John Navas - Does Cingular pay you?

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> >And why can't you get over the fact that one time, you "created" a
> >newsgroup?
>
> I've gotten over it.

You haven't--because you can't shut up about it.

CAN'T. Not "won't". CAN'T.

I dare you to go one year, all of 2005 from this point forward, never
mentioning here or anywhere else that you created this newsgroup.

You won't be able to do it. I guarantee it.

---

› See More: John Navas - Does Cingular pay you?

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005
23:26:04 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

>> In other words, you have no clue (as usual).
>
>I have more clue than you can ever know.

LOL

>> Go crawl back under your rock.
>
>You really don't like me, because I can expose you for the fraud you are.

I just don't respect you, because you lack manners and respect for the rights
of others. I neither like nor dislike you.

>Next time: newsgroup 101.

Hopefully you'll learn something, but I tend to doubt it.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005
23:27:29 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >What you DO. Not what you DID. What you DO.
>>
>> What I "do" isn't necessarily time sensitive (except of course to you).
>
>So you're telling us that what you DO is create newsgroups? ...

No. Try again.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005
23:28:12 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >Let me ask you again, since you so pointedly dodged the question: how
>> >long did it take you to "create" this newsgroup (number of minutes,
>> >hours, days, etc. over how many sessions) and how long ago was that?
>>
>> Let me tell you again, you don't deserve any answers.
>
>In other words, you know you've been outed on all of this, and you
>refuse to answer based on the grounds that it may tend to incriminate
>you.

No, 0 for 2.

>What is it you do, anyway? ...

Consulting. And you?

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005
23:29:21 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >Why would be a great thing to know. Better yet is your telling us just
>> >why you think what you do here is a public service. Not what you DID in
>> >one brief period many, many years ago; what you DO. NOW. TODAY. And
>> >DAILY. EVERY DAY. Why do you consider that a public service?
>>
>> Has value
>
>Bull****.

0 for 3.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 03 Jan 2005
23:30:20 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >And why can't you get over the fact that one time, you "created" a
>> >newsgroup?
>>
>> I've gotten over it.
>
>You haven't--because you can't shut up about it.

0 for 4.

>I dare you to go one year, all of 2005 from this point forward, never
>mentioning here or anywhere else that you created this newsgroup.

Why should I?

You are obviously jealous and insecure. Oh well.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <[email protected]>,
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >And why can't you get over the fact that one time, you "created" a
> > >newsgroup?
> >
> > I've gotten over it.
>
> You haven't--because you can't shut up about it.
>
> CAN'T. Not "won't". CAN'T.
>
> I dare you to go one year, all of 2005 from this point forward, never
> mentioning here or anywhere else that you created this newsgroup.
>
> You won't be able to do it. I guarantee it.

Worse yet his his lame attempts to be an overbearing moderator enforcing
a self-written charter which is meaningless in an unmoderated newsgroup
as this is. He lambasts someone who once in their life mentions they are
selling one phone on ebay; but lets slide without complaint Porno spam.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 04 Jan
2005 10:00:26 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

>Worse yet his his lame attempts to be an overbearing moderator enforcing
>a self-written charter which is meaningless in an unmoderated newsgroup
>as this is. He lambasts someone who once in their life mentions they are
>selling one phone on ebay; but lets slide without complaint Porno spam.

Wrong on all counts. Par for your course.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> See:
> http://www.visi.com/~barr/alt-creation-guide.html
> http://nylon.net/alt/newgroup.htm
> http://www.gweep.ca/~edmonds/usenet/good-newgroup.html


Thank you for providing the references (and proving my point). Look pretty
straight forward. A new cell company starts up called "xyz cellular". People
start talking about it on another group (or I generate discussion by
blessing everyone with my wisdom on the subject). Since I can show there is
already discussion (10 posts per day) and can provide a simple argument that
because there is enough discussion and it makes sense that there should be a
group for a new cellular company the group 'alt.cellular.xyz' gets created.
Since there are already 22 different 'alt.cellular' groups that argument
can't be that intense. If you spent hours on this you tried too hard.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 04 Jan
2005 15:30:50 GMT, "JohnF" <[email protected]> wrote:

>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> See:
>> http://www.visi.com/~barr/alt-creation-guide.html
>> http://nylon.net/alt/newgroup.htm
>> http://www.gweep.ca/~edmonds/usenet/good-newgroup.html
>
>Thank you for providing the references

You're welcome.

>(and proving my point).

I didn't (but you are of course free to claim whatever you want).

>Look pretty
>straight forward.

But then you've never actually done it.

>A new cell company starts up called "xyz cellular". People
>start talking about it on another group (or I generate discussion by
>blessing everyone with my wisdom on the subject). Since I can show there is
>already discussion (10 posts per day) and can provide a simple argument that
>because there is enough discussion and it makes sense that there should be a
>group for a new cellular company the group 'alt.cellular.xyz' gets created.

Just like that? That's not how it works.

>Since there are already 22 different 'alt.cellular' groups

On your news server. Others have less or more. That's the nature of alt,
where many created newsgroups fail to establish themselves.

>that argument
>can't be that intense.

That just shows lack of experience.

>If you spent hours on this you tried too hard.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>