AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.

In article <[email protected]>, Kevin
Weaver <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'll top post every time. Don't like it, don't read it.


If you don't care for anyone to read your message, why bother posting?

Since the purpose of writing these and posting them is for others to
see them, why not participate in such a very simple way?
Why be combative, difficult, and childish?

This is how you have been taught to read and write ALL YOUR LIFE -- it
is acceptable and intelligent. Why fight that?

---

› See More: AT&T's iPhone Store Locator has been posted.

In article <[email protected]>,
Edwin <[email protected]> wrote:

> > He goes on to say that "your complaint seems to be tied to your PC"
> > which it wasn't." He is telling us what he read in the work order.
> > Again, if you want the full context, click on the link above and scroll
> > to July 3, 6:39pm. BTW, the work order was for a dead battery.
>
> Demanding quotes is Alan's way of discrediting others. But it's a
> different story when you ask him for references. Put him to the
> test: ask for a reference to the Mayor of R'lyeh saying Apple is
> going out of business. Alan claimed there was more of those posts
> than anybody could count, yet he can't produce a reference to even one.

I pointed to several such references at the time.

"All Of Macdom, Even Apple, Inc, Whistles Past The Graveyard"
<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...lee8d1bor936at
1%404ax.com>

"...another Cube could put Apple''s credibility on life support"
<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...3%24a05e1490%4
0news.netdirect.net>

"It looks like the ol'marketshare is set to slip again."
<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...4pmvhov44qirj2
6%404ax.com>

"Apple Sales Go Down"
<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...%24272ea4a1%40
news.execpc.com>

"they're still going out of business"
<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ajrepcbtp239je
4%404ax.com>

Not "more than can be counted" of course, but that's just a figure of
speech.


--
Sandman[.net]

And speaking of context, the message to which you refer is not mine.


Mitch wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, News <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>References in this thread are self-evident from context.
>>
>>Not to mention YOUR evidence is ... oops, none offered.
>
> My argument was that your message was nonsensical and poorly written.
> My evidence was your message. It is the most appropriate and accurate
> evidence possible.
>
>
>>And YOUR prior posting history is ... darn, none.
>>
>>Pot, kettle, etc. ???
>
> I've participated in this group for many years.
> I have used only two names.
>
>
>>Don't even bother on the top/bottom issue. You got the message.
>
> I did. I could. That's not true of many others.
>
> What I wrote to you is reasons for you to change for YOUR benefit.
> It would make it possible for YOUR messages to reach and be understood
> by other people. Any sensible person would be trying to do that, since
> posting is rather pointless without those qualities.
>
>
>
>
>>Mitch wrote:
>>
>>>In article <[email protected]>, Kevin
>>>Weaver <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes it is.
>>>>
>>>>If I were to say that it did not suck. Then what be posted then ?
>>>>The company sucks. Can't paint it any brighter.
>>>
>>>
>>>Well, let's see:
>>>no reference to which company you mean
>>>poor grammar
>>>broken sentences
>>>poor word choice
>>>
>>>and more importantly:
>>>no evidence for the statement, which means it has no value at all.
>>>None. Readers assign a value to your statements based on either your
>>>reputation in previous writings or the evidence/arguments you present
>>>in this one.
>>>
>>>You seem to have neither one, so whatever you say is just meaningless
>>>until evidence is offered.