Newsgroups and "Charters"

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:22:44 -0700, "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>"John Navas" wrote:

>> Baloney yourself. The iPhone is a brick. My RAZR V3xx is slim and
>> sleek, and the screen is superb.
>
>"Your" RAZR V3xx is no different than anyone else's. It certainly didn't
>magically grow pixels.

True.

>You must be off the meds again.

That would be you.

>> In fact just as well.
>
>In fact not even close.

In fact just as well.

>As you would know if you actually used both.

Been there; done that.

>Can't believe you are down to outright lying again.

That would be you.

>And replying to posts
>nearly a month old? Pathetic.

No, just busy.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

---

› See More: Newsgroups and "Charters"

"John Navas" wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:22:44 -0700, "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
>>"John Navas" wrote:
>
>>> Baloney yourself. The iPhone is a brick. My RAZR V3xx is slim and
>>> sleek, and the screen is superb.
>>
>>"Your" RAZR V3xx is no different than anyone else's. It certainly didn't
>>magically grow pixels.
>
> True.

Of course it is. I don't need your approval to know it is true either.


>
>>You must be off the meds again.
>
> That would be you.

Ohhh goodie, another "I know you are but what am I?" reply from Navas.


>
>>As you would know if you actually used both.
>
> Been there; done that.

You are full of crap. Your only exposure to an iPhone is from seeing one at
a store, YouTube, and Google. Your lack of knowledge on this subject is
laughable.


--
Mike

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:22:14 -0700, "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >"John Navas" wrote:
> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:09:57 -0700, "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in
> >> <[email protected]>:
> >>
> >>>"SMS" wrote:
> >>
> >>>> The iPhone is a nice web browser on Wi-Fi, and music player.
> >>>
> >>>It does video well too, better than the PDAs or smartphones I've owned in
> >>>the past.
> >>
> >> My RAZR V3xx is just as good.
> >
> >Baloney. Half the pixels and a 2 inch screen are not "just as good."
>
> Baloney yourself. The iPhone is a brick. My RAZR V3xx is slim and
> sleek, and the screen is superb.
>
The iPhone is 7/16" thick. Weighs 5 ozs. Screen: 3"x2" in landscape and
portrait. The thing is amazing and durable.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

In article <[email protected]>,
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The iPhone is a brick.
>
> hmmmm, a brick can't make phone calls, can't browse the web, and is used
> to build buildings and the like.
>
> The iPhone isn't a brick.

Don't even get the brick analogy. It's total volume is less than his
Razr. Way thinner, almost the same weight. Fits in my pocket better than
any phone I've ever had.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

"Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

> Your lack of knowledge on this
> subject is laughable.
>
>

Add it to the long list of subjects already shown to be his achilles heel.

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:22:14 -0700, "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
> >>>> The iPhone is a nice web browser on Wi-Fi, and music player.
> >>>
> >>>It does video well too, better than the PDAs or smartphones I've owned in
> >>>the past.
> >>
> >> My RAZR V3xx is just as good.
> >
> >Baloney. Half the pixels and a 2 inch screen are not "just as good."
>
> Baloney yourself. The iPhone is a brick. My RAZR V3xx is slim and
> sleek, and the screen is superb.

you've never seen an iphone, have you?

--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.

In article <[email protected]>,
"james g. keegan jr." <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:22:14 -0700, "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > <[email protected]>:
> > >>>> The iPhone is a nice web browser on Wi-Fi, and music player.
> > >>>
> > >>>It does video well too, better than the PDAs or smartphones I've owned in
> > >>>the past.
> > >>
> > >> My RAZR V3xx is just as good.
> > >
> > >Baloney. Half the pixels and a 2 inch screen are not "just as good."
> >
> > Baloney yourself. The iPhone is a brick. My RAZR V3xx is slim and
> > sleek, and the screen is superb.
>
> you've never seen an iphone, have you?

James,

navas swears by his v3xx. He uses it to determine the signal strength,
att's coverage and so call "extended GSM" frequencies in the bay area.
He might be too mentally challange to use anything more than a number
pad, such as blackberry, smart phone, pda or iphone.

On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:52:17 GMT, sw <[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> "james g. keegan jr." <[email protected]> wrote:

>> you've never seen an iphone, have you?

I have.

>navas swears by his v3xx.

Yep.

>He uses it to determine the signal strength,
>att's coverage and so call "extended GSM" frequencies in the bay area.

Nope.

>He might be too mentally challange to use anything more than a number
>pad, such as blackberry, smart phone, pda or iphone.

Wrong on that too.

Grow up.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:52:17 GMT, sw <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > "james g. keegan jr." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> you've never seen an iphone, have you?
>
> I have.
>

Yes, but you put your foot in your mouth pontificating about the iPhone
being a "brick" and then going silent when you got called on it.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:52:17 GMT, sw <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > "james g. keegan jr." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> you've never seen an iphone, have you?
>
> I have.
>
> >navas swears by his v3xx.
>
> Yep.
>
> >He uses it to determine the signal strength,
> >att's coverage and so call "extended GSM" frequencies in the bay area.
>
> Nope.
>
> >He might be too mentally challange to use anything more than a number
> >pad, such as blackberry, smart phone, pda or iphone.
>
> Wrong on that too.
>
> Grow up.

Is that the best you can do? Let's try again, how about a FAQ on
"Extended GSM"?

On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:30:18 -0700, Kurt <[email protected]> wrote
in <[email protected]>:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:52:17 GMT, sw <[email protected]> wrote in
>> <[email protected]>:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> > "james g. keegan jr." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> you've never seen an iphone, have you?
>>
>> I have.
>
>Yes, but you put your foot in your mouth pontificating about the iPhone
>being a "brick" and then going silent when you got called on it.

Wrong on all counts.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:33:07 -0700, "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>"John Navas" wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:22:44 -0700, "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> <[email protected]>:

>>>As you would know if you actually used both.
>>
>> Been there; done that.
>
>You are full of crap. Your only exposure to an iPhone is from seeing one at
>a store, YouTube, and Google. Your lack of knowledge on this subject is
>laughable.

Wrong on all counts. Grow up and get a life.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>