Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Sam Williams
    Guest
    I am planning to buy either v400 OR v220 with cingular wireless. Which
    one is better? These are the things i like to have..
    -External caller ID (picture caller id would be nice)
    -strong signal strength
    -camera with zoom
    -longer talk time

    If you have used either one of them, please post your views.

    Thank you

    Sam



    See More: Motorolla V400 or V220 ??




  2. #2
    RickRamey
    Guest

    Re: Motorolla V400 or V220 ??

    On 22 Oct 2004 09:45:49 -0700, [email protected] (Sam Williams)
    wrote:

    >I am planning to buy either v400 OR v220 with cingular wireless. Which
    >one is better? These are the things i like to have..
    >-External caller ID (picture caller id would be nice)
    >-strong signal strength
    >-camera with zoom
    >-longer talk time
    >
    >If you have used either one of them, please post your views.
    >
    >Thank you
    >
    >Sam


    I looked at both and went with the V400. The V220 was a bit too tiny
    for my hands, and for my wife's as well. Just didn't feel right.

    I have very good signal strength where I work using the V400 and
    Cingular. Previously I had used AT&T with a SE T616 with okay-to-poor
    reception and a V300 with T-Mobile with virtually no signal indoors at
    work. Looking at the phone right now, I have four bars. With T-Mobile
    I would have either zero or one, if I was lucky. With AT&T I had two
    usually.

    Camera with zoom is better than my old SET616, talk time is perfectly
    fine for me. I usually charge a couple times a week. External caller
    ID is good, but no picture.



  3. #3
    starwars
    Guest

    Re: Motorolla V400 or V220 ??

    On 22 Oct 2004 09:45:49 -0700, [email protected] (Sam Williams) wrote:

    >I am planning to buy either v400 OR v220 with cingular wireless. Which
    >one is better?


    This is a no-brainer. The v400 is MUCH MUCH better than the v220.




  4. #4
    John F
    Guest

    Re: Motorolla V400 or V220 ??

    "RickRamey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    > On 22 Oct 2004 09:45:49 -0700, [email protected] (Sam Williams)
    > wrote:
    >
    > >I am planning to buy either v400 OR v220 with cingular wireless. Which
    > >one is better? These are the things i like to have..
    > >-External caller ID (picture caller id would be nice)
    > >-strong signal strength
    > >-camera with zoom
    > >-longer talk time
    > >
    > >If you have used either one of them, please post your views.
    > >
    > >Thank you
    > >
    > >Sam

    >
    > I looked at both and went with the V400. The V220 was a bit too tiny
    > for my hands, and for my wife's as well. Just didn't feel right.
    >
    > I have very good signal strength where I work using the V400 and
    > Cingular. Previously I had used AT&T with a SE T616 with okay-to-poor
    > reception and a V300 with T-Mobile with virtually no signal indoors at
    > work. Looking at the phone right now, I have four bars. With T-Mobile
    > I would have either zero or one, if I was lucky. With AT&T I had two
    > usually.
    >
    > Camera with zoom is better than my old SET616, talk time is perfectly
    > fine for me. I usually charge a couple times a week. External caller
    > ID is good, but no picture.

    The V400 has picture ID but you have to open the phone to see it.





  5. #5
    Rick Ramey
    Guest

    Re: Motorolla V400 or V220 ??

    On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 04:53:20 -0400, "John F" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >"RickRamey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news[email protected]...
    >> On 22 Oct 2004 09:45:49 -0700, [email protected] (Sam Williams)
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >> >I am planning to buy either v400 OR v220 with cingular wireless. Which
    >> >one is better? These are the things i like to have..
    >> >-External caller ID (picture caller id would be nice)
    >> >-strong signal strength
    >> >-camera with zoom
    >> >-longer talk time
    >> >
    >> >If you have used either one of them, please post your views.
    >> >
    >> >Thank you
    >> >
    >> >Sam

    >>
    >> I looked at both and went with the V400. The V220 was a bit too tiny
    >> for my hands, and for my wife's as well. Just didn't feel right.
    >>
    >> I have very good signal strength where I work using the V400 and
    >> Cingular. Previously I had used AT&T with a SE T616 with okay-to-poor
    >> reception and a V300 with T-Mobile with virtually no signal indoors at
    >> work. Looking at the phone right now, I have four bars. With T-Mobile
    >> I would have either zero or one, if I was lucky. With AT&T I had two
    >> usually.
    >>
    >> Camera with zoom is better than my old SET616, talk time is perfectly
    >> fine for me. I usually charge a couple times a week. External caller
    >> ID is good, but no picture.

    >The V400 has picture ID but you have to open the phone to see it.
    >


    TOP had asked about external picture ID.



  6. #6
    Sam Williams
    Guest

    Re: Motorolla V400 or V220 ??

    Thanks a lot everyone for your quick responces... I really appreciate
    your help.. This would certainly help me decide which one to buy..

    Thanks again,

    Sam



  7. #7
    mikeblas
    mikeblas is offline
    Newbie

    Posts
    1

    I bought a V400 for myself, and my wife chose a V220. She took hers back the next day and exchanged it for a V400 like mine. Side-by-side, the V400 wins for display size and clarity.

    It's only slightly bigger, and my wife wanted a smaller phone. She's much happier with the better display.

    .B ekiM



  • Phones Discussed Above

    Motorola v400 More Motorola v400 topics Motorola Forum Reviews
    Motorola v220 More Motorola v220 topics Motorola Forum Reviews
  • Similar Threads