Results 61 to 63 of 63
- 01-23-2005, 04:52 PM #61Jiu JitSuperflyGuest
Re: "Sprint Sells Service To AT&T Mobile"
"Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Jiu JitSuperfly" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Jiu JitSuperfly wrote:
> > > > Duh, no it's not. As usual your reading comprehension is quite
> > deficient.
> > > > They have a marketing agreement. Onstar works in places where
Verizon
> > has
> > > > ZERO coverage.
> > >
> > > > You need to quit trying to see things that aren't there.
> > >
> > > What part of "Onstar has agreements with several cellular carriers"
are
> > you
> > > failing to comprehend?
> > >
> > > You can't work with just one carrier and guarantee nationwide
coverage.
> > Even
> > > the biggest carriers don't have comprehensive coverage.
> >
> > Again reading comprehension comes into play. I was making the point that
> > Onstar is not a Verizon only service provider you snot licking moron.
Now go
> > take your seat on the back of the short bus and shut up. Let the grown
ups
> > talk.
>
> Why the insults. so childish.
Have you learned nothing?
Haven't I punked you and Navas enough already?
You are my *****.
--
JJS
p.s. I did go a little overboard on Mr. Sobol and for that I apologize.
› See More: "Sprint Sells Service To AT&T Mobile"
- 01-26-2005, 02:46 PM #62John NavasGuest
Re: "Sprint Sells Service To AT&T Mobile"
Profit. Sprint also wholesales service to Virgin Mobile, Qwest, and others.
p.s. Please don't switch posting styles (top vs bottom) in mid-thread -- it's
confusing, and considered a bit rude. Thanks.
In <cuaId.12774$nt.7630@fed1read06> on Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:55:36 -0800, "Mij
Adyaw" <[email protected]> wrote:
>This response does not explain why Sprint is selling service to ATT Mobile?
>WASSUP with that?
>
>"Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "John Phillips" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, at 17:45:30 [GMT GMT] (04:45:30 Tuesday, 18 January
>>> 2005 where I live) "John Navas" wrote:
>>>
>>> > Starting in the first half of 2005, AT&T will begin marketing
>>> > Sprint's service after it wins back rights to its name, owned by
>>> > Cingular after the merger.
>>>
>>> Why would Cingular allow that to happen?
>>
>> When AT&T originally spun of ATTWS, they had a proviso in the agreement
>> that
>> ATTWS had to stop using the AT&T trademarks and logos in the event they
>> merged.
>>
>> Cingular did not, and could not, buy AT&T's logo. I believe that they get
>> to use if for 6 months after the merger date, as they wean ATTWS customers
>> to their network, after which it reverts back to AT&T.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 01-28-2005, 01:22 AM #63John NavasGuest
Re: "Sprint Sells Service To AT&T Mobile"
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Fri, 21 Jan 2005
20:11:29 GMT, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>"Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:jzwick3-
>>
>> Just the name reverts back. April 23.
>
>I don't follow you--the name, but not the logo, reverts back?
Only the name was licensed, not the logo.
>I did read a press release that AT&T issued, saying emphatically that they
>would be back in the wireless business "the day after" they got their name
>back. ...
Really? Citation?
>... Who knows, AT&T may be setting their
>sights on a new generation of phones. Satellite, like OnStar, maybe??? Who
>knows?
Anyone paying attention -- AT&T has no spectrum, or satellites either.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.attws
- alt.cellular.verizon
- ATT
- alt.cellular.verizon
Seamless Hosting Solutions for Creative Professionals
in Chit Chat