Results 16 to 19 of 19
- 08-16-2007, 07:48 AM #16SMSGuest
Re: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker
Todd Allcock wrote:
> At 19 Jul 2007 23:19:53 +0000 John Navas wrote:
>> <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/19/god_machine_meets_maker/>
>
> Wow- that's your third news item you posted from The Register this week.
> I assume that means you find it reputable.
>
> You missed this one, apparently, back in the day:
>
> http://www.theregister.com/2007/01/3...d_down_iphone/
>
> "Verizon Wireless was the first company offered exclusive access to the
> iPhone, but turned Apple away because of problems with the proposed
> business model...
>
> [MORE]
It's likely that the reason he keeps attacking the iPhone is because
Apple first offered it to Verizon. He must be upset at Apple for doing this.
› See More: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker
- 08-16-2007, 12:43 PM #17George KerbyGuest
Re: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker
On 8/16/07 1:10 AM, in article [email protected],
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:06:28 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
> <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/19/god_machine_meets_maker/>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The iPhone may yet, as I hoped back in January, give the established
>>> manufacturers a long overdue reality check. Both Nokia and Sony
>>> Ericsson have made their smartphones overly crufty and complicated as
>>> the years go by - while Windows Mobile remains a collection of cracks
>>> that defies any plaster. Reg readers long for simplicity.
>>>
>>> The iPhone, however, doesn't look like the future of phones. If Apple
>>> permits it, the iPhone should make great inroads into the "second
>>> phone" market occupied by Windows Mobile and RIM's Blackberry today.
>>> But the tablet market is pretty small at the end of the day. And
>>> there really isn't much Apple, or anyone else, can do about mobile
>>> data services vs real life. Perhaps no one ever will.
>>>
>>> Less than a month after the launch we can look back to the hyperbolic
>>> ventilations of Apple's Poodle Press - the Pogues, Levys and
>>> Mossbergs - and ask ourselves, "what on earth were they thinking??"
>>>
>>> [MORE]
>>
>> In the meantime, Motorola products *still* SUCK.
>
> Actually quite good.
They suck 'good'? I guess you would know...
- 08-16-2007, 06:22 PM #18ScottGuest
Re: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:33:35 -0700, "Kevin Weaver"
> <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:04:49 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote in
>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why does Navas go out of his way to find and then post ill
>>>>> considered articles on the iPhone, and only if they are negative.
>>>>
>>>>Because he works for Motorola. ...
>>
>>He can only wish .
>
> You maybe, but not me. Yuck!
>
Yeah- after all, John wouldn't get his 10% discount if he left his Walmart
greeter job.
- 08-26-2007, 08:17 PM #19John NavasGuest
Re: NEWS: When 'God Machines' [iPhones] go back to their maker
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:48:14 -0700, SMS <[email protected]>
wrote in <[email protected]>:
>Todd Allcock wrote:
>> At 19 Jul 2007 23:19:53 +0000 John Navas wrote:
>>> <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/19/god_machine_meets_maker/>
>>
>> Wow- that's your third news item you posted from The Register this week.
>> I assume that means you find it reputable.
>>
>> You missed this one, apparently, back in the day:
>>
>> http://www.theregister.com/2007/01/3...d_down_iphone/
>>
>> "Verizon Wireless was the first company offered exclusive access to the
>> iPhone, but turned Apple away because of problems with the proposed
>> business model...
>>
>> [MORE]
>
>It's likely that the reason he keeps attacking the iPhone is because
I'm not doing that.
>Apple first offered it to Verizon.
Not true.
>He must be upset at Apple for doing this.
I couldn't care less.
The one that cares so passionately here is you, with your longstanding
grudge against GSM in general and AT&T in particular.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
Similar Threads
- Motorola (Verizon)
- Sprint PCS
- alt.cellular.verizon
Desnudar fotos
in General Cell Phone Forum