Results 1 to 15 of 42
- 02-27-2006, 07:17 PM #1J CollinsGuest
As I'm thinking of changing to Cingular in the future, I'm closely reading
the fine print of their latest brochure. I have two excerpts of concern as
follows:
1. "Calls placed on networks by other carriers may take longer to be
processed, and billing for these calls may be delayed. Those minutes will
be applied against your anytime monthly minutes in the month in which the
calls appear on your bill." I interpret this as saying that any delayed
billing will be taken from future anytime minutes--even if those calls were
made during N/W times...........what does this mean exactly?
2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5 million
times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for the
call". What does this mean, exactly?
Thanks so much for any responses.
› See More: A few questions.......
- 02-27-2006, 07:39 PM #2John NavasGuest
Re: A few questions.......
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:17:08 GMT,
"J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>As I'm thinking of changing to Cingular in the future, I'm closely reading
>the fine print of their latest brochure. I have two excerpts of concern as
>follows:
>
>1. "Calls placed on networks by other carriers may take longer to be
>processed, and billing for these calls may be delayed. Those minutes will
>be applied against your anytime monthly minutes in the month in which the
>calls appear on your bill." I interpret this as saying that any delayed
>billing will be taken from future anytime minutes--even if those calls were
>made during N/W times...........what does this mean exactly?
It simply means that they will be charged against the appropriate minute
category (anytime, rollover, N&W) in the month in which they are processed,
not the month in which the calls were made, and not any anytime if made during
N&W.
>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5 million
>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for the
>call". What does this mean, exactly?
Just what you guessed -- you are always charged for incoming calls, whether on
your handset or on your voicemail..
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 02-28-2006, 12:40 AM #3J CollinsGuest
Re: A few questions.......
Thanks for your answers, but I want to make absolutely sure of something.
On Cingular, customers are charged for missed calls and calls which go to
voicemail, in other words, incoming calls which are not answered, whether or
not they go to voicemail...........is this correct?
If so, that's a deal-breaker for me. I can also see why (if this IS the
case) the rollover minutes are necessary. This is ridiculous, if it is
true!
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:17:08
> GMT,
> "J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>As I'm thinking of changing to Cingular in the future, I'm closely reading
>>the fine print of their latest brochure. I have two excerpts of concern
>>as
>>follows:
>>
>>1. "Calls placed on networks by other carriers may take longer to be
>>processed, and billing for these calls may be delayed. Those minutes will
>>be applied against your anytime monthly minutes in the month in which the
>>calls appear on your bill." I interpret this as saying that any delayed
>>billing will be taken from future anytime minutes--even if those calls
>>were
>>made during N/W times...........what does this mean exactly?
>
> It simply means that they will be charged against the appropriate minute
> category (anytime, rollover, N&W) in the month in which they are
> processed,
> not the month in which the calls were made, and not any anytime if made
> during
> N&W.
>
>>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5 million
>>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for
>>the
>>call". What does this mean, exactly?
>
> Just what you guessed -- you are always charged for incoming calls,
> whether on
> your handset or on your voicemail..
>
> --
> Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 02-28-2006, 01:02 AM #4John NavasGuest
Re: A few questions.......
I didn't say that, and there's nothing ridiculous about it. You are charged
for incoming calls that (1) you answer or (2) go to voicemail. You will only
be charged for unanswered calls that don't go to voicemail if you turn off
voicemail and/or increase your ring timeout from the default.
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:40:20 GMT,
"J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Thanks for your answers, but I want to make absolutely sure of something.
>On Cingular, customers are charged for missed calls and calls which go to
>voicemail, in other words, incoming calls which are not answered, whether or
>not they go to voicemail...........is this correct?
>
>If so, that's a deal-breaker for me. I can also see why (if this IS the
>case) the rollover minutes are necessary. This is ridiculous, if it is
>true!
>
>
>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:17:08
>> GMT,
>> "J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>As I'm thinking of changing to Cingular in the future, I'm closely reading
>>>the fine print of their latest brochure. I have two excerpts of concern
>>>as
>>>follows:
>>>
>>>1. "Calls placed on networks by other carriers may take longer to be
>>>processed, and billing for these calls may be delayed. Those minutes will
>>>be applied against your anytime monthly minutes in the month in which the
>>>calls appear on your bill." I interpret this as saying that any delayed
>>>billing will be taken from future anytime minutes--even if those calls
>>>were
>>>made during N/W times...........what does this mean exactly?
>>
>> It simply means that they will be charged against the appropriate minute
>> category (anytime, rollover, N&W) in the month in which they are
>> processed,
>> not the month in which the calls were made, and not any anytime if made
>> during
>> N&W.
>>
>>>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>>>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>>>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5 million
>>>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for
>>>the
>>>call". What does this mean, exactly?
>>
>> Just what you guessed -- you are always charged for incoming calls,
>> whether on
>> your handset or on your voicemail..
>>
>> --
>> Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
>> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
>
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 02-28-2006, 10:14 AM #5J CollinsGuest
Re: A few questions.......
John, you are writing to me as if I'm a dumb*ss. Please re-read my #2 and
your original post. I made it clear that I was speaking of unanswered calls
from my end, and you made it "clear" that I would indeed be charged for said
(incoming, unanswered) calls. I believe you didn't take in all of my post
in your original response and now you're acting like I don't have a clue.
Is anyone so stupid that (unless they have the Sprint plan with free
incoming calls) they'd actually think they didn't have to pay for answered
incoming calls? Surely there's a whole different newsgroup for people that
stupid!
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I didn't say that, and there's nothing ridiculous about it. You are
>charged
> for incoming calls that (1) you answer or (2) go to voicemail. You will
> only
> be charged for unanswered calls that don't go to voicemail if you turn off
> voicemail and/or increase your ring timeout from the default.
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:40:20
> GMT,
> "J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Thanks for your answers, but I want to make absolutely sure of something.
>>On Cingular, customers are charged for missed calls and calls which go to
>>voicemail, in other words, incoming calls which are not answered, whether
>>or
>>not they go to voicemail...........is this correct?
>>
>>If so, that's a deal-breaker for me. I can also see why (if this IS the
>>case) the rollover minutes are necessary. This is ridiculous, if it is
>>true!
>>
>>
>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>>
>>> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:17:08
>>> GMT,
>>> "J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>As I'm thinking of changing to Cingular in the future, I'm closely
>>>>reading
>>>>the fine print of their latest brochure. I have two excerpts of concern
>>>>as
>>>>follows:
>>>>
>>>>1. "Calls placed on networks by other carriers may take longer to be
>>>>processed, and billing for these calls may be delayed. Those minutes
>>>>will
>>>>be applied against your anytime monthly minutes in the month in which
>>>>the
>>>>calls appear on your bill." I interpret this as saying that any delayed
>>>>billing will be taken from future anytime minutes--even if those calls
>>>>were
>>>>made during N/W times...........what does this mean exactly?
>>>
>>> It simply means that they will be charged against the appropriate minute
>>> category (anytime, rollover, N&W) in the month in which they are
>>> processed,
>>> not the month in which the calls were made, and not any anytime if made
>>> during
>>> N&W.
>>>
>>>>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>>>>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>>>>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5
>>>>million
>>>>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for
>>>>the
>>>>call". What does this mean, exactly?
>>>
>>> Just what you guessed -- you are always charged for incoming calls,
>>> whether on
>>> your handset or on your voicemail..
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
>>> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 02-28-2006, 10:49 AM #6John NavasGuest
Re: A few questions.......
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006
16:14:37 GMT, "J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>John, you are writing to me as if I'm a dumb*ss.
Sorry you feel that way -- wasn't my intention.
>Please re-read my #2 and
>your original post.
I actually read them quite carefully.
>I made it clear that I was speaking of unanswered calls
>from my end, and you made it "clear" that I would indeed be charged for said
>(incoming, unanswered) calls.
Wasn't, and still isn't, clear to me -- as I wrote, unanswered calls normally
go to voicemail, for which you are charged air time.
>I believe you didn't take in all of my post
>in your original response and now you're acting like I don't have a clue.
I think you're being overly sensitive (no offense intended).
>Is anyone so stupid that (unless they have the Sprint plan with free
>incoming calls) they'd actually think they didn't have to pay for answered
>incoming calls? Surely there's a whole different newsgroup for people that
>stupid!
Call me stupid, but I guess I still don't understand what you mean by
unanswered calls that don't go to voicemail.
>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>I didn't say that, and there's nothing ridiculous about it. You are
>>charged
>> for incoming calls that (1) you answer or (2) go to voicemail. You will
>> only
>> be charged for unanswered calls that don't go to voicemail if you turn off
>> voicemail and/or increase your ring timeout from the default.
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:40:20
>> GMT,
>> "J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks for your answers, but I want to make absolutely sure of something.
>>>On Cingular, customers are charged for missed calls and calls which go to
>>>voicemail, in other words, incoming calls which are not answered, whether
>>>or
>>>not they go to voicemail...........is this correct?
>>>
>>>If so, that's a deal-breaker for me. I can also see why (if this IS the
>>>case) the rollover minutes are necessary. This is ridiculous, if it is
>>>true!
>>>
>>>
>>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>>>>
>>>> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:17:08
>>>> GMT,
>>>> "J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>As I'm thinking of changing to Cingular in the future, I'm closely
>>>>>reading
>>>>>the fine print of their latest brochure. I have two excerpts of concern
>>>>>as
>>>>>follows:
>>>>>
>>>>>1. "Calls placed on networks by other carriers may take longer to be
>>>>>processed, and billing for these calls may be delayed. Those minutes
>>>>>will
>>>>>be applied against your anytime monthly minutes in the month in which
>>>>>the
>>>>>calls appear on your bill." I interpret this as saying that any delayed
>>>>>billing will be taken from future anytime minutes--even if those calls
>>>>>were
>>>>>made during N/W times...........what does this mean exactly?
>>>>
>>>> It simply means that they will be charged against the appropriate minute
>>>> category (anytime, rollover, N&W) in the month in which they are
>>>> processed,
>>>> not the month in which the calls were made, and not any anytime if made
>>>> during
>>>> N&W.
>>>>
>>>>>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>>>>>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>>>>>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5
>>>>>million
>>>>>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for
>>>>>the
>>>>>call". What does this mean, exactly?
>>>>
>>>> Just what you guessed -- you are always charged for incoming calls,
>>>> whether on
>>>> your handset or on your voicemail..
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 02-28-2006, 01:05 PM #7MartyGuest
Re: A few questions.......
Somewhere around Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:49:44 GMT, while reading
alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from John Navas
<[email protected]>:
>>I made it clear that I was speaking of unanswered calls
>>from my end, and you made it "clear" that I would indeed be charged for said
>>(incoming, unanswered) calls.
>
>Wasn't, and still isn't, clear to me -- as I wrote, unanswered calls normally
>go to voicemail, for which you are charged air time.
>
John, try to be civil; I'm not sure if you are correct or not, but I can
certainly understand his issue, and you may or may not, but if you do,
you're not letting on.
Are you saying that if I never check my voice mail messages, I will still be
charged airtime for those messages? If my phone is turned off for the whole
month, are you saying I might still incur substantial charges if someone is
trying very hard to call me, possibly during the day?
If so, I think this would be something that most people wouldn't suspect to
be the case. If I had a very limited allotment of anytime minutes, I'd
think I could control the number used by not calling or answering during the
day, but you are saying I should answer, as it may cost as much or more to
allow it to go to voice mail.
I believe I will check with Cingular to see if you are correct. My advice
to the original poster is to do the same if it is important. In general,
never make a decision based on the answer you get from one person in a
newsgroup without confirmation.
--
Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com
"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
- 02-28-2006, 01:33 PM #8J CollinsGuest
Re: A few questions.......
Thanks, Marty!
"Marty" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Somewhere around Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:49:44 GMT, while reading
> alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from John Navas
> <[email protected]>:
>
>
>>>I made it clear that I was speaking of unanswered calls
>>>from my end, and you made it "clear" that I would indeed be charged for
>>>said
>>>(incoming, unanswered) calls.
>>
>>Wasn't, and still isn't, clear to me -- as I wrote, unanswered calls
>>normally
>>go to voicemail, for which you are charged air time.
>>
> John, try to be civil; I'm not sure if you are correct or not, but I can
> certainly understand his issue, and you may or may not, but if you do,
> you're not letting on.
>
> Are you saying that if I never check my voice mail messages, I will still
> be
> charged airtime for those messages? If my phone is turned off for the
> whole
> month, are you saying I might still incur substantial charges if someone
> is
> trying very hard to call me, possibly during the day?
>
> If so, I think this would be something that most people wouldn't suspect
> to
> be the case. If I had a very limited allotment of anytime minutes, I'd
> think I could control the number used by not calling or answering during
> the
> day, but you are saying I should answer, as it may cost as much or more to
> allow it to go to voice mail.
>
> I believe I will check with Cingular to see if you are correct. My advice
> to the original poster is to do the same if it is important. In general,
> never make a decision based on the answer you get from one person in a
> newsgroup without confirmation.
>
> --
> Marty - public.forums (at) gmail (dot) com
> "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...
> well, I have others." - Groucho Marx
- 02-28-2006, 02:00 PM #9HarryGuest
Re: A few questions.......
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:39:20 GMT, John Navas
<[email protected]> wrote:
SNIP
>>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5 million
>>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for the
>>call". What does this mean, exactly?
>
>Just what you guessed -- you are always charged for incoming calls, whether on
>your handset or on your voicemail..
I am not charged for calls to me that I do not answer, whether they go
to voicemail or not. I am charged for my call to voicemail to get the
message.
- 02-28-2006, 02:19 PM #10J CollinsGuest
Re: A few questions.......
Thanks, Harry. It simply doesn't make sense to me that *I* would be so
vulnerable that anyone could call my phone multiple times a day and I would
be charged, even if I didn't answer (whether or not they actually left a
voicemail). Heck, Cingular could set up employees to sit and call
customers' phones and really run up bills.............I mean, to me this is
a crazy charge! Sadly, I just called the 800# (previously tried to do
things locally so as to not cost the company any money and was told, flat
out, that any incoming call, whether answered or unanswered, minus or plus a
voicemail message being left, will incur a charge against my monthly
allotment. Since one CS "confirmed" this, even if the next 50 I asked
denied it, this is definitely something that would prevent me from ever
going to Cingular. Not that they'll miss me--it just really seems like an
unfair business practice to me.
John, sorry we weren't sympatico .
J
"Harry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:39:20 GMT, John Navas
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>
>>>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>>>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>>>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5 million
>>>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for
>>>the
>>>call". What does this mean, exactly?
>>
>>Just what you guessed -- you are always charged for incoming calls,
>>whether on
>>your handset or on your voicemail..
>
> I am not charged for calls to me that I do not answer, whether they go
> to voicemail or not. I am charged for my call to voicemail to get the
> message.
>
- 02-28-2006, 02:27 PM #11John NavasGuest
Re: A few questions.......
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:05:44
-0800, Marty <[email protected]> wrote:
>Somewhere around Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:49:44 GMT, while reading
>alt.cellular.cingular, I think I thought I saw this post from John Navas
><[email protected]>:
>
>>>I made it clear that I was speaking of unanswered calls
>>>from my end, and you made it "clear" that I would indeed be charged for said
>>>(incoming, unanswered) calls.
>>
>>Wasn't, and still isn't, clear to me -- as I wrote, unanswered calls normally
>>go to voicemail, for which you are charged air time.
>>
>John, try to be civil;
I'm being quite civil, and have spent a significant amount of time trying to
help. Try not to be so easily annoyed and to be a bit more appreciative.
>I'm not sure if you are correct or not, but I can
>certainly understand his issue, and you may or may not, but if you do,
>you're not letting on.
I freely admit that I'm having a difficult time understanding what makes this
an issue.
>Are you saying that if I never check my voice mail messages, I will still be
>charged airtime for those messages?
I was, but I've just checked, and see that my previous statement is out of
date -- Cingular confirmed to me that there is *no* charge for incoming
voicemail messages.
>If my phone is turned off for the whole
>month, are you saying I might still incur substantial charges if someone is
>trying very hard to call me, possibly during the day?
You won't be.
>If so, I think this would be something that most people wouldn't suspect to
>be the case.
>If I had a very limited allotment of anytime minutes, I'd
>think I could control the number used by not calling or answering during the
>day, but you are saying I should answer, as it may cost as much or more to
>allow it to go to voice mail.
>I believe I will check with Cingular to see if you are correct.
Good idea.
>My advice
>to the original poster is to do the same if it is important. In general,
>never make a decision based on the answer you get from one person in a
>newsgroup without confirmation.
Good advice -- I was wrong.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 02-28-2006, 02:32 PM #12John NavasGuest
Re: A few questions.......
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:17:08 GMT,
"J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>As I'm thinking of changing to Cingular in the future, I'm closely reading
>the fine print of their latest brochure. I have two excerpts of concern as
>follows:
>[SNIP]
>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5 million
>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for the
>call". What does this mean, exactly?
If you're referring to the material at
<http://www.cingular.com/b2b/OfficeReach_terms_pop>, this applies only to
"OfficeReach" business service, not consumer service.
On consumer service there is *no* charge for recording incoming voicemail
messages or for retrieving them by landline. The only voicemail charge is for
retrieval over the air, for which regular airtime charges apply.
I just verified this with Cingular. My apologies for posting incorrect
information previously.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 02-28-2006, 02:42 PM #13J CollinsGuest
Re: A few questions.......
Thanks, John. Maybe we are sympatico...........I'm a chick, by the way .
Now I'm "hesitant" because of what the person on the 800 # told me. I guess
the cell companies are all the same and you go for "2 out of 3" responses.
Have a good one!
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:17:08
> GMT,
> "J Collins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>As I'm thinking of changing to Cingular in the future, I'm closely reading
>>the fine print of their latest brochure. I have two excerpts of concern
>>as
>>follows:
>>[SNIP]
>>2. "You may be charged for both an incoming and an outgoing call when
>>incoming calls are routed to voicemail, even if no message is left." I
>>interpret part of this as saying "anyone can call my cell phone 5 million
>>times a day and, even if I don't answer the call, I will get charged for
>>the
>>call". What does this mean, exactly?
>
> If you're referring to the material at
> <http://www.cingular.com/b2b/OfficeReach_terms_pop>, this applies only to
> "OfficeReach" business service, not consumer service.
>
> On consumer service there is *no* charge for recording incoming voicemail
> messages or for retrieving them by landline. The only voicemail charge is
> for
> retrieval over the air, for which regular airtime charges apply.
>
> I just verified this with Cingular. My apologies for posting incorrect
> information previously.
>
> --
> Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 03-01-2006, 08:36 AM #14J CollinsGuest
Re: A few questions.......
Was this a slam ?
"subdude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:42:18 GMT, "J Collins" <[email protected]>
> graced us with:
>
>>Thanks, John. Maybe we are sympatico...........I'm a chick, by the way
>>.
>
> Ahhh, that explains it.
>
>
- 03-01-2006, 09:28 AM #15J CollinsGuest
Re: A few questions.......
I understand......and, sadly, I am a bit too sensitive!
"subdude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:36:18 GMT, "J Collins" <[email protected]>
> graced us with:
>
>>Was this a slam ?
>>
>>"subdude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:42:18 GMT, "J Collins" <[email protected]>
>>> graced us with:
>>>
>>>>Thanks, John. Maybe we are sympatico...........I'm a chick, by the way
>>>>.
>>>
>>> Ahhh, that explains it.
>>>
>>>
>>
> Half jokingly.
>
> If you read the entire thread as a outsider, like I did (and then got
> a second opinion from a work mate like I did) you'd see that you
> reacted totally inappropriately to a guy who was trying to help you
> based on the limited information you provided.
>
> Not that we haven't ALL done that from time to time.
Similar Threads
- Sprint PCS
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Samsung
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Computers
¿Quién edita la foto?
in Chit Chat