence- yet you are unable to
cope with someone questioning the validity of those posts. Double standard,
Phil?

>
> "Resolution" can not be taken at face value where the BBB is considered.

No evidence to support your claim.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Resolution" can not be taken at face value where the BBB is considered.

You have provided no proof, further hindering your credibility.