Results 1 to 4 of 4
- 12-26-2004, 02:41 PM #1Steve SobolGuest
Steve Sobol wrote:
> D.J. Osborn wrote:
>
>> Are you able to make and receive calls at no additional charge? If so,
>> then
>> whining about whether or not you get caller ID is just that: It's
>> whining.
>
>
> The call quality wasn't that wonderful, either. I only tried a couple
> calls. The phone was relatively new (a Kyo 2325) and it worked fine in
> Cleveland. Rather choppy. Hard to understand the guy on the other line.
It occurred to me that I didn't include that piece of information in the
previous post. I apologize. It was still early(ish) here when I posted it.
BTW, small world - I blew off (oops, I mean "spent") two years of college at
UD, have a bunch of friends in the Miami Valley, and it turns out now that my
brother is getting a job in New Carlisle and will be living in Old North Dayton.
And I am not surprised that Sprint's coverage isn't wonderful in Dayton.
Downstate seems to be a problem for them. My web/email/etc. sits on a leased
server colocated in Columbus, and the guy who runs my colo has used both Sprint
and VZW there and tells me he wasn't too impressed with Sprint either.
--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
› See More: Sprint vs Verizon (was Employee Benefits, etc.)
- 12-26-2004, 03:58 PM #2D.J. OsbornGuest
Re: Sprint vs Verizon (was Employee Benefits, etc.)
"Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Steve Sobol wrote:
> > D.J. Osborn wrote:
> >
> >> Are you able to make and receive calls at no additional charge? If so,
> >> then
> >> whining about whether or not you get caller ID is just that: It's
> >> whining.
> >
> >
> > The call quality wasn't that wonderful, either. I only tried a couple
> > calls. The phone was relatively new (a Kyo 2325) and it worked fine in
> > Cleveland. Rather choppy. Hard to understand the guy on the other line.
>
> It occurred to me that I didn't include that piece of information in the
> previous post. I apologize. It was still early(ish) here when I posted it.
>
> BTW, small world - I blew off (oops, I mean "spent") two years of college
at
> UD, have a bunch of friends in the Miami Valley, and it turns out now that
my
> brother is getting a job in New Carlisle and will be living in Old North
Dayton.
>
> And I am not surprised that Sprint's coverage isn't wonderful in Dayton.
> Downstate seems to be a problem for them. My web/email/etc. sits on a
leased
> server colocated in Columbus, and the guy who runs my colo has used both
Sprint
> and VZW there and tells me he wasn't too impressed with Sprint either.
Sprint's coverage "isn't wonderful" in many areas of the country. That's why
your continued whining about the VZW AC plan makes you appear to be so
goofy.
--
D.J., N8DO; FMCA 147762
dj[underscore]osborn at yahoo dot com
- 12-26-2004, 04:09 PM #3Scott StephensonGuest
Re: Sprint vs Verizon (was Employee Benefits, etc.)
"D.J. Osborn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Sprint's coverage "isn't wonderful" in many areas of the country. That's
why
> your continued whining about the VZW AC plan makes you appear to be so
> goofy.
>
> --
Neither is Verizon's, so you can both claim victory. The fact that this
portion of this thread has gone on so long about coverage that affects less
than 5% of the American population (and less than 3% at any given point in
time) shows that maybe its really not worth the energy. If you ask me,
coverage sucks with both carriers- I don't get a signal at my favorite
fishing spot up in the Rockies. Maybe I could beat that point to death for
a week or two here- seems to be the popular thing to do.
>
- 12-26-2004, 04:13 PM #4D.J. OsbornGuest
Re: Sprint vs Verizon (was Employee Benefits, etc.)
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "D.J. Osborn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >
> >
> > Sprint's coverage "isn't wonderful" in many areas of the country. That's
> why
> > your continued whining about the VZW AC plan makes you appear to be so
> > goofy.
> >
> > --
>
> Neither is Verizon's, so you can both claim victory. The fact that this
> portion of this thread has gone on so long about coverage that affects
less
> than 5% of the American population (and less than 3% at any given point in
> time) shows that maybe its really not worth the energy. If you ask me,
> coverage sucks with both carriers- I don't get a signal at my favorite
> fishing spot up in the Rockies. Maybe I could beat that point to death
for
> a week or two here- seems to be the popular thing to do.
That's certainly what Steve enjoys doing. Personally, I don't expect *any*
carries to work *everywhere*. I'm simply pleased that the VZW AC plan has
worked everywhere I've need it to work so far, and that other people's
experiences indicate that it probably will wherever I need to go in the
future.
--
D.J., N8DO; FMCA 147762
dj[underscore]osborn at yahoo dot com
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Sprint PCS
- Sprint PCS
- Verizon
- General Service Provider Forum
Aws gpu
in Chit Chat