Results 1 to 12 of 12
- 09-28-2005, 08:37 PM #1KevinGuest
I am looking to buy a used Cincular GSM phone to replace my nearly worn out
T720. Current offerings that I am considering are the V180, V220, and the
V551. I could care less about camera and bluetooth features, just need a
rugged, reliable phone, as I am a heavy user. Would like to be able to just
move my SIM card over and keep running. Which of the three I have listed
would be the best pick? Thanks,
KB
› See More: Motorola GSM phone opinions
- 09-28-2005, 09:12 PM #2τΏτ¬Guest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
"Kevin" <kberlenatticzdot.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
:I am looking to buy a used Cincular GSM phone to replace my nearly worn out
: T720. Current offerings that I am considering are the V180, V220, and the
: V551. I could care less about camera and bluetooth features, just need a
: rugged, reliable phone, as I am a heavy user. Would like to be able to
just
: move my SIM card over and keep running. Which of the three I have listed
: would be the best pick? Thanks,
:
: KB
Have the v551 and the v3. The v3 reception is far better than the v551. I
would recommend the v3. Either one will accept the T720's sim card.
-Wayne
- 09-28-2005, 10:16 PM #3John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:37:04 -0500,
"Kevin" <kberlenatticzdot.com> wrote:
>I am looking to buy a used Cincular GSM phone to replace my nearly worn out
>T720. Current offerings that I am considering are the V180, V220, and the
>V551. I could care less about camera and bluetooth features, just need a
>rugged, reliable phone, as I am a heavy user. Would like to be able to just
>move my SIM card over and keep running. Which of the three I have listed
>would be the best pick? Thanks,
The V180 and V220 are bargain phones with mediocre performance.
The V551 is an excellent high-end phone, with top performance (comparable to
the RAZR V3, notwithstanding the other earlier response to your question, as
well as other phones.)
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-29-2005, 10:27 AM #4John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005
06:21:39 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The V551 is an excellent high-end phone, with top performance
>
>Bull****.
You've actually said as much yourself, and I've previously explained why your
unfortunate experience doesn't actually say anything about the V551.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-29-2005, 10:47 AM #5John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005
12:37:40 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >> The V551 is an excellent high-end phone, with top performance
>> >
>> >Bull****.
>>
>> You've actually said as much yourself, and I've previously explained why your
>> unfortunate experience doesn't actually say anything about the V551.
>
>And I've explained to you how full of bull**** you are, on many
>different issues that you've brought up, yet you seem to think that you
>are de facto the authority on anything you choose to speak on.
Grow up.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-29-2005, 01:35 PM #6John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:45:05
-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
>she's pleased with it.
>
><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
>it- >
>
>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...
Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
model.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-29-2005, 02:25 PM #7John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:07:42
-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:35:41 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:45:05
>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
>>>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
>>>she's pleased with it.
>>>
>>><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
>>>it- >
>>>
>>>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
>>>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...
>>
>>Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
>>model.
>
>If you want to show me a manufacture web page that would back that up,
>I'd be more than glad to read it.
That's a joke, right?
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-29-2005, 04:18 PM #8t72pwrdGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
Bull****!
Sorry, had to do it, LOL
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005
> 11:45:05
> -0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
>>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
>>she's pleased with it.
>>
>><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
>>it- >
>>
>>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
>>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...
>
> Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
> model.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-29-2005, 05:41 PM #9John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005
18:47:34 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >And I've explained to you how full of bull**** you are, on many
>> >different issues that you've brought up, yet you seem to think that you
>> >are de facto the authority on anything you choose to speak on.
>>
>> Grow up.
>
>What? No "Nonsense!"? At least you don't deny it.
How childish.
>You do honestly
>believe that you are de facto the authority on anything you choose to
>speak on.
Wrong again.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-29-2005, 05:42 PM #10John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:18:18
-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:25:52 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:07:42
>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:35:41 GMT, John Navas
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:45:05
>>>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
>>>>>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
>>>>>she's pleased with it.
>>>>>
>>>>><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
>>>>>it- >
>>>>>
>>>>>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
>>>>>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...
>>>>
>>>>Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
>>>>model.
>>>
>>>If you want to show me a manufacture web page that would back that up,
>>>I'd be more than glad to read it.
>>
>>That's a joke, right?
>
>Nope...Don't know you well enough to joke- If you don't have one,
>then I'll take your post to be an "opinion" then.
You are of course welcome to take my post however you want in any event.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-29-2005, 05:43 PM #11John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:18:21
GMT, "t72pwrd" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Bull****!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Sorry, had to do it, LOL
No self control?
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
- 09-30-2005, 12:43 PM #12John NavasGuest
Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:25:02
-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:42:28 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:18:18
>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:25:52 GMT, John Navas
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:07:42
>>>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:35:41 GMT, John Navas
>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:45:05
>>>>>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
>>>>>>>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
>>>>>>>she's pleased with it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
>>>>>>>it- >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
>>>>>>>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
>>>>>>model.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you want to show me a manufacture web page that would back that up,
>>>>>I'd be more than glad to read it.
>>>>
>>>>That's a joke, right?
>>>
>>>Nope...Don't know you well enough to joke- If you don't have one,
>>>then I'll take your post to be an "opinion" then.
>>
>>You are of course welcome to take my post however you want in any event.
>
>I can assure you, I need no assistance in that department.
Thanks for sharing.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
Similar Threads
- Motorola
- alt.cellular.motorola
- alt.cellular.motorola
- alt.cellular.cingular
How can I decode the VIN of my Volvo?
in Chit Chat