Star Trek Communicator sounds - These sounds?? (0/1)

Are these the sounds you are looking for?

---

› See More: Star Trek Communicator sounds - These sounds?? (0/1)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:54:58
-0500, TheDoctor <[email protected]> wrote:

>Are these the sounds you are looking for?

Please do NOT post binaries to this group.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> >Are these the sounds you are looking for?
>
> Please do NOT post binaries to this group.

1) no binaries attached--why are you *****ing about it?

2) nobody cares what you want, Navas. You're just blowing hot air.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Fri, 26 Nov 2004
06:43:53 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >Are these the sounds you are looking for?
>>
>> Please do NOT post binaries to this group.
>
>1) no binaries attached--why are you *****ing about it?

A binary was posted as message (0/0). You apparently didn't see it, probably
because many news providers filter binaries out from text groups (in
accordance with Usenet guidelines).

>[SNIP usual childishness]

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

Yup I screwed up, sorry about that, that's why I posted the link. My
bad.
---TheDoctor

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:24:25 GMT, John Navas
<[email protected]> wrote:

>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
>In <[email protected]> on Fri, 26 Nov 2004
>06:43:53 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>In article <[email protected]>,
>> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> >Are these the sounds you are looking for?
>>>
>>> Please do NOT post binaries to this group.
>>
>>1) no binaries attached--why are you *****ing about it?
>
>A binary was posted as message (0/0). You apparently didn't see it, probably
>because many news providers filter binaries out from text groups (in
>accordance with Usenet guidelines).
>
>>[SNIP usual childishness]