Moto v220 vs. Nokia 6340i

Kicking around the idea of switching from my 6340i to a Motorola V220.
I don't need/want the camera, I'm just after a smaller phone.

Any problems/complaints with the v220?

Thanks,

---

› See More: Moto v220 vs. Nokia 6340i

Except for the camera, I am pretty happy with my v220. I wish the earpeice
could be made a bit louder, but that's the only real negative. There are a
few annoying things, but I suppose you can get those with any phone: it
scratches fairly easily, the menu structure is a little odd, and the "dial"
button is on the "wrong" side. Battery life is excellent, and it seems to
maintain the connection very well. I get signal where I didn't before,
though that may be due to ATT towers- I can't say which it is. The v180 may
be the same phone without the camera.


"LoneGunman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Kicking around the idea of switching from my 6340i to a Motorola V220.
> I don't need/want the camera, I'm just after a smaller phone.
>
> Any problems/complaints with the v220?
>
> Thanks,

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 04:04:05 GMT, "Alan" <[email protected]> said in
alt.cellular.cingular:

>Except for the camera, I am pretty happy with my v220. I wish the earpeice
>could be made a bit louder, but that's the only real negative. There are a
>few annoying things, but I suppose you can get those with any phone: it
>scratches fairly easily, the menu structure is a little odd, and the "dial"
>button is on the "wrong" side. Battery life is excellent, and it seems to
>maintain the connection very well. I get signal where I didn't before,
>though that may be due to ATT towers- I can't say which it is. The v180 may
>be the same phone without the camera.

The V180 doesn't seem to be Motorola's best effort. We've had to take
a few back, due to no service in areas that other handsets only had
weak signal. We're returning our entire stock.