Bluetooth vs usb!!!!!

When I use my treo for dun what is the speed difference? Would I get
faster speeds if I switch to the cable?

---

› See More: Bluetooth vs usb!!!!!

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:59:14 -0600, Maduro wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>When I use my treo for dun what is the speed difference?

Essentially none.

>Would I get
>faster speeds if I switch to the cable?

No.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Maduro wrote:
> When I use my treo for dun what is the speed difference? Would I get
> faster speeds if I switch to the cable?

In theory no, in practice perhaps.

Depends if the is any significant in-band interference. For example,
I have a Bluetooth wireless mouse and when I start printing to my USB
printer my mouse becomes very sluggish and marginally responsive.

Just try it and see.

On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:40:14 GMT, decaturtxcowboy
<[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>Maduro wrote:
>> When I use my treo for dun what is the speed difference? Would I get
>> faster speeds if I switch to the cable?
>
>In theory no, in practice perhaps.
>
>Depends if the is any significant in-band interference. For example,
>I have a Bluetooth wireless mouse and when I start printing to my USB
>printer my mouse becomes very sluggish and marginally responsive.

Something is seriously wrong -- that shouldn't be happening.

>Just try it and see.

Good advice.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

John Navas wrote:

>> Depends if the is any significant in-band interference. For example,
>> I have a Bluetooth wireless mouse and when I start printing to my USB
>> printer my mouse becomes very sluggish and marginally responsive.
>
> Something is seriously wrong -- that shouldn't be happening.

Serious in that its an inconvenience.

Not serious as there's no telling how much incidental spurious
radiation coming off the printer's USB line. My IP cams also
interfere, that's why they have clip on filters.

On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:38:21 GMT, decaturtxcowboy
<[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>John Navas wrote:
>
>>> Depends if the is any significant in-band interference. For example,
>>> I have a Bluetooth wireless mouse and when I start printing to my USB
>>> printer my mouse becomes very sluggish and marginally responsive.
>>
>> Something is seriously wrong -- that shouldn't be happening.
>
>Serious in that its an inconvenience.

Serious is that it's not working properly, and could be a symptom of a
more fundamental problem. When you permit that kind of thing, then you
can't reasonably compare your system to others, since you know it not to
be working properly.

>Not serious as there's no telling how much incidental spurious
>radiation coming off the printer's USB line.

Almost certainly not a problem unless your cable is really crappy, but
easily tested.

>My IP cams also
>interfere, that's why they have clip on filters.

Irrelevant.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

John Navas wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:38:21 GMT, decaturtxcowboy
> <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
>> John Navas wrote:
>>
>>>> Depends if the is any significant in-band interference. For example,
>>>> I have a Bluetooth wireless mouse and when I start printing to my USB
>>>> printer my mouse becomes very sluggish and marginally responsive.
>>> Something is seriously wrong -- that shouldn't be happening.
>> Serious in that its an inconvenience.
>
> Serious is that it's not working properly, and could be a symptom of a
> more fundamental problem. When you permit that kind of thing, then you
> can't reasonably compare your system to others, since you know it not to
> be working properly.
>
>> Not serious as there's no telling how much incidental spurious
>> radiation coming off the printer's USB line.
>
> Almost certainly not a problem unless your cable is really crappy, but
> easily tested.
>> My IP cams also
>> interfere, that's why they have clip on filters.
>
> Irrelevant.

Only thing irrelevant is opinions proffered by individuals
that do not have professional experience as a full time professional.
You do have an Anritsu spectrum analyzer and Cognito card handy,
right? Didn't think so. Those are toys for the big boys.

On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:10:00 GMT, decaturtxcowboy
<[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>John Navas wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:38:21 GMT, decaturtxcowboy
>> <[email protected]> wrote in
>> <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> John Navas wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Depends if the is any significant in-band interference. For example,
>>>>> I have a Bluetooth wireless mouse and when I start printing to my USB
>>>>> printer my mouse becomes very sluggish and marginally responsive.
>>>> Something is seriously wrong -- that shouldn't be happening.
>>> Serious in that its an inconvenience.
>>
>> Serious is that it's not working properly, and could be a symptom of a
>> more fundamental problem. When you permit that kind of thing, then you
>> can't reasonably compare your system to others, since you know it not to
>> be working properly.
>>
>>> Not serious as there's no telling how much incidental spurious
>>> radiation coming off the printer's USB line.
>>
>> Almost certainly not a problem unless your cable is really crappy, but
>> easily tested.
>>> My IP cams also
>>> interfere, that's why they have clip on filters.
>>
>> Irrelevant.
>
>Only thing irrelevant is opinions proffered by individuals
>that do not have professional experience as a full time professional.
>You do have an Anritsu spectrum analyzer and Cognito card handy,
>right? Didn't think so. Those are toys for the big boys.

As a self-proclaimed "big boy", why isn't your system working properly,
and why do you have so many problems with wireless data?

"It's a poor workman that blames his tools."

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

John Navas wrote:
> As a self-proclaimed "big boy", why isn't your system working properly,
> and why do you have so many problems with wireless data?

New to interference issue also, huh? Thought so.

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:36:04 GMT, decaturtxcowboy
<[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>John Navas wrote:

>> As a self-proclaimed "big boy", why isn't your system working properly,
>> and why do you have so many problems with wireless data?
>
>New to interference issue also, huh? Thought so.

I am indeed, because they are so easy to avoid. My gear works properly.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>