Results 1 to 15 of 16
- 08-11-2005, 04:47 AM #1BobGuest
How is the main display on the RAZR outdoors in sunlight? I currently have
a Sony Ericsson Z500a and find the display very hard to see outdoors.
Thanks
› See More: RAZR in sunlight
- 08-11-2005, 05:33 AM #2Jimmy SmithGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
very difficult to see no matter what brightness settings.
"Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> How is the main display on the RAZR outdoors in sunlight? I currently
> have a Sony Ericsson Z500a and find the display very hard to see outdoors.
>
> Thanks
>
>
- 08-11-2005, 05:35 AM #3ThurmanGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
"Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> How is the main display on the RAZR outdoors in sunlight? I currently
> have a Sony Ericsson Z500a and find the display very hard to see outdoors.
My Razr is two months old and the outdoor display is poor. I'm surprised how
bad it is in the shade of a tree.
At worse case with my PPC-PE, I can hold the display in direct sunlight and
read it, but not the Razr.
- 08-12-2005, 09:06 PM #4Steven de MenaGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
"Jimmy Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> very difficult to see no matter what brightness settings.
>
>
> "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> How is the main display on the RAZR outdoors in sunlight? I currently
>> have a Sony Ericsson Z500a and find the display very hard to see
>> outdoors.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
I bright sunlight I think most, or all, displays are going to wash out....
Steve
- 08-13-2005, 06:46 AM #5John NavasGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Fri, 12 Aug
2005 20:06:07 -0700, "Steven de Mena" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I bright sunlight I think most, or all, displays are going to wash out....
Big differences between different types of displays -- in bright light:
* Backlit displays wash out
* Reflective displays get better
* Transflective displays are in the middle
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-13-2005, 08:16 AM #6Mike S.Guest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
In article <[email protected]>,
Steven de Mena <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Jimmy Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> very difficult to see no matter what brightness settings.
>>
>>
>> "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> How is the main display on the RAZR outdoors in sunlight? I currently
>>> have a Sony Ericsson Z500a and find the display very hard to see
>>> outdoors.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>
>I bright sunlight I think most, or all, displays are going to wash out....
A transflective display, such as used on the V6xx models, will do better
than the transmissive displays employed on less expensive phones.
Why Motorola chose to use the less effective display technology on their
"flagship" Razr model is incomprehensible.
- 08-15-2005, 12:55 AM #7John NavasGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:16:46 +0000 (UTC),
[email protected] (Mike S.) wrote:
>A transflective display, such as used on the V6xx models, will do better
>than the transmissive displays employed on less expensive phones.
>
>Why Motorola chose to use the less effective display technology on their
>"flagship" Razr model is incomprehensible.
I suspect it was a simple matter of form factor; i.e., thin.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-15-2005, 07:22 AM #8Don Udel \(ETC\)Guest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
Hmmm. Thin vs usable. Good choice.
Don
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:B%WLe.9222$p%[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:16:46 +0000
> (UTC),
> [email protected] (Mike S.) wrote:
>
>>A transflective display, such as used on the V6xx models, will do better
>>than the transmissive displays employed on less expensive phones.
>>
>>Why Motorola chose to use the less effective display technology on their
>>"flagship" Razr model is incomprehensible.
>
> I suspect it was a simple matter of form factor; i.e., thin.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-15-2005, 08:19 AM #9John NavasGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
The choice is made by the consumer.
p.s. Please don't switch posting styles (top vs bottom) in mid-thread -- it's
confusing, and considered a bit rude. Thanks.
In <[email protected]> on Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:22:26 -0400, "Don
Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hmmm. Thin vs usable. Good choice.
>
>Don
>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:B%WLe.9222$p%[email protected]...
>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:16:46 +0000
>> (UTC),
>> [email protected] (Mike S.) wrote:
>>
>>>A transflective display, such as used on the V6xx models, will do better
>>>than the transmissive displays employed on less expensive phones.
>>>
>>>Why Motorola chose to use the less effective display technology on their
>>>"flagship" Razr model is incomprehensible.
>>
>> I suspect it was a simple matter of form factor; i.e., thin.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-15-2005, 11:05 AM #10Don Udel \(ETC\)Guest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
Hmm, I'll check Ms Manners. Nope nothing there about posting top vs
bottom.
Sorry.
Don
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:cw1Me.9242$p%[email protected]...
> The choice is made by the consumer.
>
> p.s. Please don't switch posting styles (top vs bottom) in mid-thread --
> it's
> confusing, and considered a bit rude. Thanks.
>
> In <[email protected]> on Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:22:26 -0400,
> "Don
> Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hmmm. Thin vs usable. Good choice.
>>
>>Don
>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:B%WLe.9222$p%[email protected]...
>>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>>
>>> In <[email protected]> on Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:16:46 +0000
>>> (UTC),
>>> [email protected] (Mike S.) wrote:
>>>
>>>>A transflective display, such as used on the V6xx models, will do better
>>>>than the transmissive displays employed on less expensive phones.
>>>>
>>>>Why Motorola chose to use the less effective display technology on their
>>>>"flagship" Razr model is incomprehensible.
>>>
>>> I suspect it was a simple matter of form factor; i.e., thin.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-15-2005, 02:42 PM #11John NavasGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
See Q7 of "Quoting Style in Newsgroup Postings"
<http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nnq/nquote.html> (published by the
news.newusers.questions Moderation Board)
In <[email protected]> on Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:05:49 -0400, "Don
Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hmm, I'll check Ms Manners. Nope nothing there about posting top vs
>bottom.
>
>Sorry.
>
>Don
>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:cw1Me.9242$p%[email protected]...
>> The choice is made by the consumer.
>>
>> p.s. Please don't switch posting styles (top vs bottom) in mid-thread --
>> it's
>> confusing, and considered a bit rude. Thanks.
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:22:26 -0400,
>> "Don
>> Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Hmmm. Thin vs usable. Good choice.
>>>
>>>Don
>>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:B%WLe.9222$p%[email protected]...
>>>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>>>
>>>> In <[email protected]> on Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:16:46 +0000
>>>> (UTC),
>>>> [email protected] (Mike S.) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>A transflective display, such as used on the V6xx models, will do better
>>>>>than the transmissive displays employed on less expensive phones.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why Motorola chose to use the less effective display technology on their
>>>>>"flagship" Razr model is incomprehensible.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect it was a simple matter of form factor; i.e., thin.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
>> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
>
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-19-2005, 06:07 AM #12Don Udel \(ETC\)Guest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
John,
You need to read it your self. You focused so much on topic 7 that you
missed the big intro at the beginning. I don't see any reference to rude.
Don
Introduction
This document is a description of the traditionally accepted "quoting style"
in Usenet newsgroup postings. Please do not consider this to be a
"regulatory" document ("Thou shalt do it this way because we say so!"), but
rather as an "advocacy" document ("A lot of people think this is a good way
to do it, and here's why.").
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:_67Me.9296$p%[email protected]...
> See Q7 of "Quoting Style in Newsgroup Postings"
> <http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nnq/nquote.html> (published by the
> news.newusers.questions Moderation Board)
>
> In <[email protected]> on Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:05:49 -0400,
> "Don
> Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hmm, I'll check Ms Manners. Nope nothing there about posting top vs
>>bottom.
>>
>>Sorry.
>>
>>Don
>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:cw1Me.9242$p%[email protected]...
>>> The choice is made by the consumer.
>>>
>>> p.s. Please don't switch posting styles (top vs bottom) in
>>> mid-thread --
>>> it's
>>> confusing, and considered a bit rude. Thanks.
>>>
>>> In <[email protected]> on Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:22:26 -0400,
>>> "Don
>>> Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hmmm. Thin vs usable. Good choice.
>>>>
>>>>Don
>>>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:B%WLe.9222$p%[email protected]...
>>>>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>>>>
>>>>> In <[email protected]> on Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:16:46 +0000
>>>>> (UTC),
>>>>> [email protected] (Mike S.) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>A transflective display, such as used on the V6xx models, will do
>>>>>>better
>>>>>>than the transmissive displays employed on less expensive phones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why Motorola chose to use the less effective display technology on
>>>>>>their
>>>>>>"flagship" Razr model is incomprehensible.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect it was a simple matter of form factor; i.e., thin.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
>>> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 08-19-2005, 09:52 AM #13Dr. Ray BattyGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:07:54 -0400, "Don Udel \(ETC\)"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>You need to read it your self. You focused so much on topic 7 that you
>missed the big intro at the beginning. I don't see any reference to rude.
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
- 08-19-2005, 12:39 PM #14ednaGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
to a techno-dork, maybe
<< considered a bit rude. Thanks.>>
- 08-20-2005, 08:21 AM #15John NavasGuest
Re: RAZR in sunlight
I suggest you take your own advice, and actually pay attention to it, instead
of just trying to find something to serve your own preference.
In <[email protected]> on Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:07:54 -0400, "Don
Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>John,
>
>You need to read it your self. You focused so much on topic 7 that you
>missed the big intro at the beginning. I don't see any reference to rude.
>
>Don
>
>
>Introduction
>This document is a description of the traditionally accepted "quoting style"
>in Usenet newsgroup postings. Please do not consider this to be a
>"regulatory" document ("Thou shalt do it this way because we say so!"), but
>rather as an "advocacy" document ("A lot of people think this is a good way
>to do it, and here's why.").
>
>
>
>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:_67Me.9296$p%[email protected]...
>> See Q7 of "Quoting Style in Newsgroup Postings"
>> <http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nnq/nquote.html> (published by the
>> news.newusers.questions Moderation Board)
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:05:49 -0400,
>> "Don
>> Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Hmm, I'll check Ms Manners. Nope nothing there about posting top vs
>>>bottom.
>>>
>>>Sorry.
>>>
>>>Don
>>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:cw1Me.9242$p%[email protected]...
>>>> The choice is made by the consumer.
>>>>
>>>> p.s. Please don't switch posting styles (top vs bottom) in
>>>> mid-thread --
>>>> it's
>>>> confusing, and considered a bit rude. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> In <[email protected]> on Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:22:26 -0400,
>>>> "Don
>>>> Udel \(ETC\)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hmmm. Thin vs usable. Good choice.
>>>>>
>>>>>Don
>>>>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:B%WLe.9222$p%[email protected]...
>>>>>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In <[email protected]> on Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:16:46 +0000
>>>>>> (UTC),
>>>>>> [email protected] (Mike S.) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A transflective display, such as used on the V6xx models, will do
>>>>>>>better
>>>>>>>than the transmissive displays employed on less expensive phones.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why Motorola chose to use the less effective display technology on
>>>>>>>their
>>>>>>>"flagship" Razr model is incomprehensible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect it was a simple matter of form factor; i.e., thin.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
>>>> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
>> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
>
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
Similar Threads
- Motorola RAZR
- Motorola RAZR
- Motorola RAZR
- Motorola RAZR
How to Network Unlock Your Samsung Galaxy S24 from Claro
in Samsung