Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    John Navas
    Guest
    [POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on 19 Oct 2005
    15:02:03 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

    >I hope this is the right forum for this.


    alt.cellular.cingular would be more appropriate.

    >I live about 100 feet from a SBC cell tower.


    Presumably Cingular.

    > The tower is about
    >120 ft high. I have observed three types of lines going into the
    >building complex/power station. One it a regular voltage power line.
    >Second, is a regular phone line, that I suppose techs use to contact
    >home office. Third is a fiber optics line.
    >
    >I was wondering is there anything I could tap into as far as either
    >getting Internet access? Would I still need an antenna for
    >picking up transmissions from the tower?


    You need a Cingular wireless device and data plan.

    >Would it be better to splice
    >into the fiber optic cable?


    That'a a joke, right?

    >What would that cable contain? Are there other forums that would have
    >more info?


    alt.prison

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



    See More: Cell Tower Question




  2. #2
    Jeff Liebermann
    Guest

    Re: Cell Tower Question

    On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:21:06 GMT, John Navas
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >>I was wondering is there anything I could tap into as far as either
    >>getting Internet access? Would I still need an antenna for
    >>picking up transmissions from the tower?

    >
    >>Would it be better to splice
    >>into the fiber optic cable?


    >That'a a joke, right?


    You're no fun. As the unofficial representative of the Dark Side(tm),
    I think it's perfectly feasable to tap into the cellular fiber
    backhaul. Of course, this is for academic purposes only and should
    not be construed as criminal activity or vandalism.

    The fiber cable probably has about 50 fibers inside. There is no easy
    way to determine which one is carrying which part of the data.
    Therefore you'll need to place a fiber tap in all 50 fibers. That
    will require a $5,000 fusion splicer and a mess of 3M fiber splices at
    about $10/ea. The taps are something like this:
    http://www.lan-wan-tap.com/Products/...iber_taps.html
    and cost about $200/port times 50 ports. Some care should be taken as
    to the outage time as most fiber links are carefully monitored for
    changes in signal level and outages.

    The internet data is probably part of the SONET/SDH network as IP over
    ATM or SONET. You'll therefore need an ATM switch. I'm not very well
    versed on current telco technology and can't offer specific equipment
    recommendations for this part. I do know such boxes are not cheap.

    Even with the proper equipment, you'll probably need figure out which
    of the 50 fibers carries which part of the data. However, eventually
    you'll get it sorted out and find yourself receiving aggregate data at
    perhaps several hundred megabits/sec.

    Data connections are normally first registered with the SS7 signalling
    system for billing purposes. Basically, nothing goes in or out
    without the billing systems involvement. You'll therefore have to
    spoof the cell sites terminal hardware in order to send or receive
    data. By spoofing the cellular terminal, you can setup or bread down
    data connections at will. That's your internet connection.

    So, armed with nothing more than a huge bank balance, arcane telco
    network knowledge, manuals for everything inside the cell site, some
    old issues of 2600 magazine describing the SS7 system, and several
    years of spare time, you can successfully tap a cell site fiber cable.

    Good luck.
    --
    Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
    831.336.2558 voice
    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
    http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann
    [email protected] [email protected]




  3. #3
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: Cell Tower Question

    "John Navas" wrote in message

    > >Would it be better to splice
    > >into the fiber optic cable?

    >
    > That'a a joke, right?
    >
    > >What would that cable contain? Are there other forums that would have
    > >more info?

    >
    > alt.prison


    LOL -- that was good.

    Yep. That fiber contains green light. Cut it and a bunch of pretty lights
    turn red.

    (While in the military, that was the answer I gave to some civil engineers,
    at the "ready" in their bulldozers, after being asked if one of our fiber
    cables was "anything important". Over in the desert those guys could always
    be counted on for tearing up cable.)







  4. #4
    Mark W. Oots
    Guest

    Re: Cell Tower Question


    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > [POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
    >
    > In <[email protected]> on 19 Oct 2005
    > 15:02:03 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
    >
    >>I hope this is the right forum for this.

    >
    > alt.cellular.cingular would be more appropriate.
    >
    >>I live about 100 feet from a SBC cell tower.

    >
    > Presumably Cingular.
    >
    >> The tower is about
    >>120 ft high. I have observed three types of lines going into the
    >>building complex/power station. One it a regular voltage power line.
    >>Second, is a regular phone line, that I suppose techs use to contact
    >>home office. Third is a fiber optics line.
    >>
    >>I was wondering is there anything I could tap into as far as either
    >>getting Internet access? Would I still need an antenna for
    >>picking up transmissions from the tower?

    >
    > You need a Cingular wireless device and data plan.
    >
    >>Would it be better to splice
    >>into the fiber optic cable?

    >
    > That'a a joke, right?
    >
    >>What would that cable contain? Are there other forums that would have
    >>more info?

    >
    > alt.prison
    >


    I guess this proves that there is a huge difference between a hacker and a
    hack...

    Mark





  • Similar Threads