I Don't Think Anyone Under 16

I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.

---

› See More: I Don't Think Anyone Under 16

"Solsonai" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
> Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.

Who cares???

Solsonai wrote:
>
> I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
> Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.

I don't think people who post, in newsgroups, should
capitalize the first letter of every word.

Notan

On 4 Jan 2005 19:20:11 -0800, Solsonai wrote:

> I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
> Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.

Hmmm. I never got drunk on a cellphone.....

In article <[email protected]>,
"Solsonai" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
> Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.

Sorry the 15 year old you know is apparently unresponsible. The vast
majority of 15 year olds are upstanding junior citizens.

Solsonai wrote:
> I Don't Think [...]

Now, see... that's your problem. You should't be doing that. What's
more, you should know better than to venture unsolicited opinions, lest
someone tell you exactly what their value really is.

-n

On 4 Jan 2005 19:20:11 -0800, "Solsonai" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
>Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.

And how did you come to this conclusion? Were you not mature enough
at 14 to use one? Did you ever think that someone younger might
perhaps be given a prepaid "pay as you go" phone so they'd learn to
control their spending habits? Of course you didn't. It would be too
hard to use any logic.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

You know, I am deeply amused by all the replies this simple post got.

I have a felling someone was playing some sort of word game like MAD-LIBS
and came up with this and then posted it here. I feel that might explain why
every word has the first letter capitalized.


I DON'T THINK ANYONE (random age group) SHOULD HAVE A (random noun)
BECAUSE IT'S LIKE GIVING A (random noun) TO A (random age group different
from one above)

I bet that the person who posted this is sitting back and laughing at how
seriously some of us are taking this random piece of writing.


-julie




"Solsonai" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
> Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.
>

Julie Ruin wrote:
>
> You know, I am deeply amused by all the replies this simple post got.
>
> I have a felling someone was playing some sort of word game like MAD-LIBS
> and came up with this and then posted it here. I feel that might explain why
> every word has the first letter capitalized.
>
> I DON'T THINK ANYONE (random age group) SHOULD HAVE A (random noun)
> BECAUSE IT'S LIKE GIVING A (random noun) TO A (random age group different
> from one above)
>
> I bet that the person who posted this is sitting back and laughing at how
> seriously some of us are taking this random piece of writing.

MAD-LIBS?

*Now* you're showing your age! <g>

Notan

On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:42:21 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> "Solsonai" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
>> Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.
>
>Sorry the 15 year old you know is apparently unresponsible. The vast
>majority of 15 year olds are upstanding junior citizens.

Most of the 15-year-olds I know are snot-nosed punks who expect to
have everything handed to them on a silver platter. I think kids
should have cell phones, alright, implanted in their skulls with a
tracking mechanism available to the authorities. It would cut crime
in this country by about 2/3 overnight.

Charlie

Smiling Wickedly, Jack Zwick answered:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> Charlie Wilkes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Most of the 15-year-olds I know are snot-nosed punks who expect to
>>have everything handed to them on a silver platter. I think kids
>>should have cell phones, alright, implanted in their skulls with a
>>tracking mechanism available to the authorities. It would cut crime
>>in this country by about 2/3 overnight.
>
>
> Now knowing what crowd you run with, I know to ignore your posts.

WHY? He's RIGHT!

--
*..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- Michael -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:06:23 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> Charlie Wilkes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Most of the 15-year-olds I know are snot-nosed punks who expect to
>> have everything handed to them on a silver platter. I think kids
>> should have cell phones, alright, implanted in their skulls with a
>> tracking mechanism available to the authorities. It would cut crime
>> in this country by about 2/3 overnight.
>
>Now knowing what crowd you run with, I know to ignore your posts.

Hmmm. Not much pep in your step, Jack. Have you had a good bowel
movement in the past 72 hours? I'll bet you haven't. Here is some
literature for you to peruse:

http://www.lifeknox.com/index2.htm

It could be the beginning of a bright new you.

Charlie

In article <[email protected]>,
Charlie Wilkes <[email protected]> wrote:

> It could be the beginning of a bright new you.

PLONK

Charlie Wilkes wrote:
>
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:42:21 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > "Solsonai" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I Don't Think Anyone Under 16 Should Have A Cell Phone
> >> Because It's like Giving A Beer To A 14 Year-Old.
> >
> >Sorry the 15 year old you know is apparently unresponsible. The vast
> >majority of 15 year olds are upstanding junior citizens.
>
> Most of the 15-year-olds I know are snot-nosed punks who expect to
> have everything handed to them on a silver platter. I think kids
> should have cell phones, alright, implanted in their skulls with a
> tracking mechanism available to the authorities. It would cut crime
> in this country by about 2/3 overnight.

My wife and I have always said that if we ever had kids (we won't...
too old!), we implant Lo-Jack devices in them. <g>

With crimes-against-children being what they are, it's the only way
to go!!!

Notan

Charlie Wilkes wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:06:23 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> Charlie Wilkes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Most of the 15-year-olds I know are snot-nosed punks who expect to
>>> have everything handed to them on a silver platter. I think kids
>>> should have cell phones, alright, implanted in their skulls with a
>>> tracking mechanism available to the authorities. It would cut crime
>>> in this country by about 2/3 overnight.
>>
>> Now knowing what crowd you run with, I know to ignore your posts.
>
> Hmmm. Not much pep in your step, Jack. Have you had a good bowel
> movement in the past 72 hours? I'll bet you haven't. Here is some
> literature for you to peruse:
>
> http://www.lifeknox.com/index2.htm
>
> It could be the beginning of a bright new you.
>
> Charlie

Charlie ... how did YOU run across this link?