Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Michael Paris
    Guest

    Re: 3G availablity??


    > Actually I'm pretty sure that Navas understands the appeal of WiMax,
    > he's just upset that Cingular isn't deploying it.



    I would prefer to have cingular have it, but for two reason's they don't,
    sprint gave me a 23% discount on the monthly fee, they had a usb adaptor
    which allows me to use it on several computers no matter what adaptor slot
    they have, and they have OSX drivers. So for under $50 with taxes, I am
    getting decent service. They adator cost me $65 or so bux and I'm getting a
    $50 rebate.

    Even if I decide being with sprint isn't for me and cingular deploys it's
    hsdpa around by me and in other areas I goto frequently, it's cheaper or
    about the same for me to keep them for a year or so, and just pay the $200
    termination fee, and go with cingular who is going to charbe m $60 plus
    taxes.




    See More: 3G availablity??




  2. #17
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: 3G availablity??

    On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:35:51 GMT, DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob>
    wrote in <[email protected]>:

    >John Navas wrote:
    >>> Trade magazines for *professionals in the industry* disagree with *your*
    >>> assessment of vaporware for WiMAX.

    >>
    >> Trade magazines are actually full of news of repeated major delays of
    >> WiMAX -- mobile _still_ isn't approved -- and problems in deployment.

    >
    >Google and CNN do not qualify as "trade magazines", pumpkin.


    Indeed, doofus.

    --
    Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



  3. #18
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: 3G availablity??

    On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:23:23 -0700, SMS <[email protected]>
    wrote in <[email protected]>:

    >Scott wrote:
    >
    >> Untrue, Novice.

    >
    >In fact, Wimax is _by far_ the most efficient wireless technology. The
    >problem that Cingular, Verizon, and Sprint face with their HSDPA and
    >EVDO networks is that they can't emulate the DSL scenario of dropping
    >the price to greatly increase the market penetration due to the high
    >bandwidth requirements of HSDPA and EVDO. WiMax is a way around this
    >problem.


    In fact WiMAX is no more efficient than other comparable wireless
    technologies, and mobile WiMAX is still vaporware.

    >Actually I'm pretty sure that Navas understands the appeal of WiMax,
    >he's just upset that Cingular isn't deploying it.


    I actually couldn't care less, and unlike you, I don't spend my time
    trolling.

    --
    Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



  4. #19
    DTC
    Guest

    Re: 3G availablity??

    John Navas wrote:
    > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:35:51 GMT, DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob>
    > wrote in <[email protected]>:
    >
    >> John Navas wrote:
    >>>> Trade magazines for *professionals in the industry* disagree with *your*
    >>>> assessment of vaporware for WiMAX.
    >>> Trade magazines are actually full of news of repeated major delays of
    >>> WiMAX -- mobile _still_ isn't approved -- and problems in deployment.

    >> Google and CNN do not qualify as "trade magazines", pumpkin.

    >
    > Indeed, doofus.


    Coming from someone that says if you can't attack a man's logic, attack the
    man.




  5. #20
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: 3G availablity??

    On Wed, 02 May 2007 01:49:00 GMT, DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob>
    wrote in <[email protected]>:

    >John Navas wrote:
    >> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:35:51 GMT, DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob>
    >> wrote in <[email protected]>:
    >>
    >>> John Navas wrote:
    >>>>> Trade magazines for *professionals in the industry* disagree with *your*
    >>>>> assessment of vaporware for WiMAX.
    >>>> Trade magazines are actually full of news of repeated major delays of
    >>>> WiMAX -- mobile _still_ isn't approved -- and problems in deployment.
    >>> Google and CNN do not qualify as "trade magazines", pumpkin.

    >>
    >> Indeed, doofus.

    >
    >Coming from someone that says if you can't attack a man's logic, attack the
    >man.


    Simply tit for tat. If that offends you, eschew the tit.

    --
    Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12