John's favorite ringtones

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Wed, 19 Jan
2005 21:22:48 GMT, Jack "FUDMEISTER" Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Since you seem to be so concerned and confused: I am through with the
>> discussion, but will continue to defend myself against childish ad hominem
>> attacks. Got that?
>
>12 now, by the leading child in this newsgroup, who just again
>contradicted himself.

I see that your reading comprehension problem is every bit as severe as
your emotional problems. I urge you to seek professional help. Seriously.

--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>

"A little learning is a dangerous thing." [Alexander Pope]
"It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." [Mark Twain]

---

› See More: John's favorite ringtones

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:%[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 18 Jan 2005
19:39:24 -0700,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >John- you need to get a grip. ...
>
> No, Scott, and with all due respect, you are the one that needs to get a
grip.
>
> --
How so? I'm in an area of personal expertise here- you have yet to admit
that you have no experience with musical copyrights and are applying at best
a novice understanding of the laws as they apply. Everytime someone brings
a higher level of information that counters your argument, you conveniently
raise the bar for what would be acceptable proof. Those of us that have
actually used the musical copyright laws quite a few times are told that we
can't possibly know what we are talking about, and that your personal,
inexperiemced position makes more sense. I'm not the one selectively
clipping snippets of the previous post out of context to make a point,
avoiding the meat of the post and only focusing on select phrases. I'm not
the one accusing you of getting "too emotional" when you try to defend your
very weak position. I'm not the one avoiding direct questions asked of me,
or deflecting them with nonresponsive answers. I'm not the one stating that
we're not lawyers here, followed by a novice interpretation of the law that
is supposed to justify acts. I'm not the one here who is incapable of
admitting error or mistake out of some pompous need to appear to be
all-knowing.

Your inability to see these flaws as it relates directly to this thread
brings all of your postings under suspicion. Just how much of your
'expertise' in other areas is as much smoke and mirrors as this one? I am
absolutely willing to put my professional credentials with regard to
cellular up against yours any day of the week- I'll even do it right here,
if need be, and will provide references off-line if you feel my integrity
might be an issue. And after that's done, let's look at posting patterns- a
smart guy like you, using your friend Google, should be able to determine at
least two areas of cellular that I never post about. Why? Because its not
an area that I can provide meaningful insight into. I'll even give you hint
to find one of them- in one of Jack's other incarnations, I commented that I
would never challenge his knowledge in this area because the information he
was providing was as good as any out there, no matter what crap he posted on
other topics. And if Jack thinks about it long enough, he can probably
remember and verify that I am speaking the truth here.

Unlike you, I don't need to be the ultimate know-it-all about everything.
As I said, YOU need to get a grip.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:18:31 -0700,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:%[email protected]...
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 18 Jan 2005
>19:39:24 -0700,
>> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >John- you need to get a grip. ...
>>
>> No, Scott, and with all due respect, you are the one that needs to get a
>grip.
>>
>> --
>How so? ...

Do I really need to repeat it? Hopefully not.

>Unlike you, I don't need to be the ultimate know-it-all about everything.

Really? Then why are you acting that way? (rhetorical question

>As I said, YOU need to get a grip.

This has gotten pretty childish, so I'm giving you the last word, in the hope
that you'll grow up a bit and give it a rest. Have a nice day.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Wed, 19 Jan 2005
18:18:31 -0700,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:%[email protected]...
> >>
> >> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 18 Jan 2005
> >19:39:24 -0700,
> >> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >John- you need to get a grip. ...
> >>
> >> No, Scott, and with all due respect, you are the one that needs to get
a
> >grip.
> >>
> >> --
> >How so? ...
>
> Do I really need to repeat it? Hopefully not.

Repeat what? I left your post intact. Wish you could say the same- once
again, the meat of the post is not included or responded to. Is that the
childish part (selective clipping) you are referring to below?

>
> >Unlike you, I don't need to be the ultimate know-it-all about everything.
>
> Really? Then why are you acting that way? (rhetorical question

You obviously didn't read the entire previous post, where I made such an
admission easily verified. And I guess this last clip from you deserves a
pretty typical Navas response- thanks for agreeing that you need to be the
ultimate know-it-all.

>
> >As I said, YOU need to get a grip.
>
> This has gotten pretty childish, so I'm giving you the last word, in the
hope
> that you'll grow up a bit and give it a rest. Have a nice day.
>

I'm being very mature here- you are the one who is acting quite childish,
both in your selective quoting and avoidance of the issues at hand. As far
as growing up goes- I'l wait a while. You obviously need some time to catch
up.

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In <[email protected]> on Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:18:31 -0700,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:%[email protected]...
> >>
> >> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 18 Jan 2005
> >19:39:24 -0700,
> >> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >John- you need to get a grip. ...
> >>
> >> No, Scott, and with all due respect, you are the one that needs to get a
> >grip.
> >>
> >> --
> >How so? ...
>
> Do I really need to repeat it? Hopefully not.
>
> >Unlike you, I don't need to be the ultimate know-it-all about everything.
>
> Really? Then why are you acting that way? (rhetorical question
>
> >As I said, YOU need to get a grip.
>
> This has gotten pretty childish, so I'm giving you the last word, in the hope
> that you'll grow up a bit and give it a rest. Have a nice day.


Elmo, do you really think this is Navas' last word? Last time he said
that, it was followed by 12 more posts to the thread, all cross-posted
in clear violation of his own charter.