Cingular can point out Verizon's Weakness in Ads

In article <BDFFF0C2.346F%[email protected]>,
SneakerFreak <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> On 1/4/05 4:57 AM, in article
> [email protected], "Jack Zwick"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Not so simple; Cingular has detailed agreements specifying where it
> > allows it's phones to roam, and its carefully controlled to keep
> > Cingular's costs down. But the poster's point was about Analog Networks,
> > and there are large geographic expanses where only an analog signal is
> > available, and Cingulars GSM phones do not have ANY analog capability,
> > with the exception of one or two older models that also do TDMA.
>
> So does Verizon - it's called a PRL. And they always recommend you update
> it by doing *228....
>
> I could care less about analog any more. I have not needed it in the past 3
> or 4 years with Verizon or ATT or now Cingular. My phones have worked where
> I need them and when I need them, except Verizon before I switched.

as long as you stay in the cities and near Interstates you'll likely be
OK.

---

› See More: Cingular can point out Verizon's Weakness in Ads

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 04 Jan
2005 12:14:41 GMT, Jack "Chicken Little" Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <BDFFF0C2.346F%[email protected]>,
> SneakerFreak <[email protected]> wrote:

>> I could care less about analog any more. I have not needed it in the past 3
>> or 4 years with Verizon or ATT or now Cingular. My phones have worked where
>> I need them and when I need them, except Verizon before I switched.
>
>as long as you stay in the cities and near Interstates you'll likely be
>OK.

You'll also likely be OK well outside of those areas.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>