Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By John Navas
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    John Navas
    Guest
    <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/29/iphone_v_q/>

    Due to poor cellular coverage, both devices were in and out of
    service throughout the drive. The Q, however, exhausted its battery
    after about an hour of continuous use in marginal radio coverage. The
    iPhone was barely 20 per cent down. Both were fully charged overnight
    and had near equal time using voice and data. You can score a major
    plus for the iPhone battery life; it pretty much eliminates the need
    for a swappable battery.

    [MUCH MORE]

    --
    Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



    See More: iPhone battery life
    dorothysinacel likes this.




  2. #2
    Kevin Weaver
    Guest

    Re: iPhone battery life

    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/29/iphone_v_q/>
    >
    > Due to poor cellular coverage, both devices were in and out of
    > service throughout the drive. The Q, however, exhausted its battery
    > after about an hour of continuous use in marginal radio coverage. The
    > iPhone was barely 20 per cent down. Both were fully charged overnight
    > and had near equal time using voice and data. You can score a major
    > plus for the iPhone battery life; it pretty much eliminates the need
    > for a swappable battery.
    >
    > [MUCH MORE]
    >
    > --
    > Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    > John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



    Still quotes the www.theregister.com This must be why he now "Knows"
    that apple went to Verizon 1st for the iphone and got turned down.




  3. #3

    Re: iPhone battery life

    On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:56:52 GMT, John Navas
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    ><http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/29/iphone_v_q/>
    >
    > Due to poor cellular coverage, both devices were in and out of
    > service throughout the drive. The Q, however, exhausted its battery
    > after about an hour of continuous use in marginal radio coverage. The
    > iPhone was barely 20 per cent down. Both were fully charged overnight
    > and had near equal time using voice and data. You can score a major
    > plus for the iPhone battery life; it pretty much eliminates the need
    > for a swappable battery.
    >
    > [MUCH MORE]



    Batteries last far loger if one turns off features they don't need.

    Bluetooth and wiFi will use battery powerlooking
    for connections, turn them off if you aren't using them.



  4. #4
    Elector
    Guest

    Re: iPhone battery life


    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/29/iphone_v_q/>
    >
    > Due to poor cellular coverage, both devices were in and out of
    > service throughout the drive. The Q, however, exhausted its battery
    > after about an hour of continuous use in marginal radio coverage. The
    > iPhone was barely 20 per cent down. Both were fully charged overnight
    > and had near equal time using voice and data. You can score a major
    > plus for the iPhone battery life; it pretty much eliminates the need
    > for a swappable battery.
    >
    > [MUCH MORE]
    >
    > --
    > Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    > John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>


    Well The New York State Consumer Protection is going after Apple over that
    battery issue.As well as the restocking fee for the returned phones, and for
    not making proper disclosures of the phone. It was on WTEN Channel 10 this
    evening as well as WRGB Channel 6.

    Relief is on the way. State Consumer Protection Board and then NYS Attorney
    General will follow if enough customers complain.

    Elector





  5. #5
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: iPhone battery life

    On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:29:59 GMT, "Kevin Weaver"
    <[email protected]> wrote in
    <[email protected]>:

    >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> <http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/29/iphone_v_q/>
    >>
    >> Due to poor cellular coverage, both devices were in and out of
    >> service throughout the drive. The Q, however, exhausted its battery
    >> after about an hour of continuous use in marginal radio coverage. The
    >> iPhone was barely 20 per cent down. Both were fully charged overnight
    >> and had near equal time using voice and data. You can score a major
    >> plus for the iPhone battery life; it pretty much eliminates the need
    >> for a swappable battery.
    >>
    >> [MUCH MORE]


    >Still quotes the www.theregister.com This must be why he now "Knows"
    >that apple went to Verizon 1st for the iphone and got turned down.


    Nope. Just repetition of the USA Today (can you say "yellow
    journalism") op-ed piece.

    --
    Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



  • Similar Threads