Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17
  1. #16
    Scott Stephenson

    Re: Friend not getting acceptable coverage

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]

    > A letter to one's State's Attorney general will make them say something
    > more consumer friendly.

    How do you figure? The AG will send them a form letter, and Cingular will
    respond with their justification for the charge. End of story. You flaunt
    the AG like the second coming, when they do nothing except send a letter.
    Do you have any substantiated information to prove otherwise?

    See More: Friend not getting acceptable coverage

  2. #17

    Re: Friend not getting acceptable coverage

    Leonard wrote:

    > On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:30:43 GMT, "Robert M." <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >>In article <[email protected]>,
    >>The Ghost of General Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>I have a friend who is moving and is having trouble with her Samsung
    >>>X427. Cingular has told her the area she's moving to has "very weak"
    >>>GSM coverage.

    >>Sounds like a perfectly valid reason to be let out of one's contract
    >>with no ETF.

    > Agreed. Particulary if said phone was bought mostly for 911 emergency
    > calls as alot of elderly folks are doing these days.
    > No signal, no EMS911
    > No ETF <bg>

    I hope their phone does more than analogue, because Cingular is only
    maintaining enough analogue channels to barely meet FCC service
    regulations now. I expect Cingular is quietly twiddling their corporate
    thumbs until the magic sunset date.

    jer email reply - I am not a 'ten'
    "All that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of
    what we know." -- Richard Wilbur

  • Similar Threads

  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12