AT&T Will Stay AT&T??

"Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 22:02:04 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >If they cant do what they said they'd do for a simple matter like
> > >rebadging stores, how the heck are they going to do a complex thing
like
> > >providing you with digital coverage in your boonies.
> >
> > You are just being silly.
>
> Sorry you wont face the facts.

Sorry you won't face the facts- you hide like a little child when
challenged, and I find it laughable. But you do make it easy to show you as
the fool you are- no response usually means none is necessary (i.e., you are
wrong).

---

› See More: AT&T Will Stay AT&T??

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Fri, 31 Dec
2004 22:02:04 GMT, Jack "Chicken Little" Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> "JohnF" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why is this such a hugh issue with you? Who cares if they've change the
>> signs or not. What difference will that make to anyone except you? I'd
>> rather they worry about something that actually matters like building out
>> their infrastructure to areasa where I can still only get analog.
>
>If they cant do what they said they'd do

They didn't

>for a simple matter like
>rebadging stores,

Not a simple matter.

>how the heck are they going to do a complex thing like
>providing you with digital coverage in your boonies.

No relationship whatsoever.

0 for 3

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

"Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "JohnF" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Why is this such a hugh issue with you? Who cares if they've change the
>> signs or not. What difference will that make to anyone except you? I'd
>> rather they worry about something that actually matters like building out
>> their infrastructure to areasa where I can still only get analog.
>
> If they cant do what they said they'd do for a simple matter like
> rebadging stores, how the heck are they going to do a complex thing like
> providing you with digital coverage in your boonies.

Maybe they're just concentrating on the things that matter like building out
the coverage in "my boonies" (I didn't know I had any "boonies") and simple
things like signage can wait? If they did state some sort of timeline for
"rebadging" stores, I for one certainly hope they've realized how low that
should be in their priority list and are treating it as such. That's the
last thing they need to worry about.

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 01:13:02 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 22:02:04 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >If they cant do what they said they'd do for a simple matter like
>> >rebadging stores, how the heck are they going to do a complex thing like
>> >providing you with digital coverage in your boonies.
>>
>> You are just being silly.
>
>Sorry you wont face the facts. Are you really Navas?

Child, you really *do* need to get over yourself in a big way. Next
thing you'll be hearing those black helicopters. And BTW sweetie John
Navas and John S. have been welcomed into my kill filter. You'll need
to find another conspiracy. That one didn't work. I can put you
there too if you'd like!

Re-badging stores doesn't have a damned thing to do with digital
coverage in the boonies. As I said you are just silly and don't argue
about the things that are important. Re-badging stores ain't gonna
affect no one except the anal-retentives who believe it should have
been done at midnight when cingular took over AT&T Wireless.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 03:01:09 GMT, "JohnF" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Maybe they're just concentrating on the things that matter like building out
>the coverage in "my boonies" (I didn't know I had any "boonies") and simple
>things like signage can wait? If they did state some sort of timeline for
>"rebadging" stores, I for one certainly hope they've realized how low that
>should be in their priority list and are treating it as such. That's the
>last thing they need to worry about.

Joe Naccio the former CEO of Qwest made a big deal about signage when
they took over USWest and someone aceded to his wishes and they just
put a tacky tarp sign over the US in USWest to make a new sign for the
USWest building in Denver. You can see how important that is now
since Naccio was given the boot. Signage is one of the least
important things.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -