POP3 and SMTP servers?

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why am I not surprised.

That's enough. Welcome to my killfile.

Bruce.

---

› See More: POP3 and SMTP servers?

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Sun, 25 Jul 2004
23:45:50 GMT, "Bruce Chastain" <[email protected]> wrote:

>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...

>> Why am I not surprised.
>
>That's enough. Welcome to my killfile.

How childish. Again, why am I not surprised.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:2%[email protected]...
| [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
|
| In <[email protected]> on Sun, 25 Jul
2004
| 23:45:50 GMT, "Bruce Chastain" <[email protected]> wrote:
|
| >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| >news:[email protected]...
|
| >> Why am I not surprised.
| >
| >That's enough. Welcome to my killfile.
|
| How childish. Again, why am I not surprised.
|

For whatever reason, Bruce already decided it wouldn't work. That's why I
quit replying. It is very simple to do, but he was here to rant about his
shortcomings instead of look for help. He then got mad when he found out he
was dead wrong.

"Jason Cothran" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> For whatever reason, Bruce already decided it wouldn't work. That's why I
> quit replying. It is very simple to do, but he was here to rant about his
> shortcomings instead of look for help. He then got mad when he found out
he
> was dead wrong.

Jason, my apologies if you posted something here that would make my v400
work. I remember no such posting, and I believe I've tried everything
everyone suggested without success. Email messages to me still come in with
a reply address of 36-245 (regardless of source) and replies to those
messages go nowhere. Nothing has changed.

As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
that he is here for the combat, not to help people..

Bruce.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 26 Jul 2004
14:18:32 GMT, "Bruce Chastain" <[email protected]> wrote:

>"Jason Cothran" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> For whatever reason, Bruce already decided it wouldn't work. That's why I
>> quit replying. It is very simple to do, but he was here to rant about his
>> shortcomings instead of look for help. He then got mad when he found out he
>> was dead wrong.
>
>Jason, my apologies if you posted something here that would make my v400
>work.

And for your attitude?

>I remember no such posting,

There were a number of such postings by a number of people here.

>and I believe I've tried everything
>everyone suggested without success.

It's pretty clear that you don't really want to be helped -- you mostly want
to vent and argue. The information provided is fairly simple to use and
*does* work.

>Email messages to me still come in with
>a reply address of 36-245 (regardless of source) and replies to those
>messages go nowhere. Nothing has changed.

Indeed, including your attitude. As has been explained to you:
1. That's the address of the incoming Gateway.
2. The sender's email address is in the body of the message.
3. You have to send your reply to the outgoing Gateway.
4. The reply email address must be in the body of your message.
How (3) and (4) are accomplished depends on the particular phone, but can
always be done manually. If you'd had less attitude and a more open mind,
you'd know that.

>As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
>the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
>would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
>that he is here for the combat, not to help people..

Ad hominem. Why am I not surprised. At least you're consistent.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <[email protected]>,
"Bruce Chastain" <[email protected]> wrote:

> As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
> the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
> would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
> that he is here for the combat, not to help people..

I disagree, he seems as much interested in trying to pat himself on the
back.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 26 Jul
2004 15:56:25 GMT, "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> "Bruce Chastain" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
>> the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
>> would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
>> that he is here for the combat, not to help people..
>
>I disagree, he seems as much interested in trying to pat himself on the
>back.

Pot ... kettle ... ;-)

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

Røbert M., while diddling his dog..answered:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Bruce Chastain" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
>>the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
>>would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
>>that he is here for the combat, not to help people..
>
>
> I disagree, he seems as much interested in trying to pat himself on the
> back.


at least he doesn't get his jollies fellating his dog like you do.


Frau Himmel
Still trying to outrun the death grip clutches of The Strangler

In article <[email protected]>,
Frau Himmel <[email protected]> while goose-stepping wrote:

> obscene childish insults...


But tis to be expected from the children of Germany.


PLONK

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 26 Jul
2004 22:23:03 GMT, "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> Frau Himmel <[email protected]> while goose-stepping wrote:
>
>> obscene childish insults...
>
>
>But tis to be expected from the children of Germany.
>
>
>PLONK

OK, Røbert and Frau Himmel, enough already. This exchange clearly violates
the charter of this newsgroup (which I wrote). If it continues, complaints
will be filed with your news providers. Either grow up, or go someplace else.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK, Røbert and Frau Himmel, enough already. This exchange clearly violates
> the charter of this newsgroup (which I wrote). If it continues, complaints
> will be filed with your news providers. Either grow up, or go someplace else.

Poor Navas, thinks he runs USENET.

This group is unmoderated.

Go complain to a German ISP and see what it gets you.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 27 Jul
2004 02:11:14 GMT, "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> OK, Røbert and Frau Himmel, enough already. This exchange clearly violates
>> the charter of this newsgroup (which I wrote). If it continues, complaints
>> will be filed with your news providers. Either grow up, or go someplace else.
>
>Poor Navas, thinks he runs USENET.
>
>This group is unmoderated.
>
>Go complain to a German ISP and see what it gets you.

Irrelevant -- we can filter your posts to major news servers.
So keep right on being a jerk, and see where it gets you. ;-)

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 27 Jul
> 2004 02:11:14 GMT, "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, Røbert and Frau Himmel, enough already. This exchange clearly
> >> violates
> >> the charter of this newsgroup (which I wrote). If it continues,
> >> complaints
> >> will be filed with your news providers. Either grow up, or go someplace
> >> else.
> >
> >Poor Navas, thinks he runs USENET.
> >
> >This group is unmoderated.
> >
> >Go complain to a German ISP and see what it gets you.
>
> Irrelevant -- we can filter your posts to major news servers.
> So keep right on being a jerk, and see where it gets you. ;-)

You sure have delusions of grandeur. I am not the one using bad language
and calling people names.