Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 63 of 63
  1. #61
    Frank Harris
    Guest

    Re: Sprint, Cingular, Verizon admit to worthless coverage maps.

    If you haven't seen them, Verizon has better-than-average maps at
    http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/C...ype=NEWREQUEST
    or from the home page | Support | Coverage Locator.

    dr.wireMORE wrote:

    > The real jest: The maps are a disappointment, but not worthless. And
    > Verizon already complies! The dr.
    >
    > b) And the maps are a disappointment, and real coverage maps will be
    > welcomed by all


    --
    Frank Harris in San Francisco



    See More: Sprint, Cingular, Verizon admit to worthless coverage maps.




  2. #62
    IMHO
    Guest

    Re: Sprint, Cingular, Verizon admit to worthless coverage maps.

    Could have used better colors.

    "Frank Harris" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > If you haven't seen them, Verizon has better-than-average maps at
    >

    http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/C...ype=NEWREQUEST
    > or from the home page | Support | Coverage Locator.
    >
    > dr.wireMORE wrote:
    >
    > > The real jest: The maps are a disappointment, but not worthless. And
    > > Verizon already complies! The dr.
    > >
    > > b) And the maps are a disappointment, and real coverage maps will be
    > > welcomed by all

    >
    > --
    > Frank Harris in San Francisco






  3. #63
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Sprint, Cingular, Verizon admit to worthless coverage maps.

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    I disagree, on all counts.

    In <ZmhMc.11552$%[email protected]> on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:41:52
    -0400, "Chris Cowles" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >You're picking at nits.
    >
    >As a disinterested reader, I'd say the important point is that Sprint, et
    >al, agreed to change their behavior. If it really wasn't egregious, they
    >probably would have chosen to defend it.
    >
    >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
    >>
    >> Of course, but the issue here is the false allegation in the Subject.
    >>
    >> In <[email protected]> on Wed, 21 Jul 2004

    >19:51:51
    >> -0400, "Chris Cowles" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Not in support of anyone's opinion here, but most out-of-court

    >settlements
    >> >include a denial of liability. The fact one exists has little bearing on
    >> >whether or not they do, in fact, use deceptive trade practices.

    >


    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345