Number portability for the rest of the US

Monday, March 24....

http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938


--
John Bartley K7AAY http://celdata.cjb.net
This post quad-ROT-13 encrypted; reading it violates the DMCA.
"We're not living in a simulation. We're living in a collaborative SF novel... and now, of course, it's Philip K. Dick's turn. In a back room somewhere, Vernor Vinge and George Orwell are currently arguing about who gets to take over in 2025." (Ross Smit
h)

---

› See More: Number portability for the rest of the US

In alt.cellular [email protected] wrote:
> Monday, March 24....

ITYM May 24

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
Domain Names, $9.95/yr, 24x7 service: http://DomainNames.JustThe.net/
"someone once called me a sofa, but i didn't feel compelled to rush out and buy
slip covers." -adam brower * Hiroshima '45, Chernobyl '86, Windows 98/2000/2003

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:

> Monday, March 24....
>
> http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938

Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in
November.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in=20
> November.
>=20

Something you still haven't proven, Phill, nor have you even=20
attempted to do so.

And no, quarter-over-quarter numbers are *not* considered relevant by=20
real expert in the industry.

The ones looking at this objectively (most everyone *but* you) know=20
it's too early to come to a conclusion.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

"Røbert M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Monday, March 24....
> >
> > http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938
>
> Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in
> November.

So Phillipe, you've spouted this a few times ... Where's the proof
previously asked for, by yours truly and others ...?

By the by, should we reiterate your history on the SPCS newsgroup?

Bob

In article <%[email protected]>,
"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Røbert M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > Monday, March 24....
> > >
> > > http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938
> >
> > Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in
> > November.
>
> So you've spouted this a few times ... Where's the proof
> previously asked for, by yours truly and others ..

It's in the 10-K filings Sprint made with the SEC.

1,400,000 Customers lost last quarter. An increas ein CHURN rate from
2.7 to 2.9% per month !!


P.S.. Rural WLNP starts May 24.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In alt.cellular.attws Phillip <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's in the 10-K filings Sprint made with the SEC.
>
> 1,400,000 Customers lost last quarter. An increas ein CHURN rate from
> 2.7 to 2.9% per month !!
>
>
> P.S.. Rural WLNP starts May 24.

As we all know, that says NOTHING at all about WLNP. That only speaks of
churn and it only speaks of churn in a single monthly transition period
where it is far more typical to compare quarters to the same quarter one
year prior.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFArLK+1p0e3NXsrtERAi9LAJ4soiN3nbnRUXXbbSyLZ5PCUtidGACfZ55S
8Y+S/yG6hOkO1dij4pnjGCc=
=a9+M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In article <[email protected]>,
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote:


>
> In alt.cellular.attws Phillip <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's in the 10-K filings Sprint made with the SEC.
> >
> > 1,400,000 Customers lost last quarter. An increas ein CHURN rate from
> > 2.7 to 2.9% per month !!
> >
> >
> > P.S.. Rural WLNP starts May 24.
>
> As we all know, that says NOTHING at all about WLNP. That only speaks of
> churn and it only speaks of churn in a single monthly transition period
> where it is far more typical to compare quarters to the same quarter one
> year prior.

We know SprintPCS is perfect for this apologist.

Try reading the 10-Q filed with the SEC.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In alt.cellular.attws Phillip <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We know SprintPCS is perfect for this apologist.
>
> Try reading the 10-Q filed with the SEC.

I invite you to post the relavent data in proper context. You have
failed to do so in other threads in the sprint forum, I see no reason
to believe that you will do so here.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFArMSN1p0e3NXsrtERAoNVAKCIRhmi99obgubvW6yg8cfNNl/KmwCgwhJX
7WdLfwVafCDk5grTgh4CMmo=
=zigr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In article <[email protected]>,
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In alt.cellular.attws a forged address
> >
> > We know SprintPCS is perfect for this apologist.
> >
> > Try reading the 10-Q filed with the SEC.

> > SprintPCS was a loser in WLNP in Q1 2004.


>
Taking to forging addresses are we now? That is surely against the TOS
of your ISP.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In alt.cellular.attws Phillip <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
> Taking to forging addresses are we now? That is surely against the TOS
> of your ISP.

Why, is [email protected] your real address? I don't think so. I
simply reply to your first known alias. If you care to put your real
name and address out here, I would gladly reply to that one Phillip.

BTW, if you are so inclined, feel free to send a complaint to abuse @
octanews.com, as that is the proper email for complaints. Just keep in
mind that you will have to give them a valid email address so that they
can reply to you.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFArNsv1p0e3NXsrtERAu1rAKCa6U7GBhznk0lnjFMUOp0wzvPATwCgpITJ
9zRLViOAxJ5ZBpRku9/jywg=
=WdBr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Wed, 19 May 2004 18:23:42 -0500, Steven J Sobol <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In alt.cellular [email protected] wrote:
>> Monday, March 24....
>
>ITYM May 24

Brain Damage.
--
John Bartley K7AAY http://celdata.cjb.net
This post quad-ROT-13 encrypted; reading it violates the DMCA.
Nobody but a fool goes into a federal counterrorism operation without duct tape - Richard Preston, THE COBRA EVENT.