Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 41 of 41
  1. #31
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    "John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in news8jth.51705
    [email protected]:

    > That's about 50 miles west of me. I'm in the Napa Valley wine country,
    > aka paradise.
    >
    > --
    > John Richards
    >
    >


    Hmm....you bring the wine. I'll bring the big shrimps and Blue Crabs....
    (c;

    Larry
    --
    Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
    Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.



    See More: _Murky picture for video phones_




  2. #32
    Kurt
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Larry <[email protected]> wrote:

    > "John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in news8jth.51705
    > [email protected]:
    >
    > > That's about 50 miles west of me. I'm in the Napa Valley wine country,
    > > aka paradise.
    > >
    > > --
    > > John Richards
    > >
    > >

    >
    > Hmm....you bring the wine. I'll bring the big shrimps and Blue Crabs....
    > (c;
    >
    > Larry


    I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.

    --
    To reply by email, remove the word "space"



  3. #33
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-4B07BC.08111524012007
    @news.giganews.com:

    > I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
    >
    >


    No, not quite the same. Ours have 8 legs...(c;



    Larry
    --
    Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
    Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.



  4. #34
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-4B07BC.08111524012007
    @news.giganews.com:

    > I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
    >
    >


    You still dating "her"?.....or "him"?

    Larry
    --
    Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
    Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.



  5. #35
    Kurt
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Larry <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-4B07BC.08111524012007
    > @news.giganews.com:
    >
    > > I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
    > >
    > >

    >
    > No, not quite the same. Ours have 8 legs...(c;
    >

    I've seen the NC girls...

    --
    To reply by email, remove the word "space"



  6. #36
    Kurt
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Larry <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-4B07BC.08111524012007
    > @news.giganews.com:
    >
    > > I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
    > >
    > >

    >
    > You still dating "her"?.....or "him"?
    >
    > Larry


    Both- an Hermaphrodite. Got tired of trying to figure out which end was
    up.

    --
    To reply by email, remove the word "space"



  7. #37
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-9588E3.18243624012007
    @news.giganews.com:

    > I've seen the NC girls...
    >


    So have I, but of course that is in NORTH Carolina. Charleston is
    conveniently located in SOUTH Carolina, a planet away.

    Larry
    --
    Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
    Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.



  8. #38
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-C2A09E.18262024012007
    @news.giganews.com:

    > Both- an Hermaphrodite. Got tired of trying to figure out which end was
    > up.
    >
    >


    Too bad there isn't a valve you can switch on those so you can have a horny
    female when you're in the mood, then throw the valve and have a buddy guy
    to go to the football games with....(c;

    We'll have them like that, shortly, with genetic engineering. They'll not
    have valves....Bluetooth remote controls you won't be able to pair with on
    a Verizon cellphone all hobbled up like they are....

    ON TOPIC! ON TOPIC!!...hee hee.

    Larry
    --
    Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
    Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.



  9. #39
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:45:01 GMT, Curtis R Anderson <[email protected]>
    wrote in <xGUsh.9790$gS1.8509@trndny01>:

    >SMS wrote:


    >> That's the big difference between the U.S. and much of Europe and Asia.
    >>
    >> When I'm in Japan and Korea, there's a tremendous amount of text
    >> messaging and watching other crap on phones, but it's because people are
    >> bored while commuting on the train or subway and because it's considered
    >> rude to be talking on your phone on the subway.
    >>
    >> If commuting on public transit ever became more popular for the middle
    >> class in the U.S., outside of cities like NY, Chicago, and San
    >> Francisco, then data usage on the cellular networks would go way up.

    >
    >And it is on a long bus ride, over 35 minutes for one route I can take,
    >when I sit there and use WAP or play a BREW application. I'll get the
    >spam cleaned out in my email on my ride home, making sorting it easier
    >when I sit down at the main system later in the evening.


    You get that much spam?! Have you considered better spam filtering? Of
    the literally hundreds of spams sent to my email addresses each day,
    typically no more than 1 or 2 (and often none) will make it past my spam
    filters. (I could make it even more effective except that I'm not
    willing to accept false positives.)

    >Other than text messaging, I'm surprised I'm not seeing more WAP usage
    >from others.


    WAP uptake has been slow due to complexity, poor performance, limited
    content, and high cost.

    --
    Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



  10. #40
    Curtis R Anderson
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    John Navas wrote:
    > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:45:01 GMT, Curtis R Anderson <[email protected]>
    > wrote in <xGUsh.9790$gS1.8509@trndny01>:


    >>And it is on a long bus ride, over 35 minutes for one route I can take,
    >>when I sit there and use WAP or play a BREW application. I'll get the
    >>spam cleaned out in my email on my ride home, making sorting it easier
    >>when I sit down at the main system later in the evening.

    >
    >
    > You get that much spam?! Have you considered better spam filtering? Of
    > the literally hundreds of spams sent to my email addresses each day,
    > typically no more than 1 or 2 (and often none) will make it past my spam
    > filters. (I could make it even more effective except that I'm not
    > willing to accept false positives.)


    In my case, I have to set up my own spam filters with this (as in the
    email address you see) provider. They encourage users to set up their
    own procmail rules for filtering.

    I tend to leave that alone just in case of a false positive.

    >>Other than text messaging, I'm surprised I'm not seeing more WAP usage

    >
    >>from others.

    >
    > WAP uptake has been slow due to complexity, poor performance, limited
    > content, and high cost.
    >


    I definitely see the limited content. Not to mention it chews up the
    RAZR battery in a hurry.
    --
    Curtis R. Anderson, Co-creator of "Gleepy the Hen", still
    "In Heaven there is no beer / That's why we drink it here ..."
    http://www.gleepy.net/ mailto:[email protected]
    mailto:[email protected] (and others) Yahoo!: gleepythehen



  11. #41
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: _Murky picture for video phones_

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:10:27 GMT, Curtis R Anderson <[email protected]>
    wrote in <nIcvh.3526$yB5.1238@trndny03>:

    >John Navas wrote:


    >> You get that much spam?! Have you considered better spam filtering? Of
    >> the literally hundreds of spams sent to my email addresses each day,
    >> typically no more than 1 or 2 (and often none) will make it past my spam
    >> filters. (I could make it even more effective except that I'm not
    >> willing to accept false positives.)

    >
    >In my case, I have to set up my own spam filters with this (as in the
    >email address you see) provider. They encourage users to set up their
    >own procmail rules for filtering.
    >
    >I tend to leave that alone just in case of a false positive.


    Take a hard look at naive Bayesian classifiers (e.g., POPFile
    <http://popfile.sourceforge.net>), which do a remarkably accurate job of
    spam classification (better than 99.5% in my case) once they have been
    trained on a couple hundred messages or so.

    --
    Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123