Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19
  1. #16
    SMS
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker

    Todd Allcock wrote:
    > At 19 Jul 2007 23:19:53 +0000 John Navas wrote:
    >> <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/19/god_machine_meets_maker/>

    >
    > Wow- that's your third news item you posted from The Register this week.
    > I assume that means you find it reputable.
    >
    > You missed this one, apparently, back in the day:
    >
    > http://www.theregister.com/2007/01/3...d_down_iphone/
    >
    > "Verizon Wireless was the first company offered exclusive access to the
    > iPhone, but turned Apple away because of problems with the proposed
    > business model...
    >
    > [MORE]


    It's likely that the reason he keeps attacking the iPhone is because
    Apple first offered it to Verizon. He must be upset at Apple for doing this.



    See More: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker




  2. #17
    George Kerby
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker




    On 8/16/07 1:10 AM, in article [email protected],
    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:06:28 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
    > <[email protected]> wrote in
    > <[email protected]>:
    >
    >> In article <[email protected]>,
    >> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/19/god_machine_meets_maker/>
    >>>
    >>> ...
    >>>
    >>> The iPhone may yet, as I hoped back in January, give the established
    >>> manufacturers a long overdue reality check. Both Nokia and Sony
    >>> Ericsson have made their smartphones overly crufty and complicated as
    >>> the years go by - while Windows Mobile remains a collection of cracks
    >>> that defies any plaster. Reg readers long for simplicity.
    >>>
    >>> The iPhone, however, doesn't look like the future of phones. If Apple
    >>> permits it, the iPhone should make great inroads into the "second
    >>> phone" market occupied by Windows Mobile and RIM's Blackberry today.
    >>> But the tablet market is pretty small at the end of the day. And
    >>> there really isn't much Apple, or anyone else, can do about mobile
    >>> data services vs real life. Perhaps no one ever will.
    >>>
    >>> Less than a month after the launch we can look back to the hyperbolic
    >>> ventilations of Apple's Poodle Press - the Pogues, Levys and
    >>> Mossbergs - and ask ourselves, "what on earth were they thinking??"
    >>>
    >>> [MORE]

    >>
    >> In the meantime, Motorola products *still* SUCK.

    >
    > Actually quite good.

    They suck 'good'? I guess you would know...




  3. #18
    Scott
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker

    John Navas <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:33:35 -0700, "Kevin Weaver"
    > <[email protected]> wrote in
    > <[email protected]>:
    >
    >>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >>news:[email protected]...
    >>> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:04:49 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
    >>> <[email protected]> wrote in
    >>> <[email protected]>:
    >>>
    >>>>In article <[email protected]>,
    >>>> [email protected] wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Why does Navas go out of his way to find and then post ill
    >>>>> considered articles on the iPhone, and only if they are negative.
    >>>>
    >>>>Because he works for Motorola. ...

    >>
    >>He can only wish .

    >
    > You maybe, but not me. Yuck!
    >


    Yeah- after all, John wouldn't get his 10% discount if he left his Walmart
    greeter job.



  4. #19
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker

    On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:48:14 -0700, SMS <[email protected]>
    wrote in <[email protected]>:

    >Todd Allcock wrote:
    >> At 19 Jul 2007 23:19:53 +0000 John Navas wrote:
    >>> <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/19/god_machine_meets_maker/>

    >>
    >> Wow- that's your third news item you posted from The Register this week.
    >> I assume that means you find it reputable.
    >>
    >> You missed this one, apparently, back in the day:
    >>
    >> http://www.theregister.com/2007/01/3...d_down_iphone/
    >>
    >> "Verizon Wireless was the first company offered exclusive access to the
    >> iPhone, but turned Apple away because of problems with the proposed
    >> business model...
    >>
    >> [MORE]

    >
    >It's likely that the reason he keeps attacking the iPhone is because


    I'm not doing that.

    >Apple first offered it to Verizon.


    Not true.

    >He must be upset at Apple for doing this.


    I couldn't care less.

    The one that cares so passionately here is you, with your longstanding
    grudge against GSM in general and AT&T in particular.

    --
    Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12